Ontkommer

Kim Magowan

 

My husband is Catholic and more devoted than I like, though it didn’t stop Matt from marrying me. In September, our ten-year-old son Ethan will be confirmed—a strange verb. As babies, both our kids were baptized, but Matt blamed it on my mother-in-law. Or rather, Matt allowed me to assume that my mother-in-law was the instigator, and that I should be a good sport and capitulate. That my agreeing to the christenings was akin to eating Rose’s disgusting sweet potatoes topped with mini-marshmallows on Thanksgiving.

 

But Rose died two years ago, so Matt no longer has her to hide behind. “Why do we need to do this?” I ask, when Matt schedules Ethan’s confirmation. I suspect the current culprit is Matt’s sister. I like her considerably less than my mother-in-law and consequently feel more motivation to resist.

 

Only then does Matt say, soberly, “I don’t want Ethan or Sallie to go to hell.”

 

“Don’t you care if I go to hell?” I want to ask. But I don’t. What’s Matt supposed to say?

 

Instead I go to Holy Waters, our neighborhood bar. My favorite bartender, Theo, says, “Your usual?” Theo makes me one of their off-menu cocktails, an After the Gold Rush. They’re delicious; they sneak up on you.

 

Over drinks, I joke with my friends who live down the street about being left out of Team Heaven. My friend Miranda reminds us of that Seinfeld episode, where Elaine gets pissed off when she discovers her boyfriend Puddy is born-again, not because his Christianity is off-putting, but because he doesn’t try to convert her. Puddy accepts her eternal damnation with equanimity. To Elaine, this is proof that he doesn’t love her.

 

I laugh, uneasily.

 

My friend David says, “It’s interesting for a Catholic to get all wackadoodle about these rituals. Usually it’s us Jews, insisting shiksa girlfriends convert.”

 

Ethan and Sallie are automatically Jewish, because I am. Unlike David and Miranda, who celebrate Shabbat, I am only Jewish in the most technical of senses, because my mother was. I never go to synagogue, I didn’t have a Bat Mitzvah. One thing about being Jewish is that no opt-in is required. I like the fact that my religion is the hereditary one, like my dominant brown eyes.

 

For Christmas, my sister-in-law gave Ethan a book about the saints. Often while I cook dinner, Ethan reads me stories about the martyrs. I repeat these to Miranda and David now, as we down second drinks. They are truly gruesome, I tell them, disturbing material for a ten-year-old to be consuming.

 

I tell them that Saint Sebastian, contrary to what they might think, didn’t die because he was shot with arrows. He was indeed shot with arrows and left for dead, but then some woman discovered him bleeding and unconscious, and she nursed him back to health. Once he’d recuperated, Sebastian zoomed straight back to the same emperor who’d condemned him. This time, Diocletian ordered Sebastian clubbed to death; this time, the execution stuck.

 

Theo the bartender is cutting limes in wedges, listening. “How weird, that Sebastian’s always painted stabbed with arrows,” Theo says. “Why not being beaten with clubs?”

 

We decide arrows are better optics, the injuries more paintable.

 

It’s also, of course, weird that as soon as his wounds were healed, Sebastian would dash right back to the court of the emperor who commanded the original arrow firing squad. But one thing I’ve learned about the Christian martyrs, via my son, is that such behavior is far from exceptional. Many saints energetically pursued their martyrdom. If the mode of execution seemed too benign, they sometimes campaigned for additional suffering or indignities. Peter insisted on being crucified upside down.

 

“Allegedly to make up for denying Christ three times,” I tell David, Miranda, and Theo. “But still: doesn’t it seem show-offy, being so masochistic? Isn’t that pretty much what gives ‘martyr’ a bad name?”

 

Renaissance artists painted saints holding the weapons that killed them, like baskets of stones or Catherine’s wheel or the gridiron upon which Lawrence was burned alive. Or saints brandished grisly nods to how they died. In Michaelangelo’s The Last Judgement, Bartholomew, flayed to death, holds a knife in his right hand and his own loose skin in his left, pinched between his fingers like a scrunched-up towel.

 

Miranda, who minored in art history in college, tells us that Bartholomew is a self-portrait. “Apparently, Michaelangelo had ‘feelings’ about being forced to complete The Last Judgement,” she says.

 

That makes us laugh—we’re maybe a little drunk.

 

I tell them flayed Bartholomew is the patron saint of tanners. Does this mean Catholics have a sense of humor?

 

“Supposedly Saint Lawrence, the one who was grilled to death and lugs his gridiron around in paintings, said ‘I’m cooked on that side. Turn me over,’” I say.

 

David says, “Well, that pretty much defines gallows humor.”

 

“That’s what you’d call humorose,” says Miranda, running “humor” and “morose” together. I groan, and David impersonates a rim shot.

 

Then I describe my favorite martyr: Wilgefortis, a young Portuguese noblewoman, promised in marriage to a Moorish king. Committed to maintaining her virginity, Wilgefortis prayed to be made repulsive. Her prayers were answered when she sprouted a full beard. That cracks us up, though the ending of Wilgefortis’s story is sobering: her pissed-off father, angry at having an ambitious match thwarted, ordered her crucified.

 

Quite a few of the martyrs, I tell them, were killed by the command, or even the hand, of their own fathers.

 

David Googles Wilgefortis and reads to us from his phone. Apparently, Wilgefortis has many names, some surprising. David says, “Her Latin-derived name, ‘courageous virgin,’ seems predictable. But In Dutch, she’s called ‘Ontkommer,’ which means ‘One Who Avoids Something.’”

 

That makes us laugh again. But now I’m staring into the depths of my brown drink, its ice cubes half-dissolved, reflecting on all the ways that I relate.

Share

Ghosts-Turned-Blue

Molly’s friend Ronaldo orders a second old fashioned, and she has to tamp down the voice in her head that itches to inform him (to lecture, she corrects herself) of what the ethanol (rotted plant waste is the phrase she really wants to use) is doing to his brain. Sobriety has turned her into her mother-in-law, Didi, who flinches every time Molly inadvertently uses “god” as an interjection. Didi assumes that the “god” of Molly’s interjections is Didi’s God, that by saying, “God, I’m exhausted,” Molly is likening Didi’s God to a “wow” or a “whoa” or a “yikes.” This perceived degradation offends Didi, yes, but the flinch is also Didi suppressing the urge to warn Molly that she’s booking herself a ticket on a high-speed train to hell. Molly has long found religious people intriguing in this respect—how earnestly they believe that they’re more enlightened than you and how this conviction convinces them it is their responsibility to instruct you on how to live. It’s infuriating behavior for sure, but she empathizes with their plight. To believe so certainly that the mother of your grandchildren is going to hell if she doesn’t change her ways, that’s a tough predicament.

 

Alcohol is now for Molly like God is for Didi, in the sense that Molly has spent so much time reading and thinking and talking about alcohol these past few weeks that she believes she knows it far better than Ronaldo and all these other restaurant patrons drinking their fancy cocktails and their blood-hued wine. Because Ronaldo is her good friend and she loves him, she feels an urge to warn him (to proselytize, Molly corrects).

 

It’s like one of those cartoons where the two characters are stranded on a lifeboat, starving, and one looks at his best friend, the chicken, and sees not his fluffy, feathery body but a golden-brown roast, his legs plump drumsticks. Super-imposed on Ronaldo’s warm brown eyes, Molly sees a cirrhotic liver, barnacled instead of smooth. Then that image disappears like a slide she’s clicked, replaced with—Oh god: not some crappy, too-sweet old fashioned, but Molly’s own former go-to drink: Maker’s Mark, with one cube of ice slowly melting. The trick was to pace herself, so she could finish the drink just as the ice finally dissolved. That was the perfect last sip, the signal that she could order another.

 

Molly shakes her head to dislodge the Maker’s, and Ronaldo’s face returns to normal, except he’s giving her a quizzical look. And Molly has to resist (the endless resistance! She understands why people use the expression “white-knuckling”; dinner at a restaurant is like gripping the side of a bouncy river raft) the urge to say, What the hell, dude? Why are you ordering a second cocktail in front of your good friend who has yet to make it past the one-month mark? Is that not a sign in and of itself of a drinking problem, of being in the thrall of alcohol, that you would make such a weak, selfish, and inconsiderate error in judgement? Does not such behavior warrant a lecture on ethanol and cirrhotic livers, since clearly Ronaldo needs saving from himself?

 

Then again, did she not tell him barely forty minutes ago that he shouldn’t censor his desire to drink? Did she not say confidently, “I’ve got this!”

 

These questions rattle in Molly’s head like cubes of ice in a glass.

 

As though he can read her mind, Ronaldo says, “You said you don’t even miss alcohol.” The look in his eyes makes Molly think of how she feels playing arcade games—braced the entire time for her avatar’s impending pixel-dismantling death.

 

He says, “Fuck, Molly.” He sticks up his hand to flag down their waitress.

 

The waitress quickly appears, and Ronaldo tries to cancel the drink, but Molly says, “No, don’t cancel it. He wants the drink.”

 

The waitress has a head of silvery white hair that is almost violet. Rather than make her look old or worn, her hair makes her vibrant and hip. She eyes Molly’s pink prickly-pear lemonade, and Molly suspects that the woman has read this situation clearly. This embarrasses her. Alcohol is such a pervasive and deeply ingrained part of the culture that giving it up is akin to giving up gas-guzzling transportation. Forgoing it makes her seem snooty and judgmental. Her abstaining inconveniences people. Molly’s friend Una commutes by bicycle only, which means no plans that include Una on the guest list can venture outside an approximately six-mile radius. And now Ronaldo feels like he can’t have a second drink.

 

Ronaldo says, “Please cancel it. Thank you.”

 

Molly says nothing, but she is already considering what she will write about this experience tonight in her online community of other people giving up alcohol without AA. The problem with AA, the group ethos goes, is that it is all about willpower, and so all about fighting your cravings. Instead Molly is learning to deconstruct her cravings so that eventually they aren’t cravings anymore. Supposedly this makes not drinking about gain rather than about loss. Supposedly it will make her more present and more joyful.

 

But here she is sitting across the table from her longtime friend, yet she’s thinking about the conversation she will later have about him with other people, strangers she doesn’t know anything about other than that they too have quit drinking. Well, that, and that they share her resistance to AA: a resistance which is not merely about AA glamorizing alcohol (as a permanent “craving” that needs to be resisted “one day at a time”), but also about its emphasis on submitting to a higher power. Molly isn’t “present,” she’s far away, imagining herself back in her bedroom, a space that’s felt cavernous ever since Connor moved out last year, and now, without her nightly, companionable Maker’s Mark, that much emptier.

 

Clearly Connor is not going to come to his senses, recognize how hard Molly is trying, how much she deserves to get him back. “Good for you,” he’d said when she told him she’d quit drinking. It was hard to explain what was so chilly, so measured about the phrase. On paper, it sounded supportive. But Connor’s delivery turned it into something else. It was that subtle way Connor emphasized “you.” He communicated that Molly’s quitting drinking was something that now benefitted her alone.

 

What do cravings become once they are no longer cravings? Molly has never posed the question to her group. She thinks of arcade games again. They were Connor’s thing. She’d always kind of hated them—even Pac-Man, her game of choice—because they made her so damn tense. Curious how those blocky ghosts’ pursuit of the little yellow corn kernel of a figure her hand was controlling could raise her heart rate so much. But she had always chosen to play rather than sit on the red sofa and wait for Connor to be done. She had chosen to play despite how much the experience frazzled her. Because there were brief moments of pleasure in playing Pac-Man, such as when she managed to maneuver her Pac-Man toward a piece of fruit, or better yet, toward a ghost-turned-blue. Then her Pac-Man could destroy the thing that had been taunting him, but only temporarily, until the ghosts resumed their normal coloring and consequently their normally lethal nature. Is that what a craving became when it was no longer a craving? A ghost-turned-blue that could turn on her at any moment? Because as much as she wanted to, she could not believe cravings could remain always and forever ghosts-turned-blue.

 

Or maybe the problem is she’s using the wrong metaphor? Maybe cravings dissolve into nothingness, like when Pac-Man dies three times and no jiggling of the joystick or the coin slot will bring him back to life unless you put in another quarter?

 

The problem is she can always get her hands on another quarter. So how do you make the cravings stop for good? You take a baseball bat to the machine and, after that, every other Pac-Man machine in existence?

 

And can the same alchemy be applied to Connor? Can she take a baseball bat to the memory of him? Make her longing for Connor disappear? Molly imagines asking this to a bunch of strangers who will reassure her (grandmotherly Pat134 and sarcastic but steadfast trickynick): You’ve got this, girl.

Share