Dreams and Daydreams: A Conversation with Christian Moody

Lost in the Forest of Mechanical Birds
Christian Moody
Dzanc Books
$17.95
Publication date: October 14, 2025

 

 

 

 

 

Poissant: Lost in the Forest of Mechanical Birds is a collection that has been in the works for a while. I’ve been watching from afar, as a fan and a friend, as these stories came together, and I was so glad to read the finished book at last. It’s a masterpiece, full stop. The stories are distinct, but they feel connected thematically or stylistically in a way that I can’t quite put my finger on. What do you see as the glue that holds these stories together?

 

Moody: I published the first story at thirty and handed in the collection at forty-nine, so I didn’t chase any current hot topics or consciously attempt to unify them by theme. But I do think they’re a good representation of some of my core obsessions: forests, magical strangeness, and humans in their private, unguarded, awkward moments.

 

I grew up deep in the woods—first in the redwoods of the Santa Cruz Mountains (looks like the Moon of Endor) and then in the deciduous oaks and sycamores of the Midwest. Very isolated. Few people. Lots of trees. People see climate change commentary in my stories because nature is often under threat—and those themes are there—but, more simply put, forests are the landscape of my childhood and heart.

 

How to explain the weird magic? As a kid, my younger brother and I would stand at the bus stop, shivering in the snow, and entertain ourselves with questions like: “What if you had a tiny extra head in your armpit that whispered to you? Would you keep it for life or pluck it? When would you tell your girlfriend?” Those semi-disturbing what ifs helped us laugh through divorce stuff, money problems, and all the usual growing-up stuff. We still fall back into what if mode when we’re together. So, to me, magical weirdness is where my mind goes to survive life’s harder parts, to find joy, to laugh, feel weirded out in delightful ways, and to connect with other people who like that too.

 

And, finally, I’m drawn to people in their private, unguarded moments—like the story with trees with eyes that record everything. Growing up in such isolated places, I get freaked out when someone rings my doorbell. It makes me want to hide. So, as cameras and social media proliferated, it did freak me out, and some of that ended up in my stories. I like to write about how people are when no one’s watching, when they’re alone with themselves, being weird, unafraid to whisper back to that tiny extra head in their armpit.

 

Poissant: You must have influences. George Saunders and Steven Millhauser spring to mind, but those might just be surface level comparisons. Who else do you read whose work creeps into your work, either at the surface level or at the sentence level?

 

Moody: This is a tough one. The metaphor that comes to mind is that writing a story is like building a house out of thousands of stolen parts. I’ll take a board from Kevin Wilson, a bag of nails from Aimee Bender, a few roof shingles from Haruki Murakami, some plumbing from Station Eleven or The Hunger Games. Little bits and pieces of everything I’ve read.

 

But those earliest, first reading experiences might count the most. My most honest roots go back to first grade, when a substitute teacher read The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe. Lucy pushing through the wardrobe’s fur coats into snowy woods was elemental for me. I begged for the book, got it in my Easter basket, sat on a mossy boulder in the redwoods, finished it, and started it again immediately. I didn’t get the religious subtext and skipped over big words, but I loved the witch, werewolves, frozen statues, and talking beavers. I still have that copy, inscribed by the Easter Bunny in my mom’s big, loopy handwriting.

 

Poissant: While we’re talking influence, I couldn’t help thinking of the work of filmmaker Ari Aster, who often credits his love of literature as an influence on his filmmaking. Your stories are richly visual. I can see the worlds of your stories. Do you credit any movies or film language with the nod toward imagery that your prose evokes?

 

Moody: I had to look up Ari Aster—turns out I have seen Midsommar. Beautiful and super creepy.

 

My 1980s childhood left a mark: The NeverEnding Story, The Goonies, Labyrinth. None hit harder than Labyrinth—you had to be eleven, with a crush on Jennifer Connelly, and a confusing parallel one on David Bowie. One of my dreams was to work for Jim Henson’s Creature Workshop; I even wrote him letters, and his son wrote back a few times.

 

Later came The Royal Tenenbaums, Pan’s Labyrinth, and prestige TV like The Wire. More recently, I’ve admired Craig Mazin’s screenwriting on The Last of Us and Chernobyl. I didn’t even see Chernobyl, I just read the scripts. They’re so vivid in memory that I feel like I’ve seen the show. I even had two questions read on his Scriptnotes podcast, including one about puzzle box storytelling that ended up helping me finish the novella. He always mocks my question, then answers it really well.

 

When I write, I often start with an image—a landscape or scene. This seems somewhat cinematic, but I think dreams and daydreams are the real medium writers work with. I like the “waking dream” theory of fiction: the writer has a vivid daydream and uses text to give someone else a similar dream.

 

Poissant: The collection is anchored by a novella: Ray of Golden Yolk. Without offering any spoilers, I think it’s fair to say that Ray, your protagonist and viewpoint character, gets put through the wringer. But the story never treats Ray as a punching bag. How do you negotiate your compassion for your characters with your need to riddle them with conflict?

 

Moody: Raising the stakes was central to Ray of Golden Yolk. I’d put Ray in a tough spot, then try to find a psychologically true reaction. I liked him, didn’t want to hurt him, but I wanted to see how he’d react.

 

I started the story at twenty-five and left just about every mystery unsolved. My editor, Chelsea, asked me to solve those mysteries. Dealing at age forty-nine with the consequences of decisions I made at twenty-five was some of the hardest writing I’ve ever done.

I dodged Chelsea’s emails for months, rewrote the beginning, broke open the original premise and scattered the pieces, failed over and over, then wrote that letter about puzzle box storytelling to Scriptnotes for advice. I almost gave up, thinking maybe I’d just go into hiding and never publish another book.

 

Then, just as Chelsea said maybe we’d go with the original version if I couldn’t deliver, the solutions came. It was easier than I’d thought. I kept the heart of the original story, wrote over twenty new pages, cut a bunch of the middle, and gave the novella a new ending. I didn’t have a daughter when I began the story, but my daughter is now close to the age of the daughter in the story—that might have helped.

 

Poissant: The story “The Babycatcher” feels almost like a fairy tale. Have any fairy tales informed your fiction?

 

Moody: Fairy tales are in my fiction at a deep level.

 

My parents were divorced. At my mom’s, we lived in a shack-like cabin in the Santa Cruz Mountains, surrounded by redwoods. I could walk outside and wander for miles through forest. At my dad’s, down in Santa Cruz proper, the yard was dug up for years for a project, just dirt and sun, which I hated, so I’d retreat to the garage for shade.

 

That’s where I read fairy tales. Brothers Grimm, library finds, garage sale paperbacks. I loved how the same fairy tale could be totally different in another book—translation differences, alternate versions. Fairy tales were an escape from one physical space into another, especially if a story featured woods and weirdness.

 

Poissant: “Horusville” is the quintessential coming of age story. It’s very funny and very sad, sometimes at the same time. In terms of craft, how do you juggle such tonal shifts?

 

Moody: I tried to see each scene as vividly as I could in my mind’s eye and get the reader to see it too (that daydream theory of fiction I mentioned). I often like my own sadness—not full-on depression, but that gentle, pleasurable melancholy of a sad song.

 

As I mentioned, I also love jokes and what if thinking. The kind of sadness in this story and the kind of funny in it are both joy to me—just toggling between stuff I love. So, to me, those tonal shifts never felt far apart.

 

Poissant: For a long time, you taught creative writing. What is your best craft advice for emerging or aspiring writers?

 

Moody: Early on, balance two opposite perspectives: be honest about the kind of work you love and want to write, while staying open to work you might initially dislike because your taste could change—the way maybe you once hated coffee and now love it.

 

At a certain point, though, just write the work you most want to read. I spent years writing stories to please my teachers—competent but without duende, without heart. Eventually, I said eff it and wrote about magical mechanical birds, expecting mockery. Instead, people liked it best. I like cooking/taste metaphors for writing: Just because your teacher or friend is a renowned master chef of French cuisine doesn’t mean they won’t enjoy your awesome scrambled eggs.

 

My list for what I truly want from a story, and a quick, oversimplified tip for how to get there:

  • Momentum—to write a page-turner, open the story with a problem or goal for your character, then place obstacles in the way to create structural suspense by delaying the goal or solution.
  • Immersion—to make the world around the reader disappear, write in scenes, and use precise, vivid descriptions (harder than it sounds).
  • Feeling—one way to break a reader’s heart is to give a character something important and then take it away. But don’t label the feeling (e.g. “she was sad”). Leave the feeling unstated in the scene, and let the reader empathize and provide the feeling themselves (a spin on the classic “show don’t tell”).
  • Meaning—I like stories to feel meaningful, but I don’t want them to be didactic or to play that marketing game of “important issue of today.” All topics are meaningful, you just need to be honest with yourself about what you really care about (a difficult, lifelong journey).

 

Poissant: In closing, what’s next for you? Would you care to share any details about what we might expect from you in the coming years?

 

Moody: As I’ve revised my answers to these questions, they’ve all stayed the same except for this one. I’ve accumulated a big pile of unfinished work. Sometimes, on walks with my wife and daughter, I’ll describe a story or novel I’ve started to see if they like it. There’s a father-daughter time travel novel that they seem keen on, so maybe I’ll finish that.

 

At age forty-nine, with my first book coming out, there’s not much chance of an auspicious debut. It’s too late to build up the long career that makes a writer famous or leads to academic stardom. The money math from writing definitely isn’t mathing for me. These career-related things are all in the rearview mirror. And it feels great!

 

I have zero self-induced pressure. Zero expectations. I just get to think: what kind of story, if I were reading it, would bring me the most joy and meaning? How can I make something with as much honesty and authenticity and generosity as possible? Spending time with my family is more important than writing and dealing with these questions, but if I can steal a little quiet time to write and reflect on some of this stuff—that’s not such a bad use of my time.


Christian Moody

Christian Moody’s stories have appeared in EsquireAlaska Quarterly Review, and in the anthologies Best New American Voices and Best American Fantasy. He received his MFA from Syracuse and PhD from the University of Cincinnati, and spent years as a creative writing professor. He now works as a brand director and lives in Indianapolis with his two kids and his wife, memoirist and illustrator Margaret Kimball.

Share

What’s Left Behind

Elizabeth Chapman

 

I fibbed to Ms. Vanderhooft. It was her word “beginner” that bothered me. The word gave the wrong impression of my experience. Technically, no, I’d never taken a formal piano lesson before, but (and this held great importance in my seven-year-old mind), I lived in proximity to my sister’s playing, which was very good. The lie earned me a volume of impossible music. A system of horizontal lines that looked like fencing, and dots like scattered ants. I sat, silent, at the piano. Ms. Vanderhooft watered her ferns.

 

 

Now, at fifty, I wish I’d been a journalist, or someone whose job it is to name paint colors. Instead, I have a piano studio of my own. I have a few Vanderhooftisms: I angle my grand like Ms. Vanderhooft did, over a Persian rug, like she had. I write students’ assignments like she did, using an extravagant, looped cursive. I have a fern. But the similarities end there. I’m less formal than Ms. Vanderhooft, and surely less intimidating.

 

My personal life is different too. Granted, Ms. Vanderhooft never shared much about her personal life, but I know she never married, which means her husband never suddenly landed his dream job, four states away. She never moved with him, closing her piano studio the week of her twenty-sixth wedding anniversary. She never, in the midst of unpacking, discovered his affair—the result of his sloppy texting. She never repacked her things. Never left him. She never attempted to relaunch her studio with an email sent from a bathroom floor. She never typed “Returning to Virginia” in a subject line, never wrote “leaving my husband” underneath, and she never, to my knowledge, found herself referencing a Gloria Gaynor song to let people know she was just fine.

 

 

I slid the U-Haul into park sometime after dawn. The drive is a blur. I remember some gas station coffee. I remember toggling the radio: on to fill the silence, off to cut the noise, back on to fill the silence. I followed some vanity plates—a BCHLVER, a XOXO4U, a SATAN2, which begs the question. According to TikTok’s Therapy Keith, my mental fog is normal.

 

 

I’ll be reoccupying the marital home while we sort out the terms of the divorce. The house didn’t sell in the month I was gone. My sister calls this circumstance a “God thing.” The place is a faux colonial, nestled in a neighborhood of shaded lawns but leafless driveways. Bucolic by way of tedium. I’m not the ideal resident. The HOA leaves me periodic notes: unapproved shutter color (blue), unapproved door color (also blue), unapproved mailbox, unapproved mailbox flag. This note, taped to my front door, reads, simply: “brick grout.” My married self would have laughed. I swing open the door and shove the letter into my pocket. It isn’t funny.

 

I unpack the studio first—the room just off the entry. I need the money. I roll the piano’s port side against the front windows and set my teaching chair to its right. I push our—my—dining table to a side wall and stage it as a workspace—lamp, laptop, calendar, candy dish. I mount a whiteboard low, just above the baseboards, and fill a basket with a rainbow of chubby, dry-erase markers. Three days later, I’m back in business.

 

 

Owen, age eight, arrives at three. His wavy, red hair has deepened to maroon in the month I was away. I square the welcome mat with my foot as his mother escorts him up the driveway. She has him captured in a sideways embrace—the kind used in hostage situations.

 

“Hi, Owen!” I say.

 

No response.

 

“I have candy. On the desk.”

 

His mother leans in. “O is not exactly enthusiastic about returning to lessons.”

 

She turns to leave. I compliment her sweater.

 

Inside, Owen is standing over the dish of Jolly Ranchers. He has his investigation down to four economical motions:

 

Select, unwrap, lick, return.

 

Select, unwrap, lick, return.

 

I offer him a dry one and tip the rest into the trash.

 

He’s easily the least talented student I’ve ever taught. It isn’t just that Owen lacks some innate musical ability. The problem is his dislike for piano, which verges on histrionic. Today, his presentation is dermatological. He rubs his ears while we chat. (School was “fine.” His weekend was also “fine.”) He chases the itch down his back, twisting left, then right, like a toy on a swivel. I bribe him with dinosaur stickers before thumbing to the easiest piece I can find: “Mission to Mars.”

 

“Curve your fingers,” I say. He extends them. Rigid.

 

He and I have been at this impasse since his first lesson. Almost two years ago. “Play on your tips,” I’ve said. “Be gentle,” I’ve said. I’ve demonstrated, using a feathery voice. Last spring, we spent half a lesson lying on our backs, curling our hands into the soft domed shapes that “all good pianists have.” But the corrections never take.

 

“Okay,” I stop him. “Those are all the right notes. Well done on that. But this is ‘Mission to Mars,’ yeah?” I say. “And outer space has no gravity.”

 

No response.

 

“Right?”

 

I glance at the clock. Ten minutes have passed.

 

“So, float like an astronaut, on the tips of your fingers,” I say, my hands rising. “Weightless,” I add, hoping he’s interested.

 

He’s not. What evolves instead is an argument about gravity. Where it exists, where it doesn’t. I grab my phone and Google “gravity in space,” knowing the conversation should never have gotten this far. He sits cross-legged, listening, then parries. He has a rare condition, he tells me, making it painful for him to play with relaxed hands. It is especially excruciating—I assume this based on the tortured face he makes—for him to play with anything approximating curved fingers.

 

His medical revelation brings us to 3:30 p.m. I hand him his books, hold open the door. His mother waves. I wave back. I am a charlatan.

 

 

A box from my husband arrives just after eight. Inside is the nub of a Maybelline brow pencil, two hair elastics, and four loose cotton balls. The postage on the top of the box reads $18.30. I walk the box to the outside trash barrel, and the barrel to the street. I slide a frozen pizza into the oven, and key his credit card number into a dating website, in the box marked Method of Payment. The lifetime premium package runs $849 if you decline all promotional offers.

 

 

My next day’s students are siblings. They live in my neighborhood, and from the window, I can see their approach. Mabel, thirteen, is walking down the middle of the street, hunched and pumping her arms against the weight of a large purple backpack. Her brother, Sebastian, two years younger and twenty yards back, is traveling at the edge, following the crack that separates the road from the gutter. The shoestring of his right sneaker is dragging and flapping through a collection of wet sludge. This appears to be the goal.

 

I have mixed feelings about Mabel. On the one hand, I admire her. Here is a young girl who thinks fast and speaks her mind. She dismisses conventions, from fashion to politeness, and never misses an opportunity to lead. On the other hand, she’s annoying.

 

She looks taller today and wears one of those harnessed safety sashes, the neon yellow kind worn by crossing guards.

 

“Hall monitor sash,” she corrects me, swinging her backpack to the floor. “It’s my job to tell the other kids where to go.” The typecasting is exquisite.

 

Sebastian enters just behind. His sneakers squeak across the entry before falling silent on the carpeted staircase, where he sits, then winks. Newly acquired skill. I wink back.

 

I spend most of Mabel’s lesson assigning new music and trying to sell her on an arrangement of “Red River Valley.” She’s never heard it, which is fair. They’re not exactly popular, these American ballades. I demonstrate the piece and some sensitive timing I hope she’ll notice.

 

“Beautiful tune, right?” I say, holding the final notes.

 

She retakes the bench. I wait while she squeezes hand sanitizer into her cupped palm.

 

“And it’s nothing you can’t handle, if you practice,” I say. I mean it as encouragement. “So, twenty minutes a day, six days a week. Yes?” I’m drawing a practice chart in her spiral assignment notebook as I talk.

 

She flips the sanitizer closed and returns it to her backpack.

 

“Right?” I say. “Twenty minutes a day?”

 

“Well … Ms. Bellamy, the thing is, we are really busy.”

 

I reach for my coffee.

 

“Busy with what?” I’m imagining acceptable answers: travel, surgery, a funeral.

 

“We’re going to Disney World.”

 

Travel. Very good.

 

“Nice!” I say. “When do you leave?”

 

“It’s next spring. The thing is, my parents and I are busy discussing how to break the news to my school.”

Short of full-time employment, I tell her, she’s not busy.

 

 

During Sebastian’s lesson, I learn that I can teach while I construct a dating profile. I answer the “Basic Information” questions to a rhythmically bereft “Jingle Bells.”

 

Age: 50

 

Height: 5’2”

 

The music has stopped.

 

“Is it a space note or a line note?” I ask.

 

“Space?”

 

He finds his note and proceeds.

 

Astrological sign: Cancer

 

Children: grown

 

Pets: no

 

“Half notes get what?”

 

“Two beats.”

 

“Right. Start back at measure ten?”

 

Smoking: never

 

 

By evening, my Bumble profile is almost complete. Under “Interests” I scroll through dozens of sports, none of which apply. Under “Going Out” I click “cafés.” I choose “cities” from another list, without understanding what the choice commits me to. I mull the last step—the “About Me”—while I flatten the moving boxes I’ve emptied. I carry the flattened boxes to the garage. Cardboard is stacked as high as a car, right in the place his sedan used to sit. Memories of the marriage leave me tired. Just tired. Therapy Keith says I haven’t reached the pain portion of my healing journey. I’m not encouraged.

 

I peck out the final entry just before midnight.

 

“Life is good but I’m looking for my person. If you like conversation and believe vulnerability is a superpower, I’d love to chat.

 

I wake up to thirty-three likes.

 

 

On the phone with my sister, I read the options. “There’s Mustang, 52, University of Pennsylvania. Under ‘About Me’ he writes ‘I am publish.’ ”

 

“But—” she starts.

 

“No, I thought of that. Born and raised in New Jersey. English is his first language.”

 

I scroll.

 

“There’s Trevor, 50,” I say. “He’s a ‘good man whose looking for a woman whose recovered from her woes of life and hasn’t gave up looking for someone to blame for what he done I am worthy of a chance.’ ”

 

“Doesn’t he mean someone who has gave up looking for someone to blame?” she says.

 

“Willie, 53, is a healer. But it says here he doesn’t have cable.”

 

“You’re being picky.”

 

“Under ‘Interests,’ this guy writes ‘COSTCO.’ And this is Bumble’s best. Just think about how good what’s-his-name would seem on a dating profile,” I say. “And he’s a complete asshole.”

 

I say “asshole” with a forced conviction, though. I mute the phone and pop another truffle into my mouth. Our marriage was easy. We didn’t say “I love you.” Literally, we never said it. We skipped straight to how much. “A line, not a segment,” we’d say, and it became our shorthand. Its comfort lay not just in the meaning of the phrase but in the privacy of its loop, closed tight as a hug. I said it in the mornings when he handed me coffee. I said it over my shoulder in the evenings, when he shooed me toward the piano. He said it as he left for work, holding the lunch I’d packed for him in the red-lidded Pyrex. He’d stopped taking my lunches toward the end, it occurs to me now. He’d been taking Lean Cuisines. He said he wanted to drop some weight. I take another truffle and unmute the phone to repeat the word “asshole.”

 

I hang up the phone and Google “affair and brain tumor.”

 

 

I’m meeting a new student today. She’s an eleven-year-old girl who, for the last year, has had the misfortune of being taught piano by her mother.

 

“Ms. Bellamy, thank you for meeting with us,” the mother says. She seems to be working my name into each statement. “Yes, Ms. Bellamy, Gretchen has been playing for one year.” She looks at Gretchen, then back at me. “I brought her curriculum for you to see.” She pauses, and I think she’s forgotten, but she sneaks it in: “Ms. Bellamy.”

 

She unpacks a black valise as she speaks, fanning file folders across the piano lid like a nurse arranging surgical instruments. Blue for technique, yellow for theory, green for daily. Red is marked “FUN.” Then comes the binder—a cross-referencing system of curriculum, calendar, and progress reports. The presentation takes the better part of fifteen minutes, then she asks if she can lie down.

 

“Like, on a sofa?”

 

“Yes, Ms. Bellamy. Thank you.”

 

I point toward the den and turn to Gretchen. “Your mom feeling okay?”

 

She nods. “Oh, she’s good.”

 

I stare at Gretchen’s braids, plaits of curly hair, twisted into submission, and I imagine her mother, curled feline on my sofa, her head on my pillows, a drool stain forming. Pooling. I try standing her back up in my mind. She slumps at me, annoyed, then lies back down.

 

“What would you like to play?” I ask.

 

Gretchen thumbs to her latest piece. The notes, which come slowly, are like the words of a child learning to read—some right, some wrong, and none of them delivered in any relation to the next. I imagine my own halting delivery if I were asked to read aloud in Korean.

 

 

My four o’clock student makes snoring noises over my instructions. He’s going to be quitting piano, he informs me. He needs more time for Pokèmon. Expect an email from his parents, he says, lying on the bench. “I will check my email every day,” I say, speaking to his eyelids.

 

4:30 p.m. refuses to use his third fingers, what non-pianists call middle fingers. “My parents wouldn’t want me to,” he says. “Sticking out your third fingers is short for a bad word.” I tell him that this rule doesn’t apply to pianists. He brightens. I worry he’s misunderstood.

 

Five o’clock draws me an army of stick men on my whiteboard, rather than the quarter notes we are studying. Through a line of innocent questioning, I discover that the men are not holding swords, as I had assumed.

 

 

My 5:30 p.m. is an adult student. His name is Bill Dean, which is how he refers to himself. BillDean. He’s a retired Air Force colonel and fought in Vietnam. “A fighter pilot,” he adds, during introductions. BillDean is a spry eighty, with that wealthy fisherman look—tight white beard, pressed chinos, a half-zipped fleece—like Kenny Rogers advertising for Orvis. His reenrollment gave me some dread, but he pays on time.

 

“Now, Hannah, it’s hard for old BillDean to find this high note,” he narrates as he plays, “so sometimes I take a moment.”

“I get it.” I nod. “Try moving your hand earlier, during this rest,” I say, pointing.

 

“Now, listen,” he says, shaking his head.

 

“Look, Bill. There’s no point in playing complex music until your hands move properly. Think of it as protocol. You wouldn’t fly without completing the flight check, would you?”

 

He smiles and calls me Darlin’.

 

I assign “Pink Polly.”

 

 

Therapy Keith wants me to establish a routine. I choose coffee. Coffee and Bumble. Frankly, I’m surprised by the number of bare-chested men I see online. Some bare-chested men hold beers toward the camera. Some hold recently caught fish. Others hold recently caught fish and beer. Then there are photos of bare-chested men leaning against their cars. Or their trucks. Others are on their motorcycles. One bare-chested gentleman straddles his motorcycle, holding what appears to be his infant daughter.

 

 

McKinley, ten, is sobbing. Her parents have lied to her. And she’s pretty sure she “can never trust them again in her whole life because who would lie to their own child?” She repeats “own chiiiild” like a grieving mother. She sinks into silent-sob territory, and I wait for the breath that follows before offering her a chocolate. From what I can piece together, McKinley has spoken to Riley in the other fourth grade. Riley has an older brother who has a friend who has declared Santa to be “sus.”

“What?” I say, but the jig is up.

 

“It’s a trick.” Her eyes are still brimming. “It’s all from Target.”

 

I nod sympathetically and redirect her to the lesson. McKinley manages to lose herself in the music for a few minutes before her jagged inhales return.

 

“Talk to your parents,” I say, handing her another chocolate.

 

“I’ll sit them down after dinner,” she says, handing back the foil.

 

My own dinner is another frozen pizza. I add the black olives he always hated. Here is the upside of my broken marriage. Olives. I eat and load my plate into the dishwasher. Then I pause to remove my wedding band. What’s left behind is an indentation more noticeable than the ring itself.

 

 

Noon today marks seven weeks since I received his text—the one meant for some unknown woman. I feel a stinging in my chest. Therapy Keith says it’s important to observe these sensations without trying to change them. As if changing them were possible.

 

I marvel that so many people have weathered this situation. It’s a little like you feel after you deliver a baby. For weeks, you see other mothers and think, really? You did this too? I hung pictures today, arranged a bookshelf. I sprayed some Lemon Pledge. My mother called this effort “puttering.” I suspect she puttered to lift her mood. It works a bit. I even find the courage to sit at the piano. But Mozart triggers memories of college practice rooms, closet-sized spaces, just large enough for a piano and a bench—and in our case, his bended-knee proposal. I can’t touch the Schubert he liked to hum, or the Debussy I was learning the day of his text. I play a scale and close the lid.

 

 

Owen’s maroon hair bobs down my driveway. He’s unescorted today and claims to have practiced every day since his last lesson.

 

It’s impossible, since his music has been sitting on the lid of my piano all week. I say so, pointing to his books. “I did it by memory,” he says.

 

The noises that follow have no resemblance to the assignment, but his commitment to the moment is absolute. It is, in a way, the most impressive performance I’ve ever witnessed.

 

 

I unpack the last two cardboard boxes tonight and find things I wish I hadn’t. Pressed flowers, loose pictures. One of us at nineteen, sharing an Orange Julius, another of us standing in front of our first house. The second box contains our wedding album. I flip to the final page, but backing into our memories is no safer. A candid photo stares back, one someone snapped as we left the reception. We’d made it as far as his Camry, rice in my veil. We’re beaming. I look at my eyes, staring back at me. And his. I see no guile.

 

I haul both boxes to the street.

 

 

According to one website, a ring indentation can linger for a year, even two. “Please avoid any ring on your indented finger, until your finger has returned to its normal shape.”

 

No problem.

 

 

Mabel’s “Red River Valley” is still unrecognizable. The problem is her pace. “It’s sluggish,” I say, watching a fine mist soak the boxes at the curb. “You’re sauntering.”

 

“I don’t know what that means,” she says, slow-blinking.

 

“Like, wandering. And you can’t just wander from note to note whenever you feel like it.”

 

“I can.

 

“All right, you can, but wandering disrupts the flow. Do you know the song ‘Anti-Hero’?”

 

She exhales. A curt puff. “Okay, obviously. But what if Taylor just … meandered?”

 

It’s me, Hi, I’m,” I sing, then stop.

 

the

 

problem

 

it’s

 

“Oh my god,” she says.

 

Sebastian hasn’t practiced either. He’s more interested in studying his feet. I watch the clock as he mashes the pedals, raising, lowering, and raising the damper mechanism. When the novelty wears off, I hand him his music. The “Jingle Bells” that follows is predictably slow and, like the previous week’s effort, sounds nothing like “Jingle Bells.” I squirm through his notes, each suspended from the time-space continuum. In the time it takes him to peck out a disjoined o’er the fields we go, I’ve written a grocery list. I straighten books to his laughing all the way, and by his bells on bobtails ring, I give in, feeding him answers, like the Google Maps voice.

 

“Yield for the whole note.”

 

“Proceed four beats.”

 

“Your destination is on the right.”

 

 

I’m getting nowhere with BillDean either.

 

“If you’d curve your fingers, lower your wrists, and count the beats, you’d be playing the hell out of ‘Pink Polly,’ ” I say, but he’s already shaking his head.

 

“Goddamn it, Hannah.”

 

“What, Bill?”

 

He’s a fighter pilot, he reminds me. He wants to play “goddamned classical music.” Good music, he emphasizes as he reaches into his bag. “Good” comes down to two selections for him: “Danny Boy” and “The Man from Snowy River” (the titular movie’s theme song).

 

“The Man from Snowy River” is eleven pages long. It’s dense and difficult. If BillDean isn’t ready for the complexity of “Cat in the Hat,” this “Snowy River” is his Finnegans Wake. “Danny Boy” is no better.

 

“Now just listen,” he tells me.

 

Over the next ten minutes, BillDean finds a dozen notes—first on the page, and then on the keyboard. He’s bent and mumbling as he pecks, and most of what he says is inaudible. I catch a “Christ Almighty” and something about being a “goddamned patriot.”

 

 

My attorney calls. If asshole and I can agree on the financial split, I can be divorced in thirty days. It’s been sixty-one days since we’ve spoken. Sixty-two days ago, my biggest fear was him dying first.

 

I have noticed an unrealistic number of hikers on Bumble. Given the hundreds of times I’ve read “hiking” and “climbing,” every trail in Virginia should be jammed with middle-aged men.

 

The students are using my whiteboard as a kind of message center now. They’ve partitioned off a corner for me, which was thoughtful, and have asked me to keep my instructional diagrams within the confines of a wavy-line-and-dot pattern. The concept is the work of Haven, a fifth-grade girl with beautiful penmanship and inexhaustible organizing propensities. I agreed to the request, because why not. Besides, so far at least, I like the board’s content. Today’s entries include the creation of a book exchange by a boy who needs Book Three of the Warrior Cats series, a nice drawing of a dragon, and two uplifting reminders: “Find The Music You Love,” one student has written, encircling the words in a flowering vine. “It’s okay if you mess up,” another assures, the words speech-bubbling from a toothy orange sun wearing shades. Haven noticed the theme too. She roped the sentences off with more wavy lines and slapped the word ENCOURAGEMENT at the top.

 

 

The blue minivan in the driveway means that Gretchen and her napping mother are here. My mouth is moving as I quietly plead for Mom to stay in the car, but Therapy Keith is wrong about manifesting your desires though positive thought.

“I’ll set my alarm,” she calls, walking toward the den.

 

 

I spend the evening eating olives directly from the jar. A lot of the Bumble profiles I read start with the same line: “Looking for my partner in crime.” Men who say this are the same men who choose Bumble’s prompt “the quickest way to their heart.” Then they all write the same answer: “through my chest.” I’m developing a gender-wide ick.

 

I head for the stairs, flipping off lights, locking doors. Daily tasks remain oblique marital references. I linger by the piano, reaching to play a phrase, then sit, pajamaed, to play another. I pick Mozart for its rationality, but my playing sounds severe.

In the morning, I trim the Christmas tree. It doesn’t take long. The ornaments are ironic now. I unwrap “Our First Home” from its tissue paper and send it sailing. The twenty-five silver bells, etched with dates, make sickening thunks as they hit the back of the kitchen trash can.

 

 

Mabel has practiced. You’ve got to hand it to her. Her “Red River Valley” is solid.

 

“I like what you’ve done with it,” I say. “The piece flows now—like musical sentences, telling the story. What do you think?”

“They’re not really sentences, though.”

 

And here we go.

 

“No, that’s true. The musical term we should be using is ‘phrase.’ ”

 

“Yeah, I don’t think of them as phrases, either.”

 

“Well, but they are phrases, actually.”

 

She shrugs. “Maybe.”

 

“Not maybe. That’s what they are. Those black lines over the notes are phrase markings.”

 

Silence.

 

“By definition.”

 

“Mmm.”

 

“What, mmm? It’s a fact.”

 

“It’s a fact to you.”

 

“It’s a fact, period. Unchangeable.”

 

“No, yeah. Unchangeable to you.”

 

I reach for my coffee and picture Mabel as Napoleon, jerking the crown from the hands of the Pope.

 

“It’s an F-sharp here,” I point. “Not F-natural,” I say. “As you played it.”

 

“What the fuck,” she mutters.

 

 

BillDean is outraged again. He wants his country back. He’s sick to death of safe spaces and pronouns and everyone and their goddamned woke.

 

“Woke?” I say.

 

He’s just come from a rally. “The Governor was there and he goddamned loves us. He thanked us and thanked us. No goddamned government is going to take my guns, and I’d love to see them try.”

 

He sounds like Yosemite Sam.

 

 

I scroll Bumble while the French press steeps. Therapy Keith would appreciate the consistency of my schedule.

“He’s standing next to a tank,” I say when my sister picks up. “In an ascot.”

 

“Stop,” she says.

 

“And get this,” I continue, reading the paragraph beneath the picture. “‘SWIPE LEFT if you work for the GOVERNMENT, are a scammer, STALKER, timewasting MORON, obsessed ex and her ‘entourage,’ or ENTITLED VEGAN LOSER.’”

 

“Just no.” My sister sounds sleepy.

 

I message him anyway.

 

“Oh,” he writes, “Those aren’t categories. Those are individual people. They know who they are.”

 

“Do you ever worry you seem, I don’t know, aggressive?”

 

He thanks me for being ladylike.

 

It’s not just the tank guy. “I’m sick of most of you,” one profile begins. “I’m not here to save you from your boring-ass life,” another warns. “Please be capable of intelligent conversation,” one specifies. There’s nothing wrong with that last request, I guess, except that there is.

 

 

My final student this evening is also my youngest. The boy is five, with tiny blue Crocs and a pregnant mom in tow, her spine bowed into the signature S of the third trimester. I don’t interact with many expectant mothers. I did when I was younger, but I’ve aged out of knowing the latest in maternity fashion or baby gear. My ideas of newborn gizmos would strike her as my mother’s struck me: out of touch. The woman is having a girl, she tells me. But sometime during the list of possible baby names—Harper, Daphne, Pippa—the avalanche happens. Feelings first, followed by discernable thoughts. Memories. The work stories he shared. The reoccurring names. Name. My ears begin to ring. And like finally seeing the image in one of those random dot auto-stereograms, those Magic Eye pictures, you wonder how you ever missed something so plain. Because what pregnant woman calls her boss between contractions?

 

“Wren’s in labor,” he’d said, walking back into the room a few minutes later. “Dilated to four,” he said, checking the ringer on his phone.

 

We visited Wren the following week. Rang her doorbell. Gift in hand. I greeted the baby first, then handed Pippa to my husband. He held her all evening. On the way home, he talked about the baby. When we pulled into our driveway a few minutes later, he was still talking about her. Until suddenly he wasn’t.

 

“I sent Wren an email today,” he said. “A forward, really. Of our first office interaction.”

 

He’d titled the forward “Look How Far We’ve Come.”

 

By the time I say all of this to my sister, later in the evening, I’ve thought of a parade of other incidents. Altered routines, suspicious locations, dodgy answers.

 

She says nothing.

 

“If you saw this many clues in a movie you’d be insulted,” I say, filling the silence, then I pause too. Because there’s no explaining how sick you feel when you realize someone’s found pure joy at your expense.

 

“The baby visit,” she says, finally. “How long ago was that?”

 

She’s trying to construct a timeline, but I already have.

 

Three years.

 

 

I spend the evening writing him an email.

 

“Hi” gets replaced with “Hello” then changed back to “Hi.”

 

Delete.

 

No salutation.

 

“How dare you,” I begin.

 

Delete.

 

“It has come to my attention,” I write.

 

Delete.

 

“I know that it’s Wren,” I write.

 

Then, hands shaking, I delete that too.

 

“I want the house.”

 

He waits twenty-four hours, then calls. I suspect his attorney has advised him, pointing out the danger of admitting anything in print. I put the phone on speaker, and set it on the coffee table, speaking to it from the doorway. Fifteen seconds later, the house is mine.

 

 

I’ve had it with Owen’s playing. It isn’t improving, and frankly, he’s making me question my ability to teach. My new plan is to ignore his fingers. I’ll focus on his sound.

 

“Can you do it?” I say, playing a string of round tones.

 

Owen plays his notes. Each is a cataclysmic event.

 

“Let’s play echo,” I say. “I’ll be the loud shout, and you’ll be the soft echo.”

 

He rubs his neck. Overhand. Underhand. Overhand again.

 

“Know what an echo is, buddy?”

 

I demonstrate, shouting “echo.”

 

He shouts back.

 

I echo him quietly.

 

He shouts again.

 

 

The staircase carpeting is loose. As Owen leaves, I give the lowest corner a yank. Disintegrated carpet backing flies up and rains down on my sneakers.

 

During Mabel’s lesson, I pull some more.

 

“What are you doing?”

 

“Nothing,” I call. “Your pedaling is late. Listen for clarity. One more time, please.”

 

The lowest step is free, and I’m admiring my own work when the playing stops again.

 

“Was that any better?” I’m asking because I forgot to listen, but she hears it as criticism and plays again. I walk to the kitchen for the dustpan.

 

Gretchen’s mother steps over the tiny demolition and sighs.

 

“I have a favor to ask you,” she says, pinning her hair while she talks. Oh god. I think. She wants to take a bath.

 

She asks me to drive her teenage son to an orthodontist appointment.

 

“No,” I say, and sigh back.

 

 

“Now just let me talk for a minute,” BillDean says, interrupting his own monologue. “It’s important that you understand what old BillDean is thinking when he plays.”

 

I count backward from ten before standing. I can see the lowest two risers. Pitted, raw wood. “Did you get my email?” I lie.

“I don’t read goddamned email.”

 

“No? About the rate increase?”

 

 

I pull carpet all evening. I’m wearing the asshole’s work gloves and using his vice grips. I took his toolbox when I left him. Traded, really. He got my wedding gown, which I assume he’s found by now. I hung it in his closet on my way out.

 

 

I don’t know what percentage of Bumble men use fake names, but I suspect the number is high. Mr. Love just wants someone to listen to him. Big Daddy gets “way too excited about God.” Sometimes the fake names are too explicit, forcing Bumble to moderate the information. These men are renamed, aptly, as “Moderated.” Moderated, 54 is “brutally honest.” Moderated, 49 is “fluent in sarcasm.” Moderated, 53 “isn’t angry.” I wonder what he isn’t angry about.

 

 

The carpeting on the third stair is impossibly stuck. It’s affixed by something called a tack strip, which I hadn’t encountered yet. I pry it up with a butter knife, but the removal leaves a deep trench in the wood.

 

“Wood filler,” my sister says.

 

“Maybe,” I say. “There should be a name for that heavy feeling, ya know?” I cradle the phone, tipping the omelet pan, watching the egg turn white.

 

“What feeling?”

 

“You know, that feeling you have where you’re grief-stricken, but you just propel yourself forward anyway? I bet the Germans have a word for it. One of those multisyllabic compound words. Google it.”

 

“German words for complex emotions,” she says. I can hear her typing. “I see leibeskummer, but—”

 

“What’s it mean?”

 

“Translates to ‘lovesickness.’ ”

 

“Gross. No. Needs more grief.”

 

“‘Grief,’ ” she says slowly. We’ve got Trauer.”

 

“Okay, but add the dragging around.”

 

“She laughs. ‘Perseverance.’ Beharren.”

 

Okay. Smash them together.

 

Beharrentrauer?”

 

“Yeah. Closer.”

 

 

The students are asking where my husband is. Not that they typically saw him during their lessons. Maybe they’ve noticed that my wedding band is gone, or spotted the indentation it’s left. Or maybe the timing of the questions is coincidental. Regardless, it’s the fourth time this week I’ve felt ashamed to be single, and I’m pretty sure this makes me a terrible feminist.

 

Three students ask if I “live alone.”

 

“Live alone now?” one says.

 

“Where’s your husband?” one blurts.

 

I should say, “I don’t have a husband,” or, “Open your music.”

 

Instead, I say, “He’s at work.”

 

 

Owen is dropped off by a sitter today. It is date night for his parents.

 

Mabel and her brother are staying with an aunt. Their parents are on a cruise. BillDean tells me that he and Hildy have been married for fifty-two years.

 

This makes me exactly half as lovable as BillDean, mathematically speaking.

 

Therapy Keith says your worth isn’t wrapped up in another’s perception of you. But his need to say it suggests a lot of people believe otherwise.

 

 

I have eleven new likes this morning. One especially torpid-looking man dates only “fit” women.

 

“How fit?” I type, clicking past a photo of him, his left hand deep in a bag of Funyuns. “Like, how far would I need to be able to run? Is there a distance or pace I should train toward?”

 

He asks for a full-length picture.

 

I send a photo of Emily Blunt.

 

 

AlligatorBoots closes his profile paragraph with an apology: “Unable to send pictures of p3ni$. Camera lacks wide-angle lens.”

 

 

I assign Mabel a beautiful arrangement of “Greensleeves.”

 

“Some people think Henry the Eighth wrote the tune,” I say, but then wonder how accurate this is.

 

“Divorced, beheaded, died,” she begins.

 

She’s right. We substitute “Carol of the Bells.”

 

“Set your right hand to autopilot,” I call from the front hall, looking up the staircase. “Because it’s just the same four notes over and over. And the best part?” I say, picking up the carpet’s edge and yanking. “You get to clamp the pedal down. B-flat, third finger, and right foot on the pedal. Keep your heel down and go for it.”

 

I know more about the other woman than I want to admit. I know from him that she’s the youngest child of a single mom. I know she grew up in Pensacola and spent her summers on the beach.

 

I fold the carpet under and tighten his vice grips.

 

Hark how the bells

 

Sweet silver bells

 

“Yes on the notes,” I call. “But no to your rhythm. Two eighths in the middle. Think long-short-short-long.

 

She carries on. By repetition four, it’s improving.

 

I know she carries Cheez-Its in her purse. Is addicted to ChapStick.

 

“Yes, but how many measures, Mabel? Count the bars before your left hand comes in.”

 

“Eight?”

 

“Good. Start again?”

 

The scar on her neck is from a dog bite, and she didn’t even have the dog put down. That’s how he always put it. Didn’t even have the dog put down.

 

The fourth stair releases with a pop. I reach for my butter knife to pry up the tack strip. She rode horses as a kid. Crushed on her middle school band director. Loves Gilmore Girls.

 

Christmas is here.

 

Bringing good cheer

 

To young and old

 

Meek and the bold

 

“Wow, yes,” I call. “Start again, but soft pedal with your left foot this time. Let it off in measure five and build.”

Except for a missing E-flat, she’s error free.

 

Her curtain bangs were his idea. So was finishing her doctorate. “One of the most talented up-and-comers in the field.”

“Ambitious,” he called her.

 

Merry Merry Merry Merry Christmas

 

Merry Merry Merry Merry Christmas

 

Mabel’s scale passage is halting, but every note is there.

 

“Thumb under on the G.”

 

I set down the knife, clamping his vice.

 

She plays the passage again, then again. It’s almost fluid.

 

“Now from the beginning,” I say, removing his gloves and descending the stairs.

 

I listen from my chair and smile when she’s done. She’s on her way. The piece just needs continuity now—the kind that organizes small moments into something bigger.

 

“Long lines, okay?” I say.

 

She nods.

 

I tuck her copy of “Carol of the Bells” into her spiral notebook and scrawl “you’ve got this” across the top.

 

 

I pull carpet all evening, first with his gloves, then without. I don’t know when he started bringing her home in his mind, but I see now that she was there. In the mornings when he packed the Lean Cuisines. In the evenings on his walks. She sat with us at dinner. She watched him barely eat. And in those lapses when he hardly spoke, so lost in thought, I know now that he was speaking to her. She was with him when he couldn’t sit still and when he worked too long, even from our sofa, and somehow, in his duplicitous state, she was in his mind when he fell asleep with his head on my lap, the last night I ever saw him. Maybe she was in his mind when he handed me coffee or ate lunch from the red-lidded Pyrex. Maybe she stood with him while he cleaned the kitchen, shooing me toward the piano.

 

I worked my way to the top of the staircase today. Below me, Mabel played her “Carol of the Bells.” It’s cohesive now, a proper narrative, and she knows it.

 

“Well?” I said, catching her eye as I dragged the carpet out the door.

 

“Good,” she said. “I’m playing lines.”

 

And not segments.

Share

Notes from Four-Tenths of a Daughter

The men next to me at work won’t stop
rattling on about the one-child policy, how desperately
China needed it, how necessary it was for economic sociologic
environmental psychological progress, humanity requires
logical advancement, this was the most effective protocol.
They carry on as if I weren’t close enough to see the spit
contracting from their mouths, two only children,
childless sons whose mothers cried,
relieved when the ultrasound projected undeveloped
shadows pointing the right way, relieved at securing
their value, which is an uncoded way to say,
their safety. The birth rate dropped 3x in just 20
years, did you hear, it’s only 1.4 kids per person now, as if anyone
could give birth, as if the 1.4 did not mean
a full son & four-tenths of a daughter, as if second
children were not occasionally allowed if the first
was female, or severely disabled, or dead, as if
my mother did not confess to me, crying
that her firstborn would have been
a son had he not swum away, as if I did not feel
like my life were a clearance aisle consolation prize,
as if. Behind me, my boss slams shut
her laptop, retorts while leaving, You don’t know
the suffering people went through. The men don’t
slip a beat. I shrink smaller
behind my monitor, remember
Féng Jiànméi, how at 23, she chose to give
another life, how at 7 months, she was forced
into a van, blindfolded, to sign away nothing
she didn't already know, that when her child arrived
still, she knew it was from the two long needles
they sharpened through her abdomen. I’m at that stage
of perceived womanhood where once a month,
someone asks me my intentions for the future: will you
ever want a child? I gently remind them of our ongoing
ecological catastrophe, & who could forget, our astronomical
inflation. Me? A mom? … In this economy?
But really, I never want to suffer
another life with my genes. I’m terrified of the possibility
of the egg coalescing into a daughter, of having
to teach her why her body will feel like a beautiful
layered cake, one the rest of the world
will gaze & feast upon, one that she might
never learn to taste.
Share

Satire and Catharsis: A Conversation with Charlie Green

The Shah of Texas
Charlie Green
Gold Wake Press
$24.95
2025






Leona Strong: You wrote this book across two U.S. presidencies, yet it spoke to me as a comment on the present day, 2025. What inspired you to write a satirical book of this nature at this point in history? Was there a particular political or social event that triggered the idea for the book? And how do you hope that the book speaks to current events (if you do)?

 

Charlie Green: In 2013 I wrote seventy-five terrible pages that were the first seed of the novel. I was frustrated by the rehabilitation of George W. Bush, and I wanted to make fun of both his public stupidity and the cruelty of his policies. But I put it aside because it seemed a little too ridiculous. Then in 2017, watching the monstrous beginning of the Trump administration, I was frustrated to hear so many people say, “This makes me miss George W. Bush.” He’s responsible for at least 500,000 dead in Iraq! We don’t get to Trump without so many precedents of the Bush administration! So I started writing just to entertain myself and to get a little catharsis through making jokes. I shared some of the jokes with my friend Nick, and his encouragement kept me writing and got me thinking more seriously about the project.

 

I kept Trump aside as much as possible while writing, in part because it was hard to stop thinking about him during the day and I wanted a break, and in part because I kept referring to some of the worst violence caused by the U.S. during the 20th century. I had a sense that some of the jokes would remind people of Trump, but I didn’t see much purpose in joking in a novel about an administration that somehow did something worse every day. I needed a little more distance. I hope the novel gives readers catharsis through laughter, and even though the humor is dark, I want it to provide some kind of hope. Trump isn’t completely sui generis, which means we can figure out how to fight his ideology and administration, even when it seems so bleak.

 

Leona Strong: Your characters have interesting names: “Dick Dick Dick Dick Dick,” Robert Toose, Adiel S. Thomas, Holly Unlikely, Maude Lynn. Pynchonesque, perhaps? Yet we don’t learn the Shah’s real name until we near the end, which also seems important. Would you talk about the significance and weight of names here?

 

Charlie Green: I definitely had Pynchon in mind as a touchstone for the novel in many ways. But I was thinking a lot more of Stanley Kubrick’s Dr. Strangelove. One of my favorite lines is “Colonel Bat Guano, if that really is your name.” I love that movie so much. It pushes gallows humor so far, and I tried to see if/how I could mimic that on the page.

 

Once I started writing, ridiculous names kept popping up in my head. Sometimes the names would come up for a character I was already writing or considering, and some names invited me to create a character. That helped me figure out the novel’s tone too. I wanted to intensify the artificiality of the novel, and names were a quick way to establish the world. (I’m a little sad I scrapped a character named Exposition Jones, but there wasn’t room for him.)

 

Leona Strong: The narrator addresses the reader frequently. Sometimes this is done with a mocking tone, sometimes conciliatory, sometimes as a humorous aside, and sometimes there seems a genuine attempt to educate. What relationship would you like the reader to have built with the narrator by book’s end?

 

Charlie Green: That’s such a good question. In an early draft, the narrator was a much fuller character. He had a plot arc that developed in the footnotes. At first it was a way for me to process how I felt about writing the book. I also like pompous narrators (and can be pretty pompous myself), and I like the idea of a narrator who loses track of themself because of the story they’re telling. Toni Morrison’s novel Jazz does that to great effect.

 

The novel has a character who serves, more or less, as a moral center, but I wanted a figure who presented just how deranging it is to see the contrast between the reality of Bush’s presidency and the nostalgia for it. That kind of character can be both a moral center and combative with their audience. Plus, it felt a little ridiculous to write a novel given the state of the world.

 

Also, writing a novel is fucking exhausting. I made a rule for myself to write down every thought, idea, image, phrase, etc., so I wrote a lot of my own writing frustrations down in the footnotes and discovered that they added a meaningful dimension to the story and how it’s told.

 

Leona Strong: There are numerous political and social statements made throughout the novel. What questions would you like readers to come away asking themselves? Or what do you hope they’ve learned?

 

Charlie Green: I hope they see some of the precedents for Trump from the mid-20th century on. I also decided to include references to things that the reader might not know and would be curious about to the point that they’d look things up. Mainly, though, I wanted to remind myself and readers of how awful the Bush administration was. Being nostalgic for his disastrous rule makes cruel and illegal actions seem acceptable, and no part of me wants to accept those years as normal.

 

Leona Strong: You coin some terrific neologisms. Some of my favorites were “flatterize,” “complimentate,” and “edufied,” but there are dozens. Did these arise from a particular zany place?

 

Charlie Green: I had Bush’s fights with the English language in mind (“make the pie higher”; “misunderestimated”; “families is where nations find hope, where wings take dream”). He grew up in a wealthy family and went to Yale, but he both pretended to be a down-home yokel and spoke some of the dumbest errors into the language of any major political figure. I also grew up on jokes from The Simpsons (“A noble spirit embiggens the smallest man”/”it’s a perfectly cromulent word”; Homer getting so excited about a trampoline that he keeps mangling the word). This isn’t a sophisticated reason: it was fun.

 

Leona Strong: Who are your literary influences and heroes?

 

Charlie Green: Immediately relevant to the novel, in no particular order: Pynchon, Kurt Vonnegut, Fran Ross’ Oreo; Jonathan Swift, George Saunders, Ishmael Reed, Margaret Atwood, Philip Roth.

 

Less relevant (or not at all) to the novel: Vladimir Nabokov (especially Lolita and Pale Fire), Toni Morrison (especially Song of Solomon), Marquez (especially One Hundred Years of Solitude and Chronicle of a Death Foretold, George Eliot (especially Middlemarch), and James Baldwin (too much to list).

 

Leona Strong: I love that your book incorporates many nontraditional techniques. Conversations presented as interviews (of sorts), illustrations, redacted conversations and memos, textbook pages, and blank pages that invite the reader to “fill in” their own descriptions if they choose. What drew you to this off-center approach?

 

Charlie Green: One of my very favorite novels is Laurence Sterne’s Tristram Shandy. It has images, a blank page, ridiculous wordplay, characters beyond reason and reality. I love that he parodied the novel so early in the history of the European novel. Because writing a novel in response to Bush and Trump felt a little futile, satire about the novel felt like the right move. Novels don’t have the cultural reach they once did. Also, I love writing that incorporates what people think of as “non-literary” texts. That gives the world of the novel a different kind of texture, as well as space for humor.

 

Leona Strong: How much historical research did you have to do as you wrote? Did any of your research surprise you and/or lead you down a path you hadn’t intended when you began?

 

Charlie Green: I did re-read material about Abu Ghraib from the time those revelations were made public, as well as how different politicians and journalists tried to downplay those revelations. But so much of that was still very vivid in my head, due to the leaked images. The Iraq War and its aftermath was not quite as vivid in my head, and I was shocked to rediscover how much I had forgotten that had enraged me.

What shows less are the rabbit holes I went down about 20th century precedents for Bush and Trump, and right-wing economics. I knew much of that material pretty superficially, and reading in more depth about Operation Mongoose led me to various other CIA horrors and the fact that the word shrapnel comes from the inventor’s name. I started to feel like a mad conspiracy theorist because I wanted to shout “Look at this! This is how we got where we are!” Except everything I was learning was well-established by the evidence. (The Clinton administration sent Haitian refugees to Guantanamo Bay; the Obama administration intensified the drone bombings that killed an American and his sixteen-year-old son abroad.)

 

Leona Strong: Do you have any new projects in the works? If so, can you give us a hint about what we might expect next?

 

Charlie Green: I’m not sure I have another novel that ridiculous in me. The anger I felt was such an enormous driver, and the fiction I’ve worked on since has been much more grounded. I’m fascinated by how Americans, individually and writ large, see themselves in whatever arc of American history that they know, and I’ve been working on a novel about different Americans across time and geography trying to align the history they believe in with the world at odds with that history.

 


Charlie Green

Originally from Arkansas, Charlie Green teaches in the Department of Literatures in English at Cornell University. His novel The Shah of Texas was published this year. His collection of poems, Feral Ornamentals, was published in 2021 by Finishing Line Press. His writing has appeared in Image, The New England Review, and The Southeast Review, among other venues.

The Shah of Texas (novel)

Feral Ornamentals (poems)

 

 

 


Share

Review: Everything Is Tuberculosis by John Green

Review of: Everything Is Tuberculosis, by John Green; Crash Course Books; $28.00; 208 pages; March 18, 2025

Review by Jordan Alexander

 

In January, 2025, the Dr. Phillips Center for the Performing Arts in Orlando, Florida, held “An Evening with Author John Green.” Over the twenty years since the publication of his first book, Looking for Alaska, Green has worn many hats: YA author, YouTuber, essayist, and most recently, tuberculosis (TB) activist. In January, he was promoting his newest book Everything Is Tuberculosis. Over the last few years, Green has shared the history of this notorious disease across his social media platforms, but at his talk, he spoke about the other subject of the book, his friendship with Henry Reider, a TB survivor he met while doing charity work in Sierra Leone. Green recalled his first encounter with Henry at Lakka Government Hospital. Henry, enthusiastic and friendly, guided Green around the hospital. Green assumed that he was the child of the hospital staff, reminded of Green’s then nine-year-old son, who shares the same name. But Henry was not nine; he was seventeen. He was not a child of a staff member, but a patient suffering from drug-resistant tuberculosis. Meeting Henry revealed to Green a global health crisis, one that he spent years researching, resulting in Everything Is Tuberculosis.

 

Green’s book draws our attention to an issue most people in the West aren’t aware exists. In the United States, we tend to think of tuberculosis as a disease of frail nineteenth century poets, a relic. This is because TB has been curable since the 1950s. Yet, tuberculosis remains humanity’s deadliest disease, “killing around one in seven people who’ve ever lived.” Inadequacies in healthcare, poverty, and predatory pharmaceutical companies inhibit tuberculosis treatment in impoverished countries, especially in the Global South. This is the discrepancy Green discovered when he met Henry, and the discrepancy he illuminates through the book.

 

Everything Is Tuberculosis is not a medical textbook. There is no sterile, academic language. Green writes in a conversational, welcoming voice reminiscent of a Brian Doyle essay. Readers familiar with Green’s work will recognize this style from his other nonfiction work, The Anthropocene Reviewed. Green’s writings on tuberculosis are also interspersed with his personal stories, rendering the scientific and historical explorations accessible. “Statistics do a lot of work,” Green said in an interview with Scientific American, “but what really moves us is human stories.”

 

​Human stories lie at the heart of Everything Is Tuberculosis. Early in the book, Green introduces Henry in a way that creates an emotional connection between Henry and the reader: “He had some of the mannerisms of my son, the same paradoxical mixture of shyness and enthusiastic desire for connection.” Henry’s story frames the book’s historical dive into tuberculosis. We care about Robert Koch and Romantic poets because we care about Henry, and we want to understand the chain of dominoes that led to his illness.

 

After Henry’s introduction, Green traces the web of tuberculosis and its connections to everything from World War I to Sherlock Holmes. Green contextualizes Henry’s illness through historical episodes, reminding us of the “omnipresence of history.” Green writes: “Henry was sick not really because of Koch’s bacillus, but because of historical forces, the ones we’ve encountered here . . . His illness was a product of Sierra Leone’s centuries-long impoverishment, of a healthcare system hollowed out by colonization and war and Ebola.” The omnipresence of history looms over the text in the same way it looms over Henry’s life and the lives of tuberculosis sufferers across the globe.

 

Green also details the history of Sierra Leon, breaking down misconceptions about the Global South before those misconceptions creep up. “There is nothing inevitable or natural about the impoverishment of countries like Sierra Leone,” Green writes. He traces the systemic issues plaguing Sierra Leon to early imperialism and colonization. He doesn’t just describe the inadequate healthcare system in the country; he demonstrates precisely what historical events created those circumstances.

 

Everything Is Tuberculosis is, ultimately, an exercise in profound empathy. To understand the realities of tuberculosis, Green argues, we must first empathize with the communities most vulnerable to the disease. Green demonstrates this empathy through the use of personal anecdotes, moments in which memoir informs the medical and historical details. In one scene, Green speaks with a tuberculosis patient in Sierra Leone who struggles to take his medication consistently. The patient explains the drug’s side effects. He must be watched by someone while he takes them, which only exaggerates the difficulty. TB patients who live far from hospitals must make weekly treks just to take their medication. There is also a stigma associated with having tuberculosis; the patients at Lakka are isolated and have been abandoned by family and friends because of their illness. All of these factors lead to patients who are considered “noncompliant.” Green commiserates with the man, sharing his own struggles to take his daily medications. “It’s hard for some people, myself included, to take medicine,” he writes, “But I can’t very well blame others for not finishing their antibiotics when I know how often I’ve failed to finish my own.” Green encourages greater empathy for TB patients and their struggles with treatment. For Green, empathy and understanding are essential weapons in the fight to eradicate tuberculosis.

 

At the Dr. Phillips Center, Green shared a sentiment that also features in the book: “We tend to solve the problems we pay the most attention to.” Everything Is Tuberculosis is Green’s attempt to redirect humanity’s attention to one of our species’ oldest injustices.

Share

The Other

Sven Birkerts

 

I am here in my room upstairs, at my desk, and she is here with me—Andy, the painter. She’s just outside the window. I’ve been working, trying to carry on amid the sounds of scraping, hammering, long extension ladders being notched, trying to ignore the scratchy shushing sound of primer being applied, and Andy’s flat gray buzz cut which every so often comes into view in the bottom of the window to my right.

 

It’s strange—this person utterly unknown to me maybe six feet away, her labor utterly unlike mine. She is so high up, so intent on what she’s doing, that I feel my work is no work at all, privileged idling at best, and if she were to step one rung higher, she would see me, elbows on desk, forehead cradled in the fingers of both hands, staring at the illuminated patch in front of me.

 

Whatever I was planning on writing has been redirected, sent back, because the only thing I can think of now is Andy right there, the stranger at my window. She is a stranger in that she is someone I don’t know. But her look and demeanor make her stranger still. She is tall and sinewy, aged anywhere from forty to sixty, old blue tattoos running the length of her arms. She wears glasses and has an intensely quizzical way of looking at me when we talk. Her face is long, drawn, but when she smiles, I see a mouthful of huge teeth. She has earbuds in and listens to who knows what all day long. And here she is now, the flat gray top inching up—forehead, eyes studying her brush, immersed in a private world that I can’t even conceive of.

 

There is always the matter of otherness, which starts close to home with the otherness of family, and ultimately encompasses the whole great world. What is my wife thinking right now, my son? With family, long familiarity allows some illusion of knowing, assumptions not countered because they are seldom voiced. But here, now, with this woman at my window, I have nothing to go on. Is she married? No sign. My guess, unfounded and based on visual stereotypes, is that she has a partner, a woman. When she takes her lunch break, I see her sitting hunched over on the porch step, talking into her cell phone with private animation. Partner, lover? When she talks, she appears heated, possibly arguing.

 

I don’t know where she lives. I haven’t asked. She could live anywhere in the area. She mentioned to Lynn in some context that she used to be a chef in a restaurant. Is that possible? I can’t see it. On another occasion she asks Lynn what she does. Lynn answers that she works as a therapist. Andy nods enthusiastically. She does too, she gives therapy on Zoom.

 

With some puzzles, though the pieces are scattered, you trust that with enough patience and skill a picture can be assembled. I don’t have that trust. Each new bit of information is confounding, unconnected. For one thing, she is vigilant. No matter where she is working, she keeps track of the other painters. It’s as if she thinks they are talking about her, but just out of earshot. On the carpenter’s last day, I gave him a bottle of whiskey, and Andy somehow found this out. The first thing she said the next day was, “So, Kevin got a big bottle of Jack Daniels…” He did, I said. Then, scrambling, I asked, “What’s your poison?” She didn’t hesitate an instant. “Tito’s.”

 

It’s what philosophers call ‘the problem of other minds.’ Each a kind of black box that can never be retrieved. I would enlarge that, in this case, to include ‘the problem of other lives.’ I can only make guesses. A small house near one of the towns north of here, a fence-in yard with dogs? I’m full of classist clichés. Maybe she has an apartment in Northampton, or Greenfield? Maybe she goes home, changes, and gets to work in the kitchen. Chicken? Poached salmon? Or did she pick up something from Subway? Does she turn up the music in the car when she drives? Would it be metal, or country, or opera? Later at night: nightly news, CSI, or a documentary on fly-fishing, her passion?

 

I’ve been told I ask a lot of questions, sometimes with insinuations that I snoop. I do, both. I realized just now, writing this, what it is I’m doing. I am making pictures, connecting things—what my daughter and I used to call ‘detectiving.’ As if by imagining aspects of a life, I can get purchase. Sometimes I feel that I do. But watching this woman, her gray flattop right here at window level, I know I have not the slightest idea.

Share

Brother My Brother

Poetry by Shann Ray and Art by James Black

 

Brother My Brother draws from the brotherhood shared by Southern Cheyenne and Arapaho ledger artist James Black and Czech American poet Shann Ray opening a doorway into the powerful love among brothers worldwide. Cherishing intimacy while refusing to look away from humanity’s capacity for violence, this book engages the genocidal weight of history alongside the thermonuclear missile crisis proliferating globally in the present day. The visual art of James Black and the poems of Shann Ray offer a sense of fearlessness accompanied by peace and well-being against the imminent threat of annihilation. To hold the beloved’s face, to speak love not hate, to see blackbirds rise from a winter field and hear the quiet breathing of horses–to give witness to the beauty of wilderness and the beauty of the human heart. Brother My Brother takes as its project the reconciliation of people and nations.

 


 

 

Sister Who Saved Her Brother — Battle of Rosebud Creek

colored pencil and ink on ledger paper from 1895, 11 x 17”

 

 

… ^

only first notice

with me the Aggregat

series (German for “aggregate”)

a set of ballistic missile designs developed from

1933-1945 by a research

Program of Nazi Germany’s

Armed Forces (the Wehr-

macht) and remember even

now its greatest success was

the A4 more commonly

known as the V-2 fuel

ethanol and liquid oxygen

the 80s brought nuclear fear

but today its quite different

notice how there’s not near

as much jumping under desks

or wailing of loud sirens

or visiting bomb shelters

now everything’s different

 

 

… ^

notice too

the Kaliningrad K-5

(NATO reporting name AA-1 Alkali)

also known as RS-1U or product ShM

an early Soviet

air-to-air missile

with a speed of 800

meters per second

and beam riding

guidance that in later

years was replaced by

a beam-riding seeker

with infrared semi-active

radar homing for

missiles now given

the name heat seekers

 

 

… ^

notice too

the AIM-9 Sidewinder

(where “AIM” stands for

“Air Intercept Missile”)

a short-range air-to-air missile

which entered service with the United States

Navy in 1956 and was subsequently adopted

by the US Air Force in 1964

and since then the Sidewinder

has proved to be an enduring

international success so its latest

variants remain standard

equipment in most Western-aligned

air forces but don’t forget the Soviet

K-13 (AA-2 ‘Atoll’) a reverse-

Engineered copy of the AIM-9B

which was also widely adopted

by a number of nations such that

these newer seekers with rocket

motors can also equip attack helicopters

for greater kill force please recognize

these as among the oldest lowest cost

missiles also don’t forget the US Navy

hosted a 50th-anniversary celebration

for the Sidewinder in 2002 and Boeing

won a contract in 2010 to support

Sidewinder operations through 2055

 

 

… ^

today missiles

with names from A to Z

carry thermonuclear warheads

flying the earth wherever we ask

them to fly leaving and reentering the atmosphere

with pinpoint accuracy exoatmospheric kill vehicles

yes EKVs ride fast

so please remember

the ancient prophecy:

when you see standing

in the holy place

the abomination that

causes desolation flee

to the mountains let no

one on the rooftop go

down to take anything

from the house let no

one go back to the field

to get their cloak it will

be dreadful for pregnant

women and nursing

mothers pray that your

flight will not take place

in winter or on the day

of rest there will be great

distress unequaled from

the beginning of the world

and never to be equaled

again please note it says

if those days are not cut

short no one will survive

and wherever there is a

carcass there the vultures

will gather but be not afraid

for as lightning that comes

from the east is visible in

the west so will be the

coming of the prince of peace

 

 

Sister Who Saved Her Brother — Battle of Rosebud Creek, Detail #2

colored pencil and ink on ledger paper from 1895, 5.5 x 5.5”

 

 

… ^

we

declare

the Arrow or Hetz

(Hebrew: חֵץ, pronounced [ˈχet͡s])

a family of anti-ballistic missiles

designed to fulfill an Israeli requirement

for a missile defense

system that would be

more effective against

ballistic missiles than

the Patriot surface-to-air

missile jointly funded

and produced by Israel

and the United States

development of the system

began in 1986 and it has

continued since drawing

contested criticism yet still

undertaken by Israel Aerospace

Industries (IAI) and Boeing

it is overseen by the Israeli

Ministry of Defense’s Homa

(Hebrew: חומה, pronounced

[χoma] “rampart”) administration

and the U.S. Missile Defense

Agency it forms the long-range

layer of Israel’s multi-tiered missile

defense system along with David’s

Sling (at medium-to-long range)

both Iron Dome and Iron Beam

(at short ranges) and note it is warhead

directed high explosive fragmentation

flight ceiling exoatmospheric

 

 

… ^

please note

the al-Husayn

(Arabic: الحسین, romanized:

al-Husayn) “little beautiful one”

a short-range ballistic missile developed

in Ba’athist Iraq an

upgraded version of

the Scud missile the

al-Husayn was widely

used by the Iraqi Army

during the Iran–Iraq

War and the Persian

Gulf War weight nearly

15,000 pounds warhead

1,102 pounds of payload

high explosive chemical

biological and nuclear

capabilities but also note

fuselage and warhead prone

to break into fragments while

reentering the atmosphere

 

 

… ^

see

the Aspide

(the Italian name for

the asp) an Italian missile

produced by Selenia (then by Alenia

Aeronautica now a part

of Leonardo S.p.A.) it

is very similar to

the American Sparrow

an echo design is the

UK’s Skyflash the Asp

uses the same airframe

as the Sparrow but an

inverse monopulse

seeker far more accurate

and much less susceptible

to electronic countermeasures

(ECMs) than the original

conical scanning the Asp

also has original electronics

and warhead a new more

powerful engine with closed-

loop hydraulics for better

downrange maneuverability

and different control surfaces

replacing the original triangular

wings with a newly designed

common cropped delta fixed

wing maximum speed Mach 4

(4x the speed of sound) explosive

force open torque from a four tube

Asp/Sparrow launcher boxlike indifferent

 

 

… ^

note

the Type 01 LMAT

(01式軽対戦車誘導弾,

01-shiki kei-tai-sensha yūdō-dan)

a Japanese man-portable fire-and-forget

Anti-Tank Missile

(ATM) development

began in 1993 at

Kawasaki Heavy

Industries and was

accepted into service

in 2001 during

development the

missile was designated

with the codename

XATM-5 later it was

known briefly as the

ATM-5 not modeled

after the deadliest anti-

tank missile known as

the Javelin the ATM-5

unit cost $250,000 the

weapon employs a

sophisticated Command

Launch Unit (CLU) that

is re-loaded for multiple

firings reliant on kinetic

energy through shaped

charge explosives using

the Munroe effect to

penetrate heavy armor

the charge collapses a

metal liner inside the

warhead into a high-

velocity shaped charge jet

capable of penetrating

armor steel to a depth of

seven or more times the

diameter of the charge

and can be delivered

without the high velocity

required by armor-piercing

devices and thus less recoil

 

 

Sister Who Saved Her Brother — Battle of Rosebud Creek, Detail #1

colored pencil and ink on ledger paper from 1895, 5.5 x 5.5”

 


James Black

Both Cheyenne and Arapaho, artist James Black is a Southern Cheyenne Sundance priest and ledger artist. A descendent of Black Kettle, the renowned Cheyenne peace chief, and two of the original Fort Marion ledger artists of the 1800s, Cohoe and Making Medicine, through his art James honors his people today.

 

 

 

 

 

 


Shann Ray

American Book Award winner Shann Ray teaches leadership and forgiveness studies at Gonzaga University, and poetry for Stanford and the Center for Contemplative Leadership at Princeton Theological Seminary. Czech American, he grew up near Lame Deer, Montana, on the Northern Cheyenne reservation.

Share

Sonnet for trigger → obsessional doubt → consequence

Erica Dawson

 

The surgeon left my ovaries intact.

And, once a month, they still release an egg

which slowly rots beside my spine, in back,

my spleen, in front, between my ribs. I beg

you, menopause, come sooner than later.

Filled with half-lives, degrading, in my hollows,

I know mother nature always caters

to men, their bodies stronger, so it follows

I should break down. But what if each egg was a spore

that could give rise to something new without

a man. Maybe just a tiny core

of a human. Some fifty guts to stomach the doubt

of whether or not my body is blameless,

if it’s awful to survive being buried in darkness.

Share

Miss Lorenz

Clint Margrave

 

should’ve been sipping wine in a Paris café,

but instead she drank Folgers

 

and taught passé composé

to a bunch of acne-faced inmates

 

in the asylum known as Canyon High School.

I’m not sure how she imagined her life

 

when she took that degree

in a Romance language,

 

but it had to have more romance

than kicking Carl Mulligan out

 

of class for wearing a Cramps t-shirt

that said, “Can Your Pussy Do the Dog?”

 

It had to be more French than busting

15-year-old metalheads hotboxing

 

Camels by the chain link fence

behind her classroom wall.

 

But everyone has bills to pay.

Everyone has a bouche to feed,

 

even if it’s only your own.

Miss Lorenz must be retired now.

 

I like to imagine her living

out these late years eating mussels

 

under a red awning in Montparnasse

or sampling Beaujolais Nouveau

 

at a little round table by the Seine

or maybe just taking in the view

 

from her own backyard

of all that’s in the distance.

Share

make a poem out of nothing

JC Talamantez

 

maybe some men just

 

    amass an immovable nature

 

your father would’ve turned sixty today

 

    —a few times at his mother’s / you could be alone with him

 

he returning—military—

from some place you didn’t understand

 

put headphones so you wouldn’t watch Halloween—he loved horror movies

 

and dark legs land-bound on the precise blanket

 

   below a window riot

   of apricot, on hill country summer

 

   paint each leaf

 

but an absent father’s jovial Spanish, is still just a man

you don’t know

 

and he was in the sky missing feathers

Share

Two Poems

Jess Yuan

 

BIOSPHERE

The bowl of Los Angeles dreams of stretching over itself
            a skin, a bubble
 
of conditioned air. Strung with light, the city bleeds
            and swells
 
like a mosquito bite itching up the globe, inflamed by that little siphon.
            Whining up
 
and down the highway for miles, each oil derrick nods agreement
            with the others.
 
In the city itself, they are hidden behind hollow facades
            lining the road
 
to the corporation’s glass shell. How does the glassworks installer
            resolve the seam
 
where one adjoins another? Two curves are held together
            with structural silicone.
 
A scab hardens two sides of flesh into place.
            I keep picking
 
where its texture invites a fingernail. Two thousand
            man-hours per year,
 
two million man-hours per millennium. How many man-hours
            to start over?
 
 There is no starting over.
 

CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION

after quitting, every day
I thank heaven I’ll never
 
have to see another building again
nor fear them hanging over me
 
except when I walk
through this world tied together
 
by so many other hands
and when I enter and sleep and possess
 
each adjacent item as mine
then all of it hangs over me
 
a single bulb but at least
the naked filament
 
has a hard enough time
lighting what it is
 
to reveal anything else
at least the empty stage
 
can sometimes turn away
after telling a good joke
 
with a straight face
while the breeze enters
 
as a new neighbor
and then the storm.

Share

Two Poems

Jose Hernandez Diaz

Ode to the Weekend

Time to break free of routine
By jumping into another routine
Watching too many sports on a plethora

Of cable channels teams I grew up

 

Watching based solely on proximity

Now I root for them for life

Organize schedule around games
What season is it check the sport on TV

 

Football means pumpkin patch

Halloween Thanksgiving

Basketball spring lilacs Easter

Baseball in the summertime

 

Besides beachside barbecues

The weekend means relatively loose
Like prose poetry aesthetics or anti-aesthetics

Spontaneous open to discovery

 

Whereas weekday grind feels more

Like Poetry with a capital “P”
Like Shakespeare’s sonnets

On meter rhyming and on point

 

Ode to the Skateboard

When I was young, I wanted to ride you
But it was hard to find the right balance

 

Settled for the smoother less hip longboard
More convenient, less falling on the pavement

 

Skating was born in southern California
Like Hollywood cinema or Burritos with French Fries

 

Inside of them when we were young

My friends all skated or played sports

 

Free and unassuming no responsibilities

Now they’ve mostly traded it in for blue-collar jobs

 

And picture-perfect families to support

The skateboard, however, remains an iconic

 

West coast symbol of freedom, irreverence,

Expression, though it can also simultaneously

 

Be found at the Olympics on mainstream commercials

Selling the timeless image of youth and vigor

 

Seems far from early gritty days of Venice Beach

Boardwalk before bohemian Venice

 

Became gentrified by millionaires, techies,

Venture capitalists, not necessarily

 

Complaining just observing evolution

Besides purity is for saints and martyrs

Share

Two Poems

Jane Zwart

Plots

I know: people want roads. They want room
for paths to fork and converge. A story is better
if its hero might be lost, if no one has taken
reversal off the table. But a great plot is too much
for me. I max out at raised and sunken beds.

 

A repurposed sandbox, fine: beans’ greedy ringlets,
an argyle trellis; tomatoes drooping outside
steel gyres; a frame of marigolds to put off deer.
Blind alleys under lawns, yes, and fraud roses
and knee prints, balloons in every stage of dilation.

 

The woman thinning the zucchini; the child
plowing a stripped crayon, lengthwise, over a page
his father holds square across a gently canted
stone: I cannot tell you their befores or their afters.
Those plots are beyond me. I can only write Look.

 

Used Benison

Tonight I am borrowing a septuagenarian’s life,
his lap full of husks and silk, his friend running
streetlights; they are rushing ears of sweetcorn

 

to boiling water, they are racing sugar’s corrosion
into starch. I am borrowing everything. The chrysalis
a boy set on his dresser for its shape alone. The brief

 

pet it bred. I am trying on a whole record of wonder:
the child’s, an inning into summer; the groom’s,
his paisley a distraction to the Baptists; the old

     fellow’s—

 

if this is life who could earn their keep—when he

     throws
up his hands. There is a joy that helpless. I borrow it.
I too have been loved more than makes sense.

Share

POEM WHEN REMINDED ABOUT GRACE

Cynthia Atkins

 

And the girls that held my hair back
at the water fountain or the toilet.
Girls prettier than me, better teeth.
And the pimpled teen that held out
an umbrella at the bus stop,
as rain pelted the city sidewalks.
I am reminded about grace—
Human beings touching, making contact.
Unctuous hugs by friends in sweaters
over coffee on a snowy day.
The wet shoes of our beings.
A warmth that lights the way.
(Because we’re all going to die.)
This morning, a hummingbird flew
so close to my shoulder, I felt
the motor of her tiny wings—
like a baby’s milky breath.
Or that stranger that bought
me coffee on a day made from hell—
The lady that just worked a nightshift,
offered me her seat on the bus, because I was
eight months pregnant. This afternoon, I ate
a sandwich made by my lover’s.
familiar hands. My tender war chest—
a penned note with a jagged hand-drawn heart.

Share

The Art of Murder

Juliana Gray

 

It’s gently raining in Savannah, a scrim of yellow pollen floating on puddles in the historic downtown, where everyone I meet is talking about the trial. No one needs to specify what trial; only an hour away in Walterboro, South Carolina, Alex Murdaugh has just been convicted of the 2021 murders of his wife Maggie and son Paul. Murdaugh claimed to have discovered their bodies, dead from multiple gunshots, after coming home from a visit to his ailing mother. However, during the trial, the prosecution obliterated his alibi by playing a cell phone video, taken by Murdaugh’s son just minutes before his death, in which his father’s voice was clearly audible. The story made national news, but here, it must have felt local.

 

I’m here to teach a poetry workshop on a nearby barrier island, but before I catch my boat, there’s a museum I want to see. I walk past gift shops selling replicas of the bird girl statue featured on the cover of Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil, past a group of college students gleefully discussing Murdaugh’s two life sentences. I pause near a teenage couple on a bench. The girl is describing the very museum I’m about to visit to the disinterested boy; her tone is wheedling, like a child begging for ice cream. “They have, like, bodies and horror movie shit,” she says, “and paintings and pictures and letters and stuff from serial killers. But it’s, like, real.”

 

 

When investigators and psychologists analyze serial murderers, one of the traits they often identify is narcissism. According to a study published by the FBI after a 2005 Serial Murder Symposium, “certain traits common to some serial murderers includ[e] sensation seeking, a lack of remorse or guilt, impulsivity, the need for control, and predatory behavior. These traits and behaviors are consistent with the psychopathic personality disorder.” Psychopathic personalities may demonstrate “glibness, superficial charm, a grandiose sense of self-worth, pathological lying, and the manipulation of others.”

 

In other words, a serial killer is often an attention-seeking asshole who believes he’s the smartest person in the room. Think of Jack the Ripper sending taunting letters to Victorian London newspapers, or of Ted Bundy’s grandstanding at his 1979 trial, one of the first to be nationally televised. Think of Alex Murdaugh’s insistence on testifying in his own defense in March 2023. Flushed and agitated, Murdaugh said he had lied about not being present at the dog kennels where the murders took place because his prescription drug addiction had made him paranoid. He repeatedly used the sentimental pet names “Mags” and “Paul Paul” when referring to his wife and son, insisting he did not kill them. The jury didn’t buy it; in fact, they seemed to find him even more repellent after his testimony. One legal analyst said, “I think he thought he could outsmart the jurors.”

 

The FBI’s serial murder study firmly debunks the myth that these killers are charismatic masterminds like Hannibal Lecter. The report says, “the media has created a number of fictional serial killer ‘geniuses’, [sic] who outsmart law enforcement at every turn. Like other populations, however, serial killers range in intelligence from borderline to above average levels.” Ted Bundy transferred colleges, changed majors, and even dropped out altogether before earning his BA in psychology seven years after graduating high school; his LSAT scores were below average, and though he was admitted to law school, he never completed that degree. Jeffrey Dahmer flunked out of The Ohio State University. John Wayne Gacy never finished high school.

 

Yet one particular quirk–a trait, a tendency, perhaps a talent–runs through the histories of many serial killers. Some of them, either while committing their crimes or during their incarcerations, also create art. Some write poetry or stories, but more often they draw or paint. And their art is on display in Savannah, Georgia.

 

 

The Graveface Museum is located in a former cotton warehouse on Factors Walk, behind the touristy strip on River Street. An offshoot of Graveface Records & Curiosities, located a few miles away on the other side of Forsyth Park, the museum opened in February 2020 and was forced to close its doors just three weeks later. However, it survived the pandemic thanks to TikTok and other social media. True crime enthusiasts and fans of the macabre from across the country have journeyed to Savannah specifically to see the bizarre and often gruesome items the museum’s owner, Ryan Graveface, has collected over several decades.

 

I shake the rain off my umbrella and enter past a headless plastic skeleton hanging on the door. A sign around its neck reads, “I ASSURE YOU, WE’RE OPEN.” Inside, the air is musty; I have an urge to slip on the KN95 mask I carry in my purse. The gift shop shelves are crowded with possum tails, taxidermied squirrels, T-shirts, records, stickers, and enamel pins, many of them serial killer-themed. The vibe is both self-serious and campy. I buy a twenty-dollar ticket, and after a few minutes a teenage tour guide invites me and the few others who are waiting to “enter through the Mouth of Satan,” a gigantic papier-mâché devil’s face constructed around the doorway. I snicker, but the guide maintains his deadpan as we follow him through the curtain.

 

 

A shrunken head. A grimacing “Fiji mermaid,” a taxidermied monkey’s head and torso attached to a fish’s tail. Two-headed animals and other circus “freaks.” Framed letters from “Son of Sam” serial killer David Berkowitz. The windowless walls are covered with photos, postcards, and other documents, some framed or laminated, most simply taped to the walls and slightly crooked. I pass through most of these exhibits quickly, taking care not to touch anything. Past the incongruous pinball room, where a few people punch idly at the vintage machines, is a closed door with a sign proclaiming the Ed Gein Experience, but I decide to save that for later. Upstairs is where I want and dread to go. Upstairs are the true crime rooms.

 

 

Ted Bundy wanted to die. According to an article in The Washington Post, “In December 1977, when Bundy was in a Colorado jail awaiting trial for the murder of a nurse, he asked a lawyer which state would most likely execute a killer. Florida, came the reply.” Days later, Bundy escaped from his cell and headed for the Sunshine State. He had already been convicted of kidnapping in Utah and was facing murder charges in several states. His mask had slipped, the monster underneath was exposed, and he had nothing left to lose. A week after he arrived in Tallahassee, he bludgeoned his way through a Florida State University sorority house, killing two women, Margaret Bowman and Lisa Levy, and horribly injuring three others. During his flight from the scene, he broke into an apartment a few blocks away and severely beat another young woman, who survived. Three weeks later, in Lake City, he murdered twelve-year-old Kimberly Leach.

 

These were not the stealthy abductions and murders Bundy had committed in the Pacific Northwest, but frenzied slayings guaranteed to end not only in Bundy’s arrest and conviction, but in his sentence to the electric chair. According to this version of his story–and there is a lot of lore about this charismatic killer–Bundy knew he was going to prison and chose certain execution over the possibility of life without parole.

 

Why? Well, in addition to being generally unpleasant and dangerous, prison is boring. It’s designed to be, as its inmates have been deemed unfit for society and sentenced to atone for their crimes. Yet as the focus of imprisonment shifted from punishment to rehabilitation in the 1960s and social justice advocates turned their attention toward the incarcerated, more educational and art therapy programs were introduced. Some programs offer vocational training in fields like woodworking or jewelry making; others provide outlets for creative expression such as painting, sculpture, and poetry.

 

On Florida State Prison’s death row, Bundy did not have access to art classes. There’s no indication that he had any interest in paints, pencils, or poems. But many men like him did.

 

 

The John Wayne Gacy art gallery is an assault of color. Yellow walls groan with canvases, mostly  oils, in bright primary colors. Gacy’s most frequent subject was, unsurprisingly, himself, or at least a version of himself. While living in Chicago in the 1970s, Gacy managed a contracting company; he also sometimes donned a clown costume and greasepaint to perform as Pogo the Clown at charity events, political fundraisers, children’s parties, and hospitals. Meanwhile, he murdered over thirty men and boys, concealing many of their bodies in a crawlspace under his house.

 

At the Graveface Museum, portrait after portrait of Gacy-as-Pogo looms from the walls. Swipes of garish blue outline the clown’s eyes; a lurid red crescent like a slice of watermelon embellishes his mouth. Small details in the background or the pompoms on his jaunty hat vary, but the pose repeats in frame after frame: in one hand, Pogo holds a bunch of balloons. His other hand is raised, the fingers slightly curled, somewhere between a wave and a benediction.

 

 

The Pogo self-portraits are a Gacy cliché, but I’m surprised at some of his other subjects: a red rose, several skulls, songbirds, a portrait of Charles Manson, a portrait of Elvis Presley. Between his 1978 arrest and his 1994 execution, Gacy churned out–and sold–thousands of paintings. People would commission portraits of themselves or loved ones, mailing photographs to the killer; Gacy charged around a hundred dollars per canvas.

 

Another frequent subject is the Seven Dwarves from Disney’s Snow White. Gacy painted them in different landscapes, marching to or from the mines, skating on a frozen lake, gathered around a bonfire. A museum employee tells me that Gacy painted dozens of dwarf scenes, but never Snow White herself. He was fixated, it seems, on the innocent-seeming little men, going about their daily business, all the while concealing a precious secret inside their cottage.

 

The museum website states that they own “everything that was in [Gacy’s] cell at the time of his execution, all of his company documents, travel records, receipts, 237 paintings, 1200+ letters, over 60 hrs of unheard audio tapes . . . and much more.” Only a fraction of these artifacts is on display, but Gacy dominates the true crime rooms, covering several walls.

 

 

But there are more walls, with art by more killers. Arthur Shawcross, the so-called Genesee River Killer, confessed in 1990 to strangling eleven women. Here is his drawing of a wolf. Henry Lee Lucas, the so-called Confession Killer whose claims of over 600 murders have been largely discredited, was nonetheless convicted of killing his mother and two others. Here is his sentimental painting of a floppy-eared puppy next to a pot of flowers. Lucas’s friend and sometime partner Ottis Toole was convicted of six murders. Here are his childlike drawings of horned, red-eyed demons. Here are drawings by Richard Ramirez, the so-called Night Stalker. Here are portraits by Samuel Little, believed to be the most prolific serial killer in the United States. And more.

 

 

The stuffiness of the windowless room is suddenly oppressive; I’m breathing dust comprised of pollen, soil, bacteria, hair and dead skin cells. I have to take notes and pictures. I have to get out.

 

 

 

Months later, after I returned home, Ryan Graveface and I exchanged a few emails, but after I sent him a list of questions, he stopped responding. You can find other interviews with him online. You can read about his interest in serial killers and the macabre, how he changed his name after it came to him in a dream.

 

My emails did not mention that Ryan Graveface and I had met before. When I was in Savannah in 2016, my host took me to Graveface Records and introduced us; Graveface was polite but preoccupied, so I walked around the store. The museum would not open for another four years, and racks of vinyl shared space with animal skulls and taxidermy. Inside a glass case, one of John Wayne Gacy’s Pogo self-portraits saluted with its balloons.

 

I’d heard a rumor on a true crime podcast that after Gacy realized how much money he could make by selling his paintings, he recruited his fellow inmates to form a kind of artistic assembly line. One man would fill in the blue around Pogo’s eyes, another the red of his mouth, and so on until Gacy added his signature. If true, this practice would explain the repetitive paint-by-numbers quality of Gacy’s work. But when I mentioned this rumor to Graveface, he bristled. “I have a certificate of authenticity!” he snapped, pointing to a piece of paper inside the glass case. I didn’t push it, and my host and I soon left for the bakery next door.

 

The Graveface Museum website offers free certificates of authenticity “to anyone who is attempting to purchase a Gacy painting from a random internet seller.” The site says that “the market is FLOODED with fakes,” but with Graveface’s access to Gacy’s logbooks, they can verify the serial numbers of any paintings.

 

That is, they can verify that a painting was sold by Gacy. But did his hand hold the brush that created it? If he lied for years about his crimes, about the essence of who he was, why wouldn’t he lie about a canvas? I wonder whether a man who lived this kind of double life, both pillar of the community and remorseless killer, can be considered in any way “authentic.”

 

 

It goes without saying—doesn’t it?—that serial killer art is objectively terrible. There’s no depth of composition or color, no complexity or nuance of expression. There’s only the self, or whatever version of the self the artist has decided to project. Some, like Ottis Toole and the so-called Gainesville Ripper Danny Rolling, go for shock, sketching scenes of torture or demons. Their drawings look like something a teenage Black Sabbath fan might have doodled in his spiral notebook. Others, like Gacy and Henry Lee Lucas, go for irony, depicting bright, innocent clowns and animals and cartoons. “Look,” they seem to be saying, “I have a sensitive side, just like you.”

 

 

 

The allure of the artwork isn’t the art itself, but the monster who created it. Think of the portraits by George W. Bush and the attention they received when an email hacker posted several images in 2013. Art critics and comedians alike took potshots at Bush’s bathtub self-portrait, but the former president seems to have been encouraged by the attention; since then, he has published two books of his oil portraits. While some reviews were positive, others called his paintings “kitschy” and “inelegant.” My favorite review, published in The Ithacan, described his book Out of Many, One: Portraits of America’s Immigrants as “awful art made by an even more awful person.” Nevertheless, the book was a #1 New York Times bestseller.

 

Perhaps a more apt comparison is to elephants, gorillas, dogs, and other animals taught to paint. They’ve learned to imitate their human trainers, taking up brushes in hand or mouth and dabbing color onto canvas as they’ve seen people do. Animals who do this receive praise, perhaps a favorite food. Their paintings sell for thousands of dollars.

 

Many states have passed laws preventing convicted criminals from profiting from their crimes; some have determined that profits from book and movie rights should go to victims and their families. The technical term for such legislation is a “notoriety-for-profit law,” but the more familiar term is a “Son of Sam law.” Today these laws are mostly used to prevent the online sale of criminals’ artwork, letters, and personal items. The term for these items, coined in the early 2000s by then-director of the Houston Police Department’s Crime Victims Office Andy Kahan, is “murderabilia.”

 

For thirty-five years, the New York State Department of Corrections hosted an annual art show in Albany. A corrections spokesperson said the “Corrections on Canvas” show was “designed to allow inmates to show that during incarceration, they were finding positive ways to use their time in a manner that was felt contributed to rehabilitation.” Inmates were allowed to keep half of the proceeds from the sale of their art, while the other half was donated to the state Crime Victims Board. However, after a portrait of Princess Diana, created by serial killer Arthur Shawcross, sold for $500 in 2002, there was an uproar. Relatives of Shawcross’s victims–eleven women whom he raped, strangled, and mutilated–protested vehemently, and the art show was discontinued. The executive director of the Correctional Association of New York called the ban of inmate art sales a “blow to the rehabilitative process, at least for those inmates who produce attractive art.”

 

 

A few hours after leaving the Graveface Museum, I board a boat that ferries me to an unspoiled barrier island, where I spend days taking long walks, talking about poetry, and hand-feeding carrots and apples to semi-tame donkeys. For two months, I avoid looking at the ghoulish pictures on my phone.

 

 

But I can’t help thinking about them and wondering why I find them so troubling. I’ve been a consumer of true crime all my life, and I spend hours each week watching documentaries and listening to podcasts about violent acts. The first thing I do after checking into any hotel room is to turn the TV to Forensic Files. The soothing repetition of its decades-old reruns instantly makes a strange place feel familiar. So why am I unsettled by the art made by convicted killers?

 

The intimacy, for one thing. Seeing a brush or pencil stroke calls too vividly to mind the hand that created it, as well as other things that hand has done. Here is a canvas or a sheet of paper held by a person who not only enacted some of the worst horrors one human can inflict on another, but who also seems to have taken pleasure in those horrors. For some visitors to the museum, that intimacy must be thrilling. For me, it’s repulsive.

 

True crime culture is having a moment of self-reckoning, trying to correct its history of glamorizing violence, especially the violence of serial killers. There’s an increasing focus on victims, and a self-expiating repetition of the mantra that victims and survivors are real people. Very little of that self-awareness is included in the Graveface displays; most of the artworks are accompanied by a short biography of the killers who created them, but they rarely mention victims. When victims are named, their names are buried in graphic descriptions of what they suffered.

 

Nevertheless, the market for serial killer art and other murderabilia remains robust, with websites like Serial Killers Ink and Murderauction.com offering artwork, letters, and other personal items belonging to or associated with convicted murderers. A few weeks after Alex Murdaugh’s conviction for murdering his wife and son, items belonging to his family were sold at auction. There doesn’t seem to have been anything qualifying as “art” in the sale–the closest thing was a set of pillows monogrammed with Maggie Murdaugh’s initials–but buyers bid hundreds of dollars for everyday items like Yeti cups and beer koozies. A mounted rack of deer antlers reportedly sold for $10,000.

 

Alex Murdaugh is serving two consecutive life sentences without the possibility of parole at the McCormick Correctional Institution in South Carolina. Among the mandatory rehabilitative classes at the prison are anger management, victim impact, creative writing, and art.

Share

Russian Roulette

Anne Panning

 

“Angelina Jolie’s Disclosure of Preventive Mastectomy Highlights Dilemma”

                                                —The New York Times, May 14, 2013

 

________________________________________________________________________

I. Catapult

Plastic Surgeon #1, sidetracked, is convinced I have scoliosis.  “No,” I repeat. “I do not have scoliosis.” Still, I stand in my underwear and hang my arms over my head like I’m diving. He fingers my spine silently. Humpity, humpity, hump.  “Hmm,” he says, unconvinced.  It turns out I have “severe chest wall asymmetry.” Basically, I’m uneven, a tippy table, which will make breast reconstruction complicated.

 

The plastic surgeon’s name is Stephen. He’s got a soft, dewy face, dark hair, black glasses, and when I ask questions, he suddenly whips back on his stool as if ready to catapult himself into space. Dr. Stephen crosses his hands over his white coat. He’s busy and rich and has many women to see. He doesn’t like my fifteen-point list of questions. “We’ll take good care of you,” he says. He signals we’re done by stuffing his pen into his lab coat pocket. I bet myself one million dollars he’s been trained to say that at the end of every consult.

 

It’s the nurse, Danielle, who lays out the facts in his wake: My BRCA (read: breast cancer) genetic mutation predisposes me to a 90% chance of the most vicious, untreatable breast cancer. Plus, holy hell: a 65% chance of ovarian cancer, the “silent” killer. The choices: 1) Have surgery to remove all at-risk body parts or 2) don’t. I want “don’t” but can’t choose “don’t.” How can I? I have two children. A beautiful husband. All the students I have yet to teach and love. There’s still Japan to visit. Indonesia. My children’s weddings. Their grandchildren! To do nothing is Russian Roulette. To do nothing is to wide-eye my way through every sleepless night waiting for my mutant DNA to blastoma the hell out of my breasts.

 

Danielle wears leather joggers and high heels. Her holiday manicure features tiny gold Christmas trees sparkling at the tips. I like her and imagine if I go with Dr. Stephen, I’ll really be going with Danielle—health care being what it is.

 

 II. Goldilocks

Plastic Surgeon #2 says I’m lucky. “You have the perfect ‘Goldilocks’ situation for direct-mastectomy-to-implant!” She dutifully lists the reason aloud:

1) my breasts have just the right droop (ptosis)

2) I “want” to go smaller, not larger

3) I’m not overweight

4) I don’t “want” to keep my nipples

5) I do not have and have not had cancer

 

Apparently, I meet all items on the Goldilocks checklist for a perfect and immediate reconstruction. But where is my perfect little bowl of porridge? The tiny chair that’s just right—until I break it? Because I’m broken. Am I broken? What does a broken little stick of DNA look like?

 

The doctor’s name is Elena, and she tries to bring me in closer by hushing her voice. “I understand why you’re doing this,” she says. “I have a two-year-old.” Which I translate to mean: she is young, still green, which makes me wonder, then worry: How many breast reconstructions does she even have under her belt? I ask; I have to. “One and a half,” she says, smirking at the half. My friends have always teased me about my horrible poker face. Dr. Elena must see it in my eyes: my fear, my “oh hell no!” She adjusts her white coat with a quick glance at the clock. “Why don’t you look at some of these photos,” she says. She is immensely professional and kind. She angles the monitor so I can see.

 

I stare at headless women’s photographs on the website. Dr. Elena clicks to show me “Before” and “After” breasts. I note the women’s whiteout swimsuit lines, their freckly constellations, the taut cords of their necks: chins up, eyes unseen. The “Before” breasts fascinate with their oddities and quirks: the gigantic bumpy nipples like big melted cookies; the soft, deep flop of boobs hanging heavy to the belly button; the tiny, hard nipples that really do look like pink pencil erasers. All the women wear the same white satin triangle underpants: the plastic surgery uniform of the brave. The “After” breasts remind me of Coraline’s crisscross button eyes. They look like blank, soft doll faces, nipples gone, pale skin hatched with red scars. “So which of these are your patients?” I ask. She scrolls and clicks back a few. “This one,” she says. I nod. It looks like every other horror show of loss.

 

I don’t ask about the other half of the one-and-a-half procedures she’s done.

 

III. Wink

Plastic Surgeon #3 is the overeager guy in high school, the three-sport athlete, the smart, generically handsome, deeply insecure charmer all grown up. He’s got a gray cowlick and an aggressive overbite some might find attractive. His name is Howard, and something about his beady eyes and frantic movements feels ferret-like. “You don’t mind if I have a resident in here with me, do you? This is Luke.” Hasn’t that ship already sailed? I mean, here he is. “That’s fine,” I say, even though it’s the only appointment my husband is unable to attend. Never mind: I’ve grown used to standing topless in front of blue walls for photographs while men take pictures and talk about my breasts.

 

Luke is a curly-haired surfer type. He’s the young scribe and the apprentice and is working hard to make me comfortable. “Oh, yeah, totally,” he says in answer to my questions. “Yeah, yeah. I hear ya, man. It’s all good.” They measure the distance from sternum notch to nipple; they lift each breast as if feeling for the perfect weight and density of a ripe grapefruit. Dr. Howard dictates, and Luke writes: “nipples everted, shoulder grooving mild, ptosis level two for each breast.”

 

“Hey, I know what ptosis means,” I say. “It means my breasts are really floppy and droopy.” I laugh, shrug my shoulders like, “Eh, what’re you gonna do?” This stops both of them in their tracks—literally. Something has shifted. Dr. Howard fumbles with his tie. “I didn’t say that,” he says. Luke offers bro backup. “Oh, no, man. That’s not what he was saying at all.” Now it makes sense how remarkably quick and easy it was to secure  an appointment with Dr. Howard, even though he’s Chief of Breast Reconstructive Surgery at Best Hospital in the World. He’s a hot commodity on the speaking circuit for his expertise on microvascular surgery, yet I got in to see him immediately. I think I might understand: He’s a bit of a letch. Or is condescending. Cruel. Perhaps he has not dealt with women appropriately in the past. Perhaps that’s why Luke is here at the get-go.

 

“Can you send me the link to the photo gallery of your past patients?” I ask. Luke gives me a thumbs-up. Dr. Howard swivels back to his computer. “Oh, we don’t really do photo galleries like that.”

 

“Really.” I dare him to dismiss my curt, angry tone. “And why’s that?”

 

“Photos aren’t really that helpful,” he says. He crosses his arms, and I catch him glancing at the clock. Luke’s cell goes off; honest to god, it’s Bruno Mars’s “Uptown Funk.” He doesn’t apologize but dashes out the door without a word. It’s now me against Dr. Howard.

 

“Trust me, your breasts will be stunning.”

 

“Define stunning,” I say.

 

“Ha,” he says. “You got me there.” He looks longingly at the door for his wingman. Anyone, anything, to get him out of this room with this terrible woman who takes things way too seriously.

 

“Are we done?” I ask.

 

He stands, smoothing his tie. “Just let me know what you decide.”

 

He winks at me on his way out.

Share

Ontkommer

Kim Magowan

 

My husband is Catholic and more devoted than I like, though it didn’t stop Matt from marrying me. In September, our ten-year-old son Ethan will be confirmed—a strange verb. As babies, both our kids were baptized, but Matt blamed it on my mother-in-law. Or rather, Matt allowed me to assume that my mother-in-law was the instigator, and that I should be a good sport and capitulate. That my agreeing to the christenings was akin to eating Rose’s disgusting sweet potatoes topped with mini-marshmallows on Thanksgiving.

 

But Rose died two years ago, so Matt no longer has her to hide behind. “Why do we need to do this?” I ask, when Matt schedules Ethan’s confirmation. I suspect the current culprit is Matt’s sister. I like her considerably less than my mother-in-law and consequently feel more motivation to resist.

 

Only then does Matt say, soberly, “I don’t want Ethan or Sallie to go to hell.”

 

“Don’t you care if I go to hell?” I want to ask. But I don’t. What’s Matt supposed to say?

 

Instead I go to Holy Waters, our neighborhood bar. My favorite bartender, Theo, says, “Your usual?” Theo makes me one of their off-menu cocktails, an After the Gold Rush. They’re delicious; they sneak up on you.

 

Over drinks, I joke with my friends who live down the street about being left out of Team Heaven. My friend Miranda reminds us of that Seinfeld episode, where Elaine gets pissed off when she discovers her boyfriend Puddy is born-again, not because his Christianity is off-putting, but because he doesn’t try to convert her. Puddy accepts her eternal damnation with equanimity. To Elaine, this is proof that he doesn’t love her.

 

I laugh, uneasily.

 

My friend David says, “It’s interesting for a Catholic to get all wackadoodle about these rituals. Usually it’s us Jews, insisting shiksa girlfriends convert.”

 

Ethan and Sallie are automatically Jewish, because I am. Unlike David and Miranda, who celebrate Shabbat, I am only Jewish in the most technical of senses, because my mother was. I never go to synagogue, I didn’t have a Bat Mitzvah. One thing about being Jewish is that no opt-in is required. I like the fact that my religion is the hereditary one, like my dominant brown eyes.

 

For Christmas, my sister-in-law gave Ethan a book about the saints. Often while I cook dinner, Ethan reads me stories about the martyrs. I repeat these to Miranda and David now, as we down second drinks. They are truly gruesome, I tell them, disturbing material for a ten-year-old to be consuming.

 

I tell them that Saint Sebastian, contrary to what they might think, didn’t die because he was shot with arrows. He was indeed shot with arrows and left for dead, but then some woman discovered him bleeding and unconscious, and she nursed him back to health. Once he’d recuperated, Sebastian zoomed straight back to the same emperor who’d condemned him. This time, Diocletian ordered Sebastian clubbed to death; this time, the execution stuck.

 

Theo the bartender is cutting limes in wedges, listening. “How weird, that Sebastian’s always painted stabbed with arrows,” Theo says. “Why not being beaten with clubs?”

 

We decide arrows are better optics, the injuries more paintable.

 

It’s also, of course, weird that as soon as his wounds were healed, Sebastian would dash right back to the court of the emperor who commanded the original arrow firing squad. But one thing I’ve learned about the Christian martyrs, via my son, is that such behavior is far from exceptional. Many saints energetically pursued their martyrdom. If the mode of execution seemed too benign, they sometimes campaigned for additional suffering or indignities. Peter insisted on being crucified upside down.

 

“Allegedly to make up for denying Christ three times,” I tell David, Miranda, and Theo. “But still: doesn’t it seem show-offy, being so masochistic? Isn’t that pretty much what gives ‘martyr’ a bad name?”

 

Renaissance artists painted saints holding the weapons that killed them, like baskets of stones or Catherine’s wheel or the gridiron upon which Lawrence was burned alive. Or saints brandished grisly nods to how they died. In Michaelangelo’s The Last Judgement, Bartholomew, flayed to death, holds a knife in his right hand and his own loose skin in his left, pinched between his fingers like a scrunched-up towel.

 

Miranda, who minored in art history in college, tells us that Bartholomew is a self-portrait. “Apparently, Michaelangelo had ‘feelings’ about being forced to complete The Last Judgement,” she says.

 

That makes us laugh—we’re maybe a little drunk.

 

I tell them flayed Bartholomew is the patron saint of tanners. Does this mean Catholics have a sense of humor?

 

“Supposedly Saint Lawrence, the one who was grilled to death and lugs his gridiron around in paintings, said ‘I’m cooked on that side. Turn me over,’” I say.

 

David says, “Well, that pretty much defines gallows humor.”

 

“That’s what you’d call humorose,” says Miranda, running “humor” and “morose” together. I groan, and David impersonates a rim shot.

 

Then I describe my favorite martyr: Wilgefortis, a young Portuguese noblewoman, promised in marriage to a Moorish king. Committed to maintaining her virginity, Wilgefortis prayed to be made repulsive. Her prayers were answered when she sprouted a full beard. That cracks us up, though the ending of Wilgefortis’s story is sobering: her pissed-off father, angry at having an ambitious match thwarted, ordered her crucified.

 

Quite a few of the martyrs, I tell them, were killed by the command, or even the hand, of their own fathers.

 

David Googles Wilgefortis and reads to us from his phone. Apparently, Wilgefortis has many names, some surprising. David says, “Her Latin-derived name, ‘courageous virgin,’ seems predictable. But In Dutch, she’s called ‘Ontkommer,’ which means ‘One Who Avoids Something.’”

 

That makes us laugh again. But now I’m staring into the depths of my brown drink, its ice cubes half-dissolved, reflecting on all the ways that I relate.

Share

To Bury a Secret: A Conversation with Brian Alessandro

Julian’s Debut

Brian Alessandro

Rebel Satori Press

$21.95

Publication Date: March, 2025

 

Leona Strong: How did your education in clinical psychology influence the creation of your character Julian in Julian’s Debut?

 

Brian Alessandro: I pursued an MA in clinical psychology rather than an MFA in creative writing because I wanted to better understand the interiority of people. I thought it would give me a different vantage point as a writer, and I believe it did. When writing a story, I find that I start with a theme and subtext and allow the plot or characters to develop from there. It was certainly the case in my creation of Julian Sorrento, who is partially based on me. I began with Julian’s passive-aggressive personality, his accommodating nature, his martyr complex, and my intention is to always analyze and dissect the behavior and personality. My interests mainly reside in perception and the many ways we react to trauma, in all its forms.

 

Leona Strong: This book combines three distinct elements: the primary prose, excerpts from The New Yorker essay that launches Julian’s journey, “The Mighty Meekness,” and the cable series script, The Touring Barbarism!, that Julian writes throughout the book. I’m curious to know how this came about. Did you craft these pieces chronologically as you wrote the book, or did you write each thread separately, then weave them together?

 

Brian Alessandro: “My Mighty Meekness” was based on a true short memoir I wrote about my family, friends, and ex-boyfriends, which was published in the online journal, Exquisite Pandemic, in 2020. I wrote the fictionalized version of that, Julian’s essay published in The New Yorker, using the same title, and the novel simultaneously. I wrote the screenplay, The Touring Barbarism, separately. I love books that combine styles of writing, ergodic, or more specifically, multimodal literature. I wanted to do something like that here, and since I am a journalist and screenwriter as well as a fiction writer, it was fun to mix formats.

 

Leona Strong: As a writer who has penned screenplays, plays, and fiction, in addition to journalism, was creating a book that combined all of these forms the realization of a dream? Do you prefer one genre of writing over another?

 

Brian Alessandro: It was a joy to combine these different forms and see how they complement each other. Fiction writing is my favorite, for sure, though they all offer different rewards.

 

Leona Strong: How closely do you identify with Julian, the main character and narrator?

 

Brian Alessandro: For better or worse, I very closely identify with Julian. He isn’t meant to be heroic or sympathetic, or even likable. I don’t prioritize likability when I write characters, but I do need for them to be honest and interesting. I think Julian is interesting, if not always honest. I hope that I am not as meek as him, nor as spiteful or deluded.

 

Leona Strong: I read your Instagram posts from November 2024 in which you say that many of the people you have fictionalized in Julian’s Debut “are family members, writers, filmmakers, and acquaintances that have in some way left an impression.” Given the book’s storyline, I can’t help but wonder if you think people, particularly your family members, might recognize themselves? If so, as with Julian, do you worry about the consequences of this?

 

Brian Alessandro: I am both worried and excited to see who recognizes themselves and how they will react. Not everything in the story is true, but there are kernels of truth even in the most outrageous fictionalized behaviors and events. Then again, my good friend Edmund White once said if you want to bury a secret, publish it.

 

Leona Strong: On page 30, Julian says, “Living inside someone’s head and sharing their experience with readers was a kind of intimacy that compelled me to write in the first place.” Would you speak to this and if the same holds true for you as a writer?

 

Brian Alessandro: It does! Writers and readers are in conversation with each other. Literature allows for greater intimacy than most other art forms because the entirety of the writer’s perception and soul is being conveyed through voice to the reader, who is tasked with listening and interpreting. It’s as though the reader absorbs the transcription of the writer’s mind.

 

Leona Strong: Meekness is a common theme within Julian’s Debut. What does meekness mean to you, and do you feel Julian overcomes his meekness by the end of the book?

 

Brian Alessandro: When I wrote the real essay, “My Mighty Meekness,” in 2020, I intended to also investigate meekness journalistically as a virtue, as a form of strength. I am working on my dissertation for my doctorate in psychoanalysis now, and the focus is on the interplay between masochism, martyr complexes, trauma, and resilience with plasticity and morality as connective tissue. I believe and hope to prove with my doctoral work that truly the “meek will inherit the earth.” There is a benevolent, constructive, transformative, and even Buddhist energy endemic in passivity.

 

Leona Strong: Many of Julian’s relatives accuse him of writing the initial essay and subsequent screenplay and book as ways of getting “up there.” You hit this very hard. Julian seems to eschew this characterization, but also admits that he would “sell out his mother if it meant a big TV or movie deal.” Do you read this as character change, or is this something he’s always wanted but just wouldn’t admit to?

 

Brian Alessandro: It’s important to keep Julian’s motive ambiguous, even contradictory, and complex. Does he sell out his family for profit or out of spite, or is he truly misremembering events? Memory is highly subjective and fallible. Every time we remember an event, we revise that memory and conflate and combine it with other memories of the event, so that when we recall something that has happened to us in the past, it has already been extensively reinvented.

 

Leona Strong: I wouldn’t call Raul and Julian’s relationship healthy, yet they seem to have an undeniable connection. What are the challenges of writing about relationships?

 

Brian Alessandro: Raul is an amalgamation of two ex-lovers and one ex-friend. I think writing about relationships is a tricky affair. It should be honest, and with that honesty there needs to be something raw and ugly and even embarrassing to capture the full picture. I am grateful for all my relationships, especially the ones that have left me bruised.

 

Leona Strong: Are we reading the book that Julian is writing and ultimately published in the book?

 

Brian Alessandro: That is a fascinating insight, but I will remain coy about it. I want each reader to decide for themselves.

 

Leona Strong: I would love to know if the trouble Mary has in India is based on a real incident. If so, how did you learn of it and what really happened?

 

Brian Alessandro: I spent three months in India in 2008 with friends throughout the country, and they often spoke about Western academics meddling in personal affairs, causing trouble. Mary is the embodiment of the well-intentioned Western researcher upending an ancient culture by prying. She is not based on any actual person I know.

 

Leona Strong: Julian believes that writing is like painting portraits. Do you intend a connection between this and Raul and Julian’s penchant for museums?

 

Brian Alessandro: I do! For Julian, writing is about constructing abstract portraits. It’s not dissimilar to how a painter paints a portrait with oils or watercolors. I even used the self-portrait of Egon Schiele for my cover.

 

Leona Strong: What would you say are the primary themes of Julian’s Debut? Any takeaways you’d like the reader to leave with?

 

Brian Alessandro: I wanted to write a book that explored the ethical complexities of memoir writing and autofiction. What are the moral implications of writing about other people? Also, it is very much about the dangerous nature of memory, how the past continues to shape us, and the division between public and private personas.


Brian Alessandro has written for numerous publications including Interview Magazine, Newsday, Kirkus, The Gay & Lesbian Review, and many others, and is the author of three novels, The Unmentionable Mann, Performer Non Grata, and Julian’s Debut, as well as coauthor of Edmund White’s A Boy’s Own Story: The Graphic Novel and coeditor of Fever Spores: The Queer Reclamation of William S. Burroughs.

Share

Coming Home to Roost

Laura Chow Reeve

 

Share

What Washes Up

Melina Papadopoulos

 

Lake Erie gives us all she can, and we take it—seagull feathers, shards of driftwood, shells that have long shattered and spilled their songs into the deep. She’s young for one that has given herself to so many shores, a glacier’s cathartic shaping and reshaping. Young for a body of water but old enough to carry years of abandon by land, by sky, and by her depths.

 

I walk alongside her with my father. Just yesterday, I went on a date gone right (right in that I got an enthusiastic text back). Today, with the lake’s offerings at our feet, my father warns me against strangers. I tell him I don’t want to give myself to them, I just want to know that I’m worthy of taking.

 

Far down the shore, we spot a fish with no eyes, its quiet organs exposed. That’s a sheepshead, my father says. I nod. I think I’m too old for this, to take his words and hold them tight like weighty stones. I’m thirty. I’m embarrassingly new to love that nobody owes me.

 

But I want to be worthy even of his love, one I was born into. So I listen. I listen to him cough when he has nothing left to say. I watch Lake Erie fall into the sky but return to us, again and again, with new refuse, wave by wave.

Share

CONFESSIONAL

Michael Chang

 

this poem’s abt me. dead serious. loads of them are: no no zone, almanac of useless talents, fine w/o u, california one night stand, 500 horses outside at the valet, white ford bronco, awful ghosts, carnal flower, rasputin, my forever person, working stiff, sad boy public relations, garden state trick, bleu de chanel, white tennis shoes, suede kisses, internet boyfriend, simpatico, student-athlete’s college recruitment guide, leg of lamb, gin & milk, duck duck goose, still life w/ sunglasses at nite . . . it would be easier to list the poems of theirs i’m not in. they’ve been writing abt me for 12 years. i was one of their earliest students, way back when i was 19. totally fell in love w/ them & let them know it, although i was scared, before having to go home to texas & check into rehab. the whole ordeal left me spinning my wheels, afraid even to go to str8 spaces like home depot. found out a few years ago they’d written a number of love poems abt me. called me catullus, something abt my breath, described my bedroom as having the atmosphere of an operating theater. tried my best to contact them, but they wouldn’t say a word to me. performed my favorite exorcism & purchased shoes for dog. didn’t pay for my chipotle. abandoned tourists on the pier, most definitely high. still they kept writing these damn poems, claiming i’m terrified of intimacy.  no, i’m a very intimate guy, have left a lot of bodies behind.  hey, my eyes are up here.  i get it, there’s only so much waiting around u can do.  i want a family, not a fantasy.  very much falling out of love w/ them.  abt damn time.  their stock is sinking fast.

Share

Solace and Hope: A Conversation with Bridget Bell

All That We Ask of You Is to Always Be Happy
Bridget Bell
CavanKerry Press
$18.00 (paperback)
Publication Date: February 4, 2025

 

Sophia Saco: “This Is How You Lose Your Body” was originally published in The Florida Review, and it’s exciting to see the poem again in your collection All That We Ask of You Is to Always Be Happy. Can you speak to the changes in this poem, and perhaps the collection itself, since its original publication?

 

Bridget Bell: When I originally wrote “This Is How You Lose Your Body,” I was super into enjambment; I love the way enjambment can create interesting double meanings on the line break and how it can function to pull a reader through the poem. However, during the editorial process, I worked with Baron Wormser, and he suggested that I organize the stanzas according to the sentences rather than letting the sentences meander so much. I made that edit based on his suggestion, and I think the new lineation creates a more urgent tone. In fact, most of the revisions I made to the full-length manuscript had to do with lineation and stanza changes.

 

Sophia Saco: Postpartum depression is a “common complication” that often goes undiagnosed, as mentioned in the introduction by Dr. Riah Patterson. I was particularly passionate about your collection for its unabashed honesty regarding this seemingly “taboo” subject. Your poems investigate postpartum life from all sides to achieve a nuanced and tangible depiction. What craft challenges did you face in the rendering of these depictions?

 

Bridget Bell: I think the biggest craft challenge was finding the right form for the right content. Postpartum life is so wild, particularly if you are struggling with perinatal mood disorders (PMADs) with symptoms that are all over the map. Some symptoms like intrusive thoughts or ruminations feel very cyclical while other symptoms like disassociation or hopelessness feel very unmoored. It was interesting for me to see how the use of strict form or the total lack of form could connect to the content of each poem. For example, “Sleep Deprivation,” which is one of the least structured poems in the collection, with inconsistent stanza lengths and lines that jump all over the page, tries to mimic how fractured reality can feel when you are sleep deprived. That broken form works for the broken feeling engendered by sleep deprivation. It was a lot of fun to play with that intersection of the emotional content and the form for each poem.

 

Sophia Saco: “I Worry About Women” mentions Sylvia Plath and Charlotte Perkins Gilman. The last lines are rife with satisfaction: “To be able to reach up with my bare palm / and crush an insect’s ancient back.” Would you say that All That We Ask of You Is to Always Be Happy is in conversation with the work of women writers whose anxieties were dismissed? If so, is the collection in conversation with other specific writers?

 

Bridget Bell: The collection is absolutely in conversation with the work of women writers whose anxieties were dismissed, and not just with women writers, but women in general. That same poem you reference starts with the speaker worrying about women “in 1957 Leetonia, Ohio with nothing useful to stop / the babies from coming.” That line was inspired by my grandma who had my dad when she was sixteen and went on to have eight more kids. It hurts me to think about what her postpartum experience must have been like. The poem “Escape” is in conversation with Judy Garland—when I was depressed, I’d quietly sing “Somewhere Over the Rainbow” to my daughter because I was comforted by its sad longing. “Dangerous for Mothers” is in conversation with Connie Voisine’s “Dangerous for Girls,” which if you have not read, you should read. It’s amazing, and it’s also deeply rooted in the idea of dismissing female anxieties.

 

Sophia Saco: I’m interested in your use of strict forms, as in “Sestina In Which The World Fails To Tell You About The Tedium,” as well as your critical look at postpartum complications. I see a connection between the sestina framing the speaker’s monotony (without escape) and the tendency of medical professionals to send patients in circles (without answers). Are there other moments in the collection that function similarly?

 

Bridget Bell: I love how you describe the sestina working in that poem—thank you! It felt like the perfect form to capture an idea that so many people gloss over, which is that infants are boring. With a new baby, your days repeat and your nights repeat and they all start to blur together. I hoped the loops of the sestina would capture that idea. I also use the sonnet a few times throughout the collection, and I think that form functions similarly. For me, the iambic pentameter in sonnets is a bit sing-songy—almost like the nursery rhyme of poetry, so it felt like a natural form to use to sort of poke fun at the idealized “nursery rhyme” version of motherhood. I also felt like the sonnet mimicked that subversive, dark side of nursery rhymes—that ABAB CDCD rhyme scheme can be a bit mocking in its perfection.

 

Sophia Saco: All That We Ask of You Is to Always Be Happy weaves several epigraphs into the fabric of the collection, from section breaks to singular poems. Barbara Ras’s “A Wife Explains Why She Likes Country” and Anne Carson’s “The Glass Essay” are two among many. In the book’s acknowledgements, you also thank the researchers whom you reference, noting their work on maternal mental health. Can you elaborate on your influences for this collection, both obvious and subtle?

 

Bridget Bell: Writing and reading were such huge parts of my recovery process when I was suffering from postpartum depression, and the idea of being in communication with other women—even on a figurative level—through my writing has always appealed to me. When I’m stuck on a poem, I often go back and reread certain poems that I love. Barbara Ras’s “A Wife Explains Why She Likes Country” and Carson’s “The Glass Essay” are two of those poems. So is Connie Voisine’s “Dangerous for Girls.” It’s powerful to imagine that these women’s words helped me to crack open the world of the poems they inspired. I was also super influenced by texts written by maternal mental health experts. Particularly, Karen Kleiman’s book This Isn’t What I Expected: Overcoming Postpartum Depression, which I read early on in my recovery process, was hugely important when I was working on the poems. I also returned over and over again to the website for Postpartum Support International, which includes a section called “Stories of Hope” where women can talk about their personal experience with maternal mental health struggles.

 

Sophia Saco: In “This Is For The Mother (Postpartum Psychosis)” the speaker addresses a “you” at the end: “I am sorry we left you alone. I am sorry we failed you.” I was struck by the poem’s transformation into an apology. I’m reminded of your collection’s title, All That We Ask of You Is to Always Be Happy, and the impossibility of fulfilling such a request. To “always be happy” seems a torture for anyone, let alone for a mother who has just undergone hormonal changes. Could you elaborate on your debut’s title?

 

Bridget Bell: The manuscript was very close to complete when I finally decided on a title. I had other working titles—The Bruise Hurts Less Each Time It Gets Bumped and Normal—but none of them were fully doing what I wanted the title to do. The first was a lyrical way to say that postpartum depression is highly treatable. The second played off the idea that PMADs are quite common. While the treatability and commonality of PMADs is important to the collection, I wanted something with more teeth, something that highlighted the immense pressure new moms feel to “cherish every moment” when in reality the moments to be truly cherished with a newborn are sporadic. I’m also sarcastic by nature, so snark felt right—that also connects back to some of the anger the speakers of the poems feel. When the phrase for the title popped in my brain, I was completely psyched because I knew I’d found the right sentiment.

 

Sophia Saco: All That We Ask of You Is to Always Be Happy toys with language on many levels, and you create your own mother tongue. You do away with age-old expectations and express ideas of motherhood in new ways, both visible and less visible. If you could leave us with a final comment, what do you hope readers will take from this collection?

 

Bridget Bell: My hope is that my poems’ representations of maternal mental health struggles will help other people. In the same way that other women’s stories helped me to recover when I was barely surviving the chaos that is motherhood, I hope this book provides solace and hope.

 


Bridget Bell’s debut poetry collection—All That We Ask of You Is to Always Be Happy (CavanKerry, 2025)—explores maternal mental health. She is the recipient of a North Carolina Arts Council Artist Support Grant and teaches composition and literature at Durham Technical Community College. Additionally, she pours points at Ponysaurus Brewery in Durham, NC and proofreads for Four Way Books, a literary press based in Manhattan. Originally from Toledo, Ohio, she is a graduate of Sarah Lawrence’s MFA program in creative writing. You can find her online at bridgetbellpoetry.com.

Share

Review: The Dissenters by Youssef Rakha

Review of: The Dissenters, by Youssef Rakha; Graywolf; $17.00; 272 pages; February 4, 2025

Review by Alex Ramirez-Amaya

 

“I sought permission to beg forgiveness for my mother; but He did not grant it to me. I sought permission from Him to visit her grave, and He granted it to me.” This epigraph, taken from Book Four of the Sahih Muslim, a collection of hadith, details two appeals: one of forgiveness, and one of remembrance—only the latter of which is granted. This aptly chosen epigraph encapsulates what readers will find in Youssef Rakha’s latest novel. Instead of forgiveness and black-and-white morality, we find the memories of a woman living through a tumultuous time in Egyptian history.

 

The Dissenters is Youssef Rakha’s first novel written in English. For the better part of twenty-five years, Rakha has written fiction and poetry in Arabic. In an essay on “The Slow and Satisfying Discovery of Arabic,” Rakha recounts that, as a young man, Arabic represented two things: “the practical, and the religious,” two things which, in his mind, alienated Arabic from the possibility of literature. On the other hand, his lively and polyglot mother tongue, Egyptian Arabic, was a spoken dialect that proved difficult when it was time to get complicated. It wasn’t until after earning a BA in English at Hull University that Rakha realized both the potential of the Arabic language as a medium for creation and that his world was Arabic-speaking. If he wanted to explore this world, he needed to do it in Arabic, to capture the “intellectual and psychological kicks specific to that world.”

 

Rakha’s publisher aptly describes The Dissenters as “transgressive.” Transgressive works break with the moral and social conventions of their day or historical setting which, in this case, is Egypt in the twentieth century. Such transgressive works seek more than just hedonism and the erosion of archaic social norms; instead, they move us toward a radically new way of seeing and being in the world. Rakha pushes these transgressions further through his use of language. By blending vernacular Arabic with the standard and the religious, Rakha initiates us into a world where change can be enacted through the words we choose to utter. Rakha blurs the lines of language, dialect, life, family, memory, and desire—not only in content but in form and style.

 

The novel is framed as a series of letters written by Nour to his sister discussing the “secret” life of their mother, a woman who went by three names: Amna, Nimo, and Mouna. The opening page contains a jarring admission from Nour, who marvels at his desire for “Mouna, a Mouna that is and is not [his] mother.” In the pages that follow, Nour recounts to his sister, Shimo, their mother’s past, and, along the way, multiple decades of Egyptian history, spanning from the Egyptian Revolution of the 1950s up to the Arab Spring of the 2010s. Nour begins Amna’s (Nimo’s? Mouna’s?) story as a panicked Baccalauréat student on the morning after her wedding night because she cannot present a bloodied white bedsheet as proof of her virginity—though this is through no fault of her own: her husband, a much older man with a case of erectile dysfunction, cannot consummate their marriage. Amna worries about her absence from school and about what may be perceived as her questionable virginity.

 

What follows is a work of art unafraid of peeling back the layers of history to find the often ugly and complicated truth beneath. The novel’s short, nonlinear chapters and interjections read more like prose poetry than anything else. As I made my way through the novel, I could not help but think of Virginia Woolf’s The Waves, another magnificent display of living language reminiscing on the dead. Yet, Rakha’s novel cannot be defined as simply continuing a tradition that began with European modernists. In The Dissenters, Rakha has successfully created a novel that is wholly his own.

 

Mirroring Rakha’s mother tongue, Egyptian Arabic, The Dissenters reflects a similar “polyglotism” in the way Rakha weaves globalization and imperialism past into a meditation on culture, revolution, and memory. One of the protagonists memorizes Jacques Brel’s “Ne me Quitte Pas” to the point that she can play it “in her head.” Others drive Cadillac DeVilles. Polyglotism is evident even at the sentence level: the narration and dialogue are often interjected with Arabic and French phrases—sometimes, there are three languages in one sentence. For the characters of the novel, Arabic, English, and French are not multiple streams of thought; rather, they are a single river of communication and existence. I’m often critical of multilingualism in English literature because it risks caricaturing what life in multiple languages is actually like. In Rakha, I find someone who understands the experience of multilingualism, which is not just a string of code-switching, but fluid movement and thought across many languages.

 

In an interview with afikra, an organization dedicated to a better understanding of the Arab world, Youssef Rakha opined that what makes a particular text different—and therefore important—is the writer’s “capacity to make themself vulnerable.” This goes beyond objectivity and intellectual curiosity; a writer must have felt the “horror, pain, and grief of being human, of being mortal, of being on Earth.” I would only add that being vulnerable and open to our worst experiences also requires courage—a kind of courage that is not easily found. We should consider ourselves grateful, however, that we can find such courage in the works of Youssef Rakha.

Share

At the Whistle, Begin: A Conversation with Jonathan Fink

Don’t Do It—We Love You, My Heart
Jonathan Fink
Dzanc Books
$17.95 (paperback)
Publication Date: January 28, 2025 

 

David James Poissant: Don’t Do It—We Love You, My Heart is your third book of poems. How has your thinking, about life or about art, changed from one book to the next over the years, and how have you grown as a poet? What does this book offer that your earlier books couldn’t?

 

Jonathan Fink: Kurt Vonnegut described an author reviewing their sequence of works as looking back at their path in the snow, and that feels accurate to me (though we don’t get any snow in Florida)—you can see the path that brought you to where you are, though you’re not in the same place. In my current collection, I am in some ways reacting to the compression of my previous collection, which was a collection of sonnets about the Siege of Leningrad. I’m trying to be as inclusive as possible—as welcoming as possible of material and expansiveness—while maintaining and challenging form. There are a lot of one-sentence poems in this collection, and I find that if I can focus my attention grammatically and structurally on something like the expansion of a single sentence, the thematic elements of the poem can rise organically from the material. I am also hopefully continuing to expand my openness to ideas, connections, and the rhythms of voice and music that I can embody most naturally.

 

David James Poissant: One of my absolute favorites here, “Gorbachev’s Birthmark,” a poem that recalls the bad old days of grade school gym and murder ball misogyny, ends with the lines: “‘you have but one life to live. / Be vigilant. Be bold. At the whistle, begin.’” These lines put me in mind of Mary Oliver’s celebrated “The Summer Day.” I’m curious if that poem was on your mind. And whether it was or wasn’t, who are your poetry lodestars? Do you consider your poems in conversation with the work of others?

 

Jonathan Fink: I didn’t have that poem in mind, though I do very much like the courage and stance of Mary Oliver’s poems. Her openness is challenging and encouraging. In my poem specifically, I was thinking back to the decidedly unpoetic experiences of middle-school gym class in 1980’s West Texas juxtaposed against the middle-aged boredom of professional jobs where some days you just wish someone would set up a wrestling mat or obstacle course like the old days and you weren’t just answering emails or pushing paper around all day. I always encourage my students to explore a memory where you can structure two competing points of view, the persona in the past and the persona in the present currently looking back, and the moment where those points of view intersect or are at tension. 

 

I have lots of poets and writers that I find myself returning to for their literary encouragement and example. I frequently return to the contemporary poems of Brigit Pegeen Kelly, Marie Howe, Jane Kenyon, Philip Levine, Natasha Trethewey, Matthew Olzmann, B.H. Fairchild, C. Dale Young, Yusef Komunyakaa (the list goes on and on), as well as writers I think of as “poetic”/lyrical, fiction writers like Michael Ondaatje, Colum McCann…. 

 

David James Poissant: Many of these poems concern place, but not one place. We travel from New York City to West Texas to Spain to Boston, and on. How does place inform your work? Does a place ever dictate the form you choose for a poem?

 

Jonathan Fink: I feel like both place and time are essential to the success of many poems. Not all of the poems in my book are set in time and place (some are more traditional lyric poems), but the benefit of defining time and place in a poem is that you immediately have a past and future in the poem and a “here” and “there” landscape. As I mentioned above, once you have a past and future, you immediately have a past and future persona—you can bring in competing points of view and show change and argument in the persona, not just a singular perspective or momentary viewpoint. Place also gives you rich sensory and experiential details. An apartment in an early 20th century building in Cleveland overlooking the Cuyahoga River is going to have different sensory details from a modern condo in Miami or a flat over a record store in Lawton, Oklahoma. 

 

David James Poissant: Speaking of form, this collection contains poems with numbered stanzas, poems composed of couplets, a prose poem (“When You Least Expect It”), and all manner of poem lengths, from ten lines to over a hundred lines. The variety is stunning. How do you juggle so many shapes so deftly on the page?

 

Jonathan Fink: I feel like much of the process of writing is trying to find the right shape and form for the piece you are creating or the story you are trying to tell. Broadly, I encourage students (and myself) to be open to the expectations of a piece. These expectations aren’t just rhetorical, but are also tonal, imagistic, and structural. They build and generate through the process of writing. Thomas Aquinas said that beauty has three elements: wholeness, harmony, and radiance; and I like how these concepts work together—the wholeness of a piece’s architecture and content/inquiry, the harmony of how everything works together, and the radiance of how the piece moves beyond its singular existence in an expansive and communicative way. So, I hope I can remain open not so much to me dictating a form for a poem but to whatever form might arise to fulfill those elements of expectation and beauty. 

 

David James Poissant: As many of our readers are also writers, maybe you could speak to the mystery of line breaks. What’s your rule of thumb for breaking lines? How do you instruct the beginning poets in your courses at the University of West Florida, where you’ve taught creative writing for many years? Are we all overthinking line breaks, or do they deserve even more reverence?

 

Jonathan Fink: There are lots of different reasons for line breaks—how they look on the page, tone, rhythm, formal meter, among others—but my favorite types of line breaks are where the reader creates an image or scene in their mind based on the line and then there is a slight pause as the image holds over the line break and transforms with the beginning of the next line. William Stafford’s poemTraveling Through the Dark has a great example of this. The first line is “Traveling through the dark I found a deer,” and in the reader’s mind (at least mine) this deer blooms alive in the night and holds there until the beginning of the next line which follows, “dead on the edge of the Wilson River road.” In my mind’s eye the initial image suddenly revises. I am struck by surprise, as I imagine the persona was as well, that the deer is not alive, but dead. It has been alive this whole time across the line break. A lesser poet would have written, “Traveling through the dark I found a dead deer / on the edge of the Wilson River Road”—same information but lacking the surprise and emotional investment of the persona in the line break as Stafford has written it. 

 

David James Poissant: Some of your poems feel deeply personal. Others concern recent or current events and stories from the news. Others are engaged with the history of a place or the examination of a painting. And plenty, like “A Year of Growth,” first published by The Florida Review, defy categorization, allowing subjects to overlap in intriguing ways. Do you begin a poem knowing its subject matter, or do poems ever surprise you in the turns they take as you compose?

 

Jonathan Fink: The poems definitely surprise me, which, as many poets have said, is the essence of writing. I’m not writing blindly, though. I find that there is often a balance between having a triggering idea combined with a general sense of architecture, while also being perpetually open on a line-by-line basis to see how the poem moves and transforms. (I always like the conceptual idea of “yes, and…” used in improv comedy.) In that poem specifically, it’s true that I was building a treehouse, and my youngest daughter colored the end grain of one of the 2x4s to reveal a rainbow. I was surprised by this and liked the image, and I felt like the image had narrative and metaphorical/symbolic potential. I like the Ezra Pound quote that “the natural object is always the adequate symbol,” and I frequently begin poems with a symbol I hope to explore, as in the case here. As the poem developed, though, much of the subtext started to work its way to the surface as an elegy for my mother-in-law who had recently passed away. 

 

Another way of stating this concept of expectation/form/beauty, etc. is to say broadly that when I write, I am thinking about how I am using language to map/explore neural pathways. Not long ago, I heard a good feature on NPRabout how neuroscientists were studying how sensory language traces similar pathways in the brain to the actual action described. So, when we say we “feel” it when someone writes that they accidentally stepped on an exposed nail, piercing their flip-flop into their foot, we actually do “feel” it in the sense that our brains receive that sensory language in a similar neural pathway pattern to the action itself. So, in my writing I try to remind myself that I am not just writing symbols or words, but I am building neural pathway scaffolding. Strange, I know, but I hope conceiving writing this way has helped me to write better poems. 

 

David James Poissant: New Testament stories appear with some frequency here, often in the context of paintings. Did growing up in the church leave an indelible mark on your art, or have the stories taken hold as you’ve grown older?

 

Jonathan Fink: Absolutely and both, and this is something I actually think about a lot. My mother and father were amazing examples to me, as they have always lived their lives in a radical way, taking Christ’s teaching in the Sermon on the Mount literally and instructively. This of course is the hardest thing in the world to actually do. My father, after retiring as an English professor, works daily serving meals to anyone who needs a meal in a small town in Texas. Through their church, they make 400 meals a day. My mother was an elementary school counselor before retiring, and much of her day was spent finding shoes for kids or driving to pick them up when their parents couldn’t be there or contacting social workers, etc. They’ve lived their lives motivated daily by the literal and instructive teachings of Christ. My parents are deeply intellectual and soulful people with deep conviction, and they found and instilled great purpose in our family by trying to follow Christ’s example literally. The fact that religion has been so manipulated and bastardized locally, nationally, and internationally by those in search of political power and social control is a great and real frustration for many people, I believe, who find wisdom and beauty in things like Christ’s teaching in the Sermon on the Mount. So, yes, these things are inescapable in my writing. 

 

I always loved Flannery O’Connor’s statement in A Reasonable Use of the Unreasonable where she says, “Much of my fiction takes its character from a reasonable use of the unreasonable, though the reasonableness of my use of it may not always be apparent. The assumptions that underlie this use of it, however, are those of the central Christian mysteries. These are assumptions to which a large part of the modern audience takes exception. About this I can only say that there are perhaps other ways than my own in which this story [“A Good Man is Hard to Find”] could be read, but none other by which it could have been written. Belief, in my own case anyway, is the engine that makes perception operate.” For me, it’s not necessarily “belief” that is the engine behind perception in my writing, but the framing of a moral understanding of the world and the mysteries of a person’s “soul” informed by the example and guidance of my parents’ lives and convictions. 

 

David James Poissant: As a father of daughters, like you, so many of these poems resonate deeply. If, in the future, your daughters should read your poems, what do you hope they’ll find there?

 

Jonathan Fink: It’s interesting in that they do read them now, in a sense. My daughters are eleven, eight, and five, and I am reading the Harry Potter series to them at night before bed. I read through the books several years ago with my oldest daughter, and now the younger two, who share a room, are interested in reading each night before bed. I read to them from a Kindle, and sometimes the battery is dead, and they’ll ask if I can just read them one of my poems (preferably one that features my daughters as characters) instead. They’ve heard all the ones, I think, about them in the new book, and now they ask for new ones, and it clarifies my limitations that I can’t just pull these things out of thin air. As for what I hope they might see in the future, I hope they see our love for them and the world. 

 

David James Poissant: In closing, what is next for you? Are you already conceiving of your next book-length project?

 

Jonathan Fink: I completed a poetry project for Joshua Tree National Park as an artist in residence last year about the musician Gram Parsons and his life and legacy and the botched cremation attempt there at Joshua Tree after his overdose. My wife did the art for the project, which was a lot of fun. It’savailable for viewing for free on my website. I’m also currently thinking about trying to do a book-length poem structured around a central initiating event that spirals out in different directions. Hopefully more on that soon. 


Jonathan Fink is Professor and Coordinator of Creative Writing at University of West Florida. His most recent book of poetry is Don’t Do It—We Love You, My Heart (Dzanc, 2025). He has also received the Editors’ Prize in Poetry from The Missouri Review, the McGinnis-Ritchie Prize for Nonfiction/Essay from Southwest Review, the Porter Fleming Award in Poetry, and fellowships from the National Endowment for the Arts, Joshua Tree National Park, the Florida Division of Cultural Affairs, and Emory University, among other institutions.

Share

A Year of Growth

Jonathan Fink

 

My youngest daughter does not know

that each tree ring marks a year of growth

when she selects a piece of scrap wood

 

from the sawdust and shavings

that have covered our back patio

and carries the board inside to color

 

the rings revealed by the saw blade,

my daughter filling the arching semicircles

until a rainbow appears as her sisters

 

lay other scraps across the floor to make

a path on which to leap from board to board

to furniture and back again in a game,

 

I imagine, every child in history has played,

the game requiring only the belief

that the ground is not as solid as it seems,

 

that a misstep or tip of balance will lead

to peril, whether lava or river or canyon below,

even though, while laughing, they jump again,

 

shrugging off each demise, protesting

only when I collect the boards

and insist that the world be ordered

 

over their appeals to fairness,

the mantra of childhood, to which

I and every parent I know responds,

 

Who says the world is fair? mostly resisting,

though sometimes not, to itemize,

while wielding a clothes-less Barbie

 

or broken toy like a judge’s gavel,

every slight from work and love

and politics both foreign and domestic

 

as the neighbor’s dog howls at the burgeoning

moon and the kids give each other that look

meaning, What’s got into dad—all we meant

 

was we were having fun? which is when

I see myself reflected in the glass

of the patio sliding doors and realize

 

how large I must seem to them,

large, though clearly not authoritative,

as the youngest starts spacing

 

the boards again behind my back,

and I lift one and point to the rings

in the grain, and say, see, this too

 

was once alive, how, though rooted,

it turned it leaves to the warmth of the sun

and drew water from the earth, its limbs

 

not unlike yours when you lift the hems

of your skirts to hop through puddles,

or wave to me from the treehouse

 

we are building together, a project begun

before the passing of their grandmother

though intersecting now with her loss

 

as grief permeates all things, and they ask

the questions one would expect

(if she looks down on them from above

 

just as they, from the tree, look down on me)

and the questions one doesn’t expect

about how the tree feels holding

 

the remains of another tree in its limbs,

transformed, though it is, to a house,

and I tell them trees aren’t capable

 

of abstract thought or have feelings

like we do, though what do I know,

thinking of Michelangelo’s Pieta,

 

and Mary, though stone, holding

her deceased son, and how the body

is itself a house of memory and love

 

and loss, as my wife and I explained

to our daughters, that the sadness they feel

is sadness, yes, but also love transformed,

 

that grief is love for the one who was lost,

just as my wife expressed on the day

before her mother died, after a month

 

of hospice at her mother’s home and the gift,

my wife said, to be there with her,

to measure and administer the morphine

 

when the great pain came, when any touch,

even a blanket, became unbearable,

to honor the effort at the end for her to stand,

 

holding to the walker, and request what would be

her final bath, and my wife, afterwards,

drawing a comb through the fineness of her hair,

 

never more beautiful, my wife saying

that night, and again the next day

even after the workers had come so quickly

 

to take her, to gather and remove

any remaining meds, count every pill

as her final breath still hung in the air,

 

and our daughters cried unceasingly

so that when, that night, we drove away,

the trees that lined the road seemed to bow

 

to the car, to lift their limbs in the breeze,

the undersides of their leaves lighter

than the backs, like the palms of hands,

 

which, I believed, if they could,

they would place on our car, on the shoulders

of my wife, or interweave their limbs

 

as a canopy above us, their petals

below, and the road would no longer

be a road but a tunnel, to where it ascended

 

I did not know, only that we were

like breath released at last from the throat,

becoming the words we were unable to say.

Share

The Bigfoot Parade

Will Musgrove

 

As the high school band warmed up down Main Street, Kerry slipped the folded napkin under the wiper of the rusted Ford in the Sneakers Grill parking lot. Written on the napkin in Sharpie were the words I’M PREGNANT, CALL ME, followed by a random phone number. Since life messed with us, we messed with it. It was something to do until he and I got out of Podunk. We lived in a small Midwest town, everyone rattling around like the leftover screws from a piece of IKEA furniture.

 

The door to Sneakers Grill opened. The smell of fried mozzarella sticks drifted on stale, air-conditioned air into the Fuck You July heat, and we took hungry breaths. A family of three, a mom, dad, and son, all wearing We Believe Bigfoot hats, exited the sports bar to search for a spot along the parade route. They nudged their way past fellow believers and disappeared.

 

Everyone in town had their own Bigfoot story except for Kerry and me. My uncle Gary claimed he’d once seen Bigfoot break up a fistfight outside Walmart before vanishing in the trees behind the big-box store. Bigfoot was always performing good deeds, a local superhero, someone you could count on in a pinch.

 

If the missing link existed, why would it care about a small town of slaughterhouse workers, a town where all there is to do is look to the woods for help? Sometimes, I’d put on the Bigfoot onesie pajamas my parents got me for Christmas and wander outside. When someone spotted me and called for help, I ran in the opposite direction. I’d run until I was alone and panting, feeling like I could squish the whole town between my fingertips, feeling like I was better than this place because I recognized a costume when I saw one.

 

Kerry wrote something on another napkin, and the high school band marched down Main. Above the row of spectators, I watched the band members’ hairy hats bob up and down. They looked like groundhogs poking their heads up to see if it’s safe to come out. A float featuring a giant papier-mâché Bigfoot crept along behind the band. Candy scattered the curb, and Kerry and I shoved our way to the front.

 

We stuffed Jolly Ranchers and Tootsie Rolls into our pockets. A middle-aged woman accused us of being too old, but we ignored her and kept grabbing. When our pockets were full, Kerry spun and asked the woman why her precious Bigfoot hadn’t stopped us. To avoid getting our asses kicked, I grabbed Kerry’s arm and dragged him away. Then we walked down the block to the Kum & Go gas station.

 

“I can’t wait to get the hell out of here,” Kerry said. We leaned against the fuel pumps. We didn’t have a grand getaway plan. I guess we hoped we’d wake up one day and be somewhere else, somewhere where no one believed in Bigfoot.

 

Kerry went into the gas station to get a couple of Cokes. I waited outside. Bored, I retrieved a plastic fork from a garbage can and held the fork to my face. I watched the world through the tines. My older cousin Jack’s truck pulled in. Last I’d seen him, he’d just started work at the slaughterhouse, saving to escape, like us. He wasn’t a believer either. He compared believing in Bigfoot to believing in Santa Claus.

 

He got out of his truck, smiling and wearing a We Believe hat. I studied him through the fork’s tines, how he stood behind bars. When he noticed me, I wondered if he saw the same.

Share

Slowdeatha

Andrew Brininstool

 

I.

 

Rochelle Pickford had gone to El Paso for a lip injection, but the esthetician had been distracted and the Restylane meant for the organ tissue had instead gone into one of the veins. Rochelle’s lips bruised a deep blue-gray, as did most of her right cheek. She was a bad sight. There was nothing to be done about it except to put ice on the bruise and take Valtrex. She didn’t want to see anybody for a few days. But when the doorbell rang on a Friday afternoon and she peeked through the blinds and saw that it was her neighbor, a young man named Ryan, she answered anyway.

 

“Don’t look at me.”

 

He wasn’t. He had more pressing matters. He held a goat in his arms as though it were a child. “I’m sorry,” he told her. “I have to go out of town. I wasn’t expecting this.” He wanted her to look after the goat. “It doesn’t need much. Just leave it in the backyard. I’ve got a stake and a leash. Put a bowl of water out. Don’t worry about feeding him. I won’t be gone long. Like I said, I’ve already fed Cline.”

 

Then he was gone, and Rochelle was holding the goat. It happened so fast.

 

She didn’t care for goats. She didn’t care for animals in general, but goats especially. Once, when she was young and visiting her uncle in Kansas, a billy goat had butted her in the ass, sending her flying a few feet across the backyard. It was humiliating and terrifying—the first truly frightening experience in her recollection. The adults all laughed as though they’d never seen such divine comedy before.

 

But Ryan was recently divorced, Rochelle knew. And he’d looked pained to leave Cline with her. Whatever had forced him to leave town must’ve been important. Rochelle still believed you could count on your neighbors.

 

Not that the goat didn’t spook her.

 

To take her mind off of it, she put on a lot of rouge and a wide pair of sunglasses and ran some errands. She dropped off drapes to be hemmed. She went over to the Steven’s Inn and found some of her friends drinking coffee in the restaurant.

 

“I look hideous.”

 

“Hush.”

 

“It’s karaoke at the lounge.”

 

“You know I can’t sing,” Rochelle said.

 

“None of us will be singing. We’ll be playing the slots.”

 

“I might stay home tonight.”

 

“Really, Roche. Your lips don’t look that awful.”

 

“It isn’t that. I’ve taken on a responsibility.”

 

Nobody asked for details.

 

“Dale might be there,” one of them said.

 

Rochelle was glad to be wearing sunglasses. She didn’t want to react. Dale Envers had been her crush forty years earlier. They were town rats in this sleepy mesa of the Chihuahuan plains. They’d had Honors English together, and Dale played baseball. He was smart and often told Rochelle she was smart, too. Smart enough to get into UNM, or maybe even St. John’s. Rochelle didn’t believe him, but Dale had been right about UNM. And she would have attended if, the summer beforehand, she hadn’t met Charlie Pickford, a Penn graduate who’d moved to the area as a geologist. He had been a fine man, and they’d had what Charlie’s snobby brother once called a “little life” together. It was a throwaway comment, but Charlie never spoke to his brother again. Funny. The comment never bothered Rochelle. What more was there to be had? They joined the country club, the Rotary, the Elks. At the time of Charlie’s death, they’d saved enough money to travel—something he had wanted in retirement. It was unfortunate they’d never made good on his dream, but Rochelle was ashamed to admit that the fact left her relieved. She never wanted to see the world. The world scared her.

 

 

When she got home she watched Cline, out in the backyard. He’d found the stump of a pecan tree and was perched upon it, staring out onto the golf course. The tree had had anthracnose, and Charlie cut it down years ago. Now the goat was there.

 

 

At 7:30 p.m., she decided to go to the Lodge. At 7:45, she decided against it. She drew a bath. Five minutes later she drained the bath and drove the short distance up to the hill where Lodge #1558 stood, the stucco repainted the white of a bleached bone.

 

She used to love coming here. Charlie would come home from work early and try on a new suit jacket and make them each a tipple while Rochelle did her makeup. Then, as Charlie pulled their car up the steep drive to the lodge, Rochelle would crane her neck to see which of her friends’ sedans were in the lot.

 

Now it was filled with dually pickups caked in dust. Their back windows had decals of derricks spewing oil. My Boyfriend Slings Pipe, some of them read. Or: Drill ‘er Deep Pull ‘er Wet. The newcomers filled the Lodge with cigar smoke. They wore jeans. They ordered beer and whiskey all night. Many of the fieldworkers had wives back home, but that didn’t seem to matter: little tarty things sat in their laps. As she entered the Lodge Rochelle heard somebody singing, “Up Against the Wall, Redneck Mother,” and the workers hooted and bayed. By the grace of god, the slot machines sat off away from the lounge in a converted coat closet.

 

It was so much more pleasant here. Here, the machines chirped and rang. They cast red and yellow lights along the ceiling and carpet. Rochelle’s favorite was called The Mystical Lamp. It was a five-reel game; when you hit it big a strange creature, a genie, rose from a cartoon lamp on the digital screen and congratulated you. It was nice to win, but the eyes of the genie flashed in an unsettling way.

 

Her friends were already at the machines.

 

“You made it.”

 

“I won’t be staying long. I’ve taken on a responsibility. You know my young neighbor? His name is Ryan. I’m caring for his goat while he is out of town.”

 

“Did you say a goat?”

 

“You should see how Ryan cares for it. It’s as though the goat were his own child.”

 

“That’s strange.”

 

Rochelle placed the first of her Elks coins inside The Mystical Lamp and pulled its lever. “People do all sorts of strange things when they’re going through something like a divorce.”

 

Someone out in the lounge was screaming a hideous song. Its chorus went: “Pooour some sugar on me!”

 

The Mystical Lamp lit up. It chimed and squealed, and the genie appeared. His wicked grin and eyes congratulated Rochelle before the machine spit out eight tokens.

 

“I didn’t mean strange to be bad. Remember when Charlie died and you spent so much time up in Santa Fe with that group of mystics?”

 

Rochelle said nothing.

 

“I’m sorry. I shouldn’t have brought it up.”

 

“No, it’s okay. I think it’s just the medication I’m taking for these lips, is all.”

 

“They don’t look as awful as you think.”

 

 

Her friends left around 9:00. Rochelle stayed behind. She was hopeful to see Dale, and at 9:15, he walked into the slot machine room.

 

Rochelle swiveled in her chair and acted as though she hadn’t noticed. When he finally said hello, Rochelle didn’t know what to say. “I’m up six dollars.”

 

“I just got back from Odessa,” he told her. “We had a court case this morning.”

 

“How did it go?”

 

He didn’t say anything. It was clear he’d been drinking on the drive home. Dale hadn’t, in the end, gone to UNM or St. John’s. Instead he went to a tiny college in Oregon, received a law degree, and disappeared for a while. When he finally came home, he was a changed man. That’s what everybody said. There were a lot of rumors about what had happened to him. He’d gone crazy, or he’d done too many drugs in South America. Rochelle didn’t care what people said. Dale Envers was the smartest man she’d ever known.

 

The genie’s eyes lit up. A chime belted. Elks coins fell onto the tray.

 

“Look at you,” Dale said.

 

“I’m lucky tonight.”

 

“You always have been.”

 

“I don’t know about that!”

 

Drinks at the Lodge came in small plastic cups. Dale ordered them both a drink, and he drank his fast. His hands and fingers were massive, and the skin on his knuckles was dry and cracked.

 

“Are you going to play?” Rochelle asked. “The machines are loose.”

 

Dale looked uncomfortable on the stool, like a circus animal. He crossed his big arms and peered into the lounge. “I don’t know what to do anymore,” he muttered.

 

“Dale? You know how I’m always getting into things? You won’t even imagine what I’ve signed myself up for this time. I’ve taken on a responsibility. Do you recall that young man who—”

 

“They’re changing everything, Rochelle.”

 

“What do you mean?”

 

“Look around. Do you remember how this place used to be?”

 

“Yes.”

 

“Now look.”

 

“I know. It breaks my heart. They used to require a jacket for the men, and for the ladies—”

 

“I don’t mean that. I mean they’re changing everything. The world is off-kilter. Do you know what these fracking bastards are doing in our town? Do you know what they’re doing?”

 

“You mean with the drilling.”

 

“I’m talking the very ground beneath us. They’re pumping water into the ground, fresh clean water that can never be used again. And we have a water restriction in place! We’re in a drought!” A morsel of spit clung to his lip. “And the sinkholes.” He paused. “They’re changing the very geography of this place. The entire goddamn earth, Rochelle.”

 

“Would you like another drink?”

 

“In Odessa,” he said to her, “there’s nothing but white trucks. For miles. Corporate white trucks. And meanwhile the water there is turning cancerous. It’s sulfatic. You can taste it. Children have learning disabilities. Slowdeatha, the residents are calling the town now. Their own town. They mean it as a joke. As in, they don’t really give a shit.”

 

He turned and looked at her as though for the first time. “Your lips.”

 

She blushed. “I know. They’re hideous.”

 

He kissed her, hard. Pain rose through her face and entered her right eye. She thought she was going to go blind. In fact, she did go blind. She heard him tell her he was sorry, but when she could finally see again, Dale Envers was gone. Rochelle collected her earnings from The Mystery Lamp and drove home.

 

 

She couldn’t sleep after that. She ran cold water over her wrists. She poured a glass of wine but felt too dizzy to finish it.

 

She turned on her floodlight.

 

Cline was there, staring at the new light that’d come over him. He hadn’t moved from the pecan stump. He wore a strange grin. She didn’t know how goats slept. This one, apparently, didn’t. The only thing Rochelle knew about goats was that they ate everything. Was it true, or a myth? She decided to find out. She went to the pantry and grabbed a can of black beans. From the freezer she took out a carton of fish sticks. She went out onto the patio.

 

Cline didn’t move. He stared at her. She opened the can and dug her fingers in and pulled out a handful of beans and felt them in her palms, her fingers, before tossing them. They scattered in the dirt. The goat didn’t move. In the mornings, Rochelle often came out here to read the paper; the second fairway was just beyond her gate, and she’d wave at the golfers and take in all that green. But at nights, without light or trees the course gave way to a vast nothingness. The only light was on Cline. It was Rochelle and the goat and nothing around them.

 

The animal hopped down from the stump and inched forward and ate the beans. Rochelle was shocked. She tossed more. Cline ate them. She tossed the entire can into the yard. She expected Cline to eat the can, but he gave it a lazy look and flicked one of his ears at her. Rochelle tore open the box of fish sticks and scattered them throughout the yard. They were still frozen, but Cline followed their path, eating each one without trouble. Finally, he found the empty box. Rochelle watched Cline sniff at it.

 

“Eat this,” Rochelle said and pulled from her purse a few of her Elks coins. She approached the goat, holding her palm out. “Eat them,” she said.

 

Cline pulled one of the coins into his mouth. She felt the goat’s warm tongue on her palm. He chewed and swallowed.

 

“Good,” Rochelle said. “Yes, that’s right. Eat them all.”

 

The animal stared at her. He stopped and was quiet, and Rochelle stared at him and waited. “Come on,” she whispered.

 

The goat looked at her and screamed the scream of a child victim. The noise went out over the neighborhood, over the golf course, over the river. Rochelle rushed inside and turned off the lights.

 

 

Sometimes she dreamt of the day, early in her marriage, when she’d asked Charlie just exactly it was he did for a living. In response, Charlie had taken her in their new car out along Highway 62 to the escarpment and led her up onto one of the shorter mesas. They stood in the dirt near a lechuguilla patch. “Look there,” he said and pointed south, toward the Guadalupe Mountains. “That was once a massive ocean reef.” Long before dinosaurs, he told her, there’d been a great big sea right here, right where they were standing. It’d been filled with sponges and algae, brachiopods, trilobites, single-celled fusulinids, and snails and fish so strange she could not even imagine they once called Earth their home. The seas dried, he said, and minerals preserved the dead. “And now,” Charlie told her, “we use them to live.”

 

 

She woke late. Her lips throbbed. They felt as though they would burst. It took her a while to piece the previous evening together. She went out onto the patio and saw the coins, covered with mucous, in the yard. The goat was missing. He wasn’t anywhere. She worried that if Cline had gotten out onto the golf course, she’d have her membership revoked. She pictured him chewing up the fairways, eating the begonias near the clubhouse. She called. Nobody had seen him.

 

Rochelle didn’t wait to get dressed. Without makeup, in her pajamas, she took to driving around town. She drove up and down Canal Street, over to Halagueno Boulevard. She followed San Pedro Street as it snaked alongside the San Pedro arroyo. The wide creek used to run irrigation from the Pecos for cucumber and onion farms, but it’d been dried by the frackers. Now it held hillocks of box springs and shopping carts. Soon the houses grew smaller; the yards went from St. Augustine to lava rocks. She was in Alegre Vista, the bad part of town. Here the houses had ramps instead of steps. Here were cut-out-of-your-house obese people, hiding behind bedrooms with quilts for drapes.

 

“Cline!” she shouted from the window, driving slowly. “Cline!”

 

Some people looked at her. She knew what they were thinking. A woman with a battered face, looking for her husband.

 

She had no idea what to do. She knew nothing about goats. She knew nothing of their internal lives, their desires—what drove them to escape a backyard or what might drive them to return. She would have given up if she could think of a single thing to tell Ryan that would not break his heart.

 

Later in the afternoon, at a home in Alegre Vista, an unpainted wooden place that looked collaged together from parts of other, long-gone houses, she spotted a small herd of goats in the backyard.

 

“These are my goats,” the old man told her. She’d been out near the fence posts, eyeing the herd. The man must’ve seen her through his back window.

 

“I’m looking for one. His name is Cline. He’s black and brown, and he escaped my backyard early this morning or, who knows, perhaps last night.”

 

“Nope,” the old man said. “These are my goats.”

 

Rochelle didn’t move from the fence. She inspected every one of the goats in the herd. None of them appeared to be Cline.

 

“Get on out,” the old man told her.

 

She left and drove far out from the town, out along the highway and then down a county road of hardened chip seal. The road passed a mobile home park before flattening out along the plains of the desert. This used to be a ranch, owned by a wealthy family. Now there were warning signs everywhere—there were signs all over town. The road thinned to two lanes with no center stripe. The sun was big and white, and the sky looked anemic, as though it were an overexposed photograph.

 

She needed to collect herself. She needed to come up with something to tell Ryan. She understood now that in these years since Charlie’s death she had only been faking her way along, faking it every day: at the slots or at coffee, at church, in the produce aisle. Now with the lips. Now with Dale Envers.

 

Rochelle pulled over to compose herself. She put her hazards on and searched the console for tissues. She found some, wadded and coffee stained, and dried her eyes and cleared her nose. She told herself she was going to be okay, that she had, within her, a deep well of resource and strength. She took a few breaths before looking out to the north, out at a long dry stretch of nearly white desert pocked with creosote bushes and bright red budding ocotillo—a mile or two shy of a pump jack. Cline stood there alone, staring back at her.

 

She took her time. She laughed. She opened the door and stepped out onto the road. “Cline,” she said, and felt relief. “Cline!” she said and walked across the county road. Nobody was out here. The wind was still. Rochelle carefully pulled apart the barbed wire and let herself through, making sure her pajamas did not catch. “Let’s go home now,” she called out and smiled. Cline waited for her. He made a strange movement with his jaw, as though he knew what she was saying. As though he were agreeing with her. “I forgive you,” she said to him and slowly stepped toward him. Cline did not move. He whipped his tail and nodded again. “You’re a good boy,” she said, and, when she was near, slowly took him into her arms and embraced him the way she’d seen her neighbor embrace him. And had you been passing by, had you seen the hazards blinking on the sedan and slowed and looked off to the north for the car’s owner—had you looked in time—you’d have witnessed the world open wide and take inside itself a woman in her pajamas along with a small goat.

 

II.

 

On the evening Ryan and Kendra first pulled into town, a great dark plume of smoke seemed to rise from the ground and hover above Canal Street and darken out the neon signs of the motels and fast food restaurants. This cloud did tricks. It changed shapes, recategorizing itself from a blob into a taut arrow, a diamond, a V. “Look,” Ryan said. “Bats.” Kendra glanced at them for a moment before yawning and going back to her phone.

 

This was the detail TOWBoss had wanted men in their subreddit to find: the moment they knew they’d lost their wives. TOWBoss said it was often not a slap in the face or a tearful fight, but something more mundane. He told users to do something physically exerting and to take days, weeks even, to hone in on the moment that useless cunt ruined your life. He created a thread for responses: The Cunting of America.

 

Ryan found the group by accident. He’d Googled “signs of depression” and “divorce depression” and then “divorce guilty.” And he kept Googling until he found men who felt no guilt nor depression, but searing rage.

 

They railed against the Duluth Model, against vasectomies—what one Redditor called “self-cucking.” A theater in Michigan posted an Equal Pay Night, wherein men paid 25 percent extra for a ticket. The subreddit was outraged. They, along with a pickup artists’ subreddit, flooded the phone lines until the theater had to change numbers. They purchased an entire theater’s worth of tickets and believed the business would be dismayed when nobody showed up.

 

Initially, Ryan didn’t relate to most of the men going through divorce. A lot of them were wealthier than he was. Older, with children. But the rage was something he shared. He read the sub late at nights, after drinking. Some of the men spammed a college’s rape report form with dozens of false reports. Ryan didn’t partake, but he watched the post-act banter.

 

Kendra had left, just left, one day while he was at work. Her things were still in their house. The plan had been for her to become a veterinarian, but she’d failed a few courses and before long Ryan had a job offer far away from the Mid-Atlantic. The job paid well. He’d be working as an engineer for an oil concern. Kendra wouldn’t say yes or no. She lay in bed all day. This was an answer in itself. Finally, not knowing how to convince her, Ryan had purchased a goat at a market. Kendra still had not said yes, though when the time came she climbed into the car with the kid in her hands and told Ryan its name was Cline. He smiled, and they headed west. She left the goat at the house, too.

 

When she had finally called it was from a phone with an Annapolis area code. Annapolis was where she’d grown up. She had family there and old friends. And old boyfriends.

 

It wasn’t uncommon for Ryan to call her at night. Kendra would listen as he asked for a second try or pointed out her many flaws—it was her failure, not his, that’d led them out west—or accused her of cheating or asked if his cock wasn’t big enough, if he was too fat or not romantic enough. If she wanted to date a Black man, a Jew. And Kendra would listen patiently, not saying a word until he was done shouting and done crying. And finally she would say, ultimately, there wasn’t anything to say.

 

After hanging up, he’d hit the thread.

 

At work, when he caught himself looking at a female coworker and thinking slut or gash or cumwhore, he felt guilty only for a second before reminding himself of what TOWBoss had said: this was how Ryan had always really felt. This was Ryan finally being true to himself.

 

He’d never played youth sports. He hadn’t joined a fraternity in college. He’d spent his time alone and happy, he thought, and totally confused at this term he always heard, community, and why people put so much emphasis on it. But one night last week he found himself drunk on gin and weeping with joy for having found ToughToeNails3 and Raw_Hide_ and CraveMore, and TOWBoss, their fearless leader; and when TOWBoss posted about the retreat, Ryan was quick to say he’d be there and was there anything he could bring—anything at all.

 

 

The retreat was held in the tall grass alongside the Rio Costilla, not far from the Colorado state line. There was an RV park and campground further to the south, near where the Mesa Stream and the Cordillera Ditch came together, but TOWBoss had told them no way was he paying the fees, and anyway, they were Free Men.

 

In the winters there were no streams at all, but it was late spring now, and the Rocky Mountain runoff had formed a fast-moving gulley ample with cutthroat trout.

As soon as Ryan arrived he realized he’d made a few miscalculations. He’d assumed the retreat was for getting wasted and talking about women and that the fishing was only a pretext. This was not the case. The men he saw were all in waders and very seriously going about fly-fishing the gulley. Their tents, nearly all of them military-grade canvas, were set up immaculately, taut as drums, not even flapping in the mountain wind. Ryan had stopped in Albuquerque on the way up and had purchased a little pup tent. His rod was all wrong: a spin fishing rig that’d cost him twenty-five dollars. He felt ridiculous unpacking his gear and ridiculous moreover when the other men looked back and spotted him but did nothing more than nod and return to the stream. The wind was coming off the mountains all wrong, forcing Ryan’s hat off his head and making him run beyond the parked SUVs to catch it; and he struggled with the tent poles—what maniac had designed this thing?—and out of embarrassment acted as though he were doing a high-concept comedy act about a man who could not put a tent together. The few men who looked on did not laugh. Ryan wanted to toss his gear in the Subaru and leave.

 

Finally, a squat man came to him and offered a hand. “TOWBoss,” he said. Ryan was taken back. TOWBoss had described his ex as being superhot but batshit. Ryan had figured TOWBoss to be a young and handsome devil. Instead, here stood a man in his fifties, graying, with a mustache.

 

“I’m Ryan.”

 

TOWBoss looked up from the tent poles and grimaced. “Yeah, we still go by our Reddit handles here. For the sake of maintaining anonymity.”

 

“Okay,” Ryan said. “So for the rest of the weekend, I’m still SamDongleson?”

 

TOWBoss nodded. “Over there is SemperFi4121, Luv_StuffNM, CarlosZeroShits, and SquirtMaster500.”

 

“Where is ToughToeNails3?” SamDongleson asked.

 

“Stuck in traffic outside Denver. He’ll be here.”

 

Soon TOWBoss had SamDongleson’s tent up. Looking it over, TOWBoss said, “I hope you have a zero-degree bag. It gets awful cold up here at nights.”

 

SamDongleson lied. He’d brought his duvet from home.

 

After TOWBoss introduced him to the clan, and the clan simply nodded, he asked SamDongleson if he had his tackle with him. Before he could answer, TOWBoss marched to SamDongleson’s campsite and returned with the rod. SamDongleson’s face went hot, but after an inspection, TOWBoss said, “Don’t let anybody tell you you can’t catch good fish with one of these. I had a rig like this as a boy. Held onto it through college. Best rod I ever had.”

 

He handed it to SamDongleson. The other men, each of whom had handmade and intricate flies attached to their vests or hats, quit casting. They waited. SamDongleson took the rod and cast the line out in a long, whispering arch. The line went on forever. It was a glorious cast, a strong and strange cast, and when it came back to him, a trout was on the end.

 

 

It was true that the campsite turned cold when the sun went down, but SamDongleson didn’t mind it. His catch on the first try had become an instant legend among the men. Never mind that the fish was too small to keep. They kept it anyway. SemperFi4121 had smashed its head against a rock and handed the lifeless thing back to SamDongleson. “Take it home and have it mounted.”

 

SamDongleson laughed.

 

“I’m serious. This is a feat worth remembering.”

 

Now, at 8:00 in the evening, the men cooked beans and hamburgers and poured whiskey into cups with Diet Coke and talked about SamDongleson’s catch in a way that made his chest feel big. By 9:30, any trepidation SamDongleson first felt had melted away. The whiskey and the campfire made his face warm, and when he pulled his duvet from the Subaru and wrapped himself in it—and when the other subredditors let out a communal chortle loud enough to bounce along the arroyo—SamDongleson knew it was in good fun, that these men were rapidly becoming brothers to him. He was to become a reference point in their conversations for years. He pictured newcomers to the subreddit. Tell me the duvet story. Fill me in. And SemperFi4121 and Luv_StuffNM and CarlosZeroShits and SquirtMaster500 would let the little pups know just exactly what a classic moment they’d missed out on.

 

Something that struck him was how mild-mannered, even shy, the men were. If they bumped your elbow or knocked over your drink, they were quick with an apology. There was nothing of the anger SamDongleson had expected. If, initially, this had let him down, he soon came to appreciate it. The men finished their meals and tossed the paper plates and plastic forks into the fire and watched the fire change colors as it melted away the chemicals. They told jokes and farted. They stayed out of the deep waters that’d brought them all together—at least at first. It wasn’t until 11:00 that night, when CarlosZeroShits pulled out a joint and the men shared it, that the nature of the outing began to shift. SamDongleson hadn’t smoked pot since high school, and this stuff was a new strain from Colorado, and it sat with him weird, a little too powerful.

 

An older guy, redheaded except where the crown of his head poked through, steeple-steep and burned by the sun, said: “Sometimes, when I think about Helen, I remember that when I snored she had me sleep on the floor of the bedroom. She swore the flatness helped my snoring. She said I didn’t snore when I was down there.  I resented her for it. I felt like a dog or a slave or something. I’d lie there all night, just seething with anger. And then something funny happened. I came to enjoy the floor. I looked forward to it. In fact, I began fake snoring so that she could order me to the floor.” He paused, his hands folded in front of him. “Isn’t that sick?”

 

“Unless you’ve worked on it,” Luv_StuffNM.

 

“What does that mean?”

 

CarlosZeroShits said, “He means unless you’ve turned it into some kind of kink.”

 

“Oh, hell.”

 

“We aren’t here to kink-shame.”

 

The redhead went to retort, but instead he just let out a strange, nervous chuckle. The men were quiet. SamDongleson stared up at the stars.

 

Another man said, “I get to see my two kids every other weekend. I’ve come to dread those weekends. Marsha hasn’t moved in with another guy, but I’m gathering there’s one. And the reality is? I don’t care. At all. About her or about the guy. And I’m beginning to lose interest in my two children. One day they’ll be a new family, and I won’t be a part of that, and it used to keep me up at night but doesn’t bother me at all now.”

 

The conversation went on like this, but SamDongleson didn’t like it. The stories were lame. They were pathetic. Finally, they were clichéd, something he could have heard from any limp-wristed group therapy session in the basement of a church. He straightened himself and prepared to tell them about Kendra and the goat, but just as he began, one of the men said, “You hear that?”

 

“What?”

 

“Be quiet. Listen.”

 

They listened.

 

“Someone’s out there. Someone’s stalking us.”

 

The men looked at each other. TOWBoss stood and produced a buck knife from his boot. The other men followed his lead; SemperFi4121 had a little .22 pistol in his satchel, and he looked more than happy to brandish it. The men went down from the campsite into the arroyo and crept along the gulley, listening for something. TOWBoss raised his hand. The men waited. “Over there!” he said, and they followed him across the gulley, sprinting through the water and up and over the other bar. Then they were in dense juniper brush. They squatted and listened. SemperFi4121 pulled the action on the pistol. “I see it,” TOWBoss said, and a moment later he was screaming and running with his knife out. SemperFi4121 cracked the pistol twice in the air and followed him. None of the rest moved. When the pair returned, TOWBoss had an Allsup’s bag on the end of his knife. A small, wrinkled plastic bag. The men looked at each other and fell out laughing.

 

 

SamDongleson woke up around 5:00 that morning, still drunk. The rest of the men were already at the fire, making coffee. He wrapped the duvet around himself and joined them, but before he could say anything a pair of headlights strafed the site. They disappeared, returned.

 

“Must be ToughToeNails3,” TOWBoss said.

But soon the lights were multicolored, red and blue, and a door opened. Soon somebody was shining a flashlight down onto them. It was a park ranger.

 

She was young and redheaded and wider than SamDongleson, with her brown pants pulled high above her midsection. They watched the ranger struggle down the rocky embankment and into the tall grass. She trained the flashlight on each of their faces.

 

“Y’all have a permit to be down here?”

 

None of them responded.

 

She looked at the Igloo where SamDongleson’s trout sat on ice. “What about a fishing permit?”

 

They were quiet.

 

The ranger responded to a call from her shoulder mic. Her breath was deep in the cold air. She looked at each of them again for a long while but didn’t move or say anything.

 

Ryan found himself saying, “You know, if we ran, who could you possibly catch?”

 

The ranger’s face went red. Or perhaps it was already red from the cold. It didn’t matter. The men giggled. The ranger pointed her flashlight square into his eyes. He knew he was smiling; he knew he was still drunk.

 

“I’ll be back,” she said, and left in the cruiser.

 

The group howled. They hugged Ryan.

 

Only TOWBoss kept his distance. Later he said, “She will be back, you know.”

 

“She won’t,” Ryan said. Ryan said he needed to take a leak, and he moved into a nearby thicket. The men were still laughing.

 

 

His tent was the last one down. It was not yet noon but close, and only Ryan and TOWBoss were left at the campsite. TOWBoss poured more water onto the firepit, making certain the embers were dead. He looked for trash and placed it into a trash bag and then tightened, once more, the cables holding the kayaks to the roof of his car. Ryan ran his hand through his short beard and thought about telling TOWBoss about the goat, about Cline. But there wasn’t any point. It was a boring story, and Ryan had decided to get rid of the animal as soon as he got back to town.

 

He waved goodbye and left TOWBoss to finish packing. On the road leaving the Rio Costilla, Ryan felt freed from a burden. He was hungover but happy, and by the time he merged onto the highway, he sang along to “Ramblin’ Man” on the radio. He passed through Taos going too fast, and soon he was south of Santa Fe and its traffic and into the badlands along US Route 285.

 

He stopped for gas in Vaughn. A thunderstorm was threatening to the west, pulling itself together like the bunches of a skirt. A man, some kid, was wandering between the pumping stations smacked out of his gourd. Ryan offered him five dollars, but the kid grabbed him by the wrist and stared at him. “You’re a hollowed-out soul if I’ve seen one.” Then the kid ran away from him, looking terrified.

 

“What the fuck was that?” Ryan muttered. He got back in the car and turned on the radio. He let the tuner scan, hoping to hear something about the weather and what he could expect for the rest of the drive home. He heard a voice come through, far off, hardly intelligible from the static. He turned the dial and listened more intently. It was clear that the voice was in a language he did not understand, and he turned the radio off and drove for a while, preferring the silence.

Share

That Boy When You Were Sixteen

Jacqueline Doyle

 

Let’s say there was a beautiful boy when you were sixteen. Tall and skinny in the way of adolescent boys, he had long eyelashes and smelled like Old Spice deodorant. His bare skin felt very warm when you buried your face in his chest. The two of you spent every afternoon after school making out in his bedroom while his mom was at work. He had an unzipped sleeping bag he used as a bedspread. The plaid flannel lining smelled faintly of unwashed boy and sweat and cum and Old Spice, smells you liked because you associated them with the way his hands and tongue made you feel, and the excitement of taking off some of your clothes and leaving on others and saying no and saying yes, oh yes.

 

Let’s say none of that is true. Let’s say there was no boy, and what you remember from the year you were sixteen is being mouthy in classes and yelling at your mother and listening to the Doors holed up in your room and standing on the sidelines at mixers. And this: riding your bicycle in a sudden thunderstorm as evening is about to fall, coasting down a long steep hill, drenched, ice cold, exuberant. You thought you would never get away from the suburb you’d lived in your entire life, where everyone cared more about money and conformity than spirit or intellect or art and where there wasn’t a single boy who liked you. Soon enough there’d be college and lots of boys, and you’d take off your clothes and say yes, yes, oh yes. Beautiful boys whose names you no longer remember. But that year, you were alone.

 

You never imagined you’d look back at that sixteen-year-old girl and exult in her fierce integrity. Anyone at sixteen can imagine a boy with long eyelashes, after all. And you can imagine him now, balding, gone soft with a paunch, or maybe even gone to an early grave. A heart attack, cancer. You like the girl, though, still very much alive. She nods when you look for her in the mirror, unabashed and defiant, grateful for the life you managed to give her, grateful that she got away from everything she despised. Surprised, really, at what she couldn’t have foreseen: the power of her imagination and where it would take her and how it’s all turned out.

 

Let’s say there’s no such thing as a happy ending. It’s a shock to see her, the unhappy sixteen-year-old girl, and realize she never imagined that you’d get so old or that you couldn’t go back to being that young. You can say now that the beautiful boy you wanted so badly when you were sixteen didn’t matter at all, but you were so anguished then. Maybe it would have helped, if there’d been a beautiful boy. And now you’re happily married to a beautiful man, you have a beautiful son, but you worry about them. Are they healthy? Are they content? What if this or that disaster occurred? Life pushes you forward when you’d rather linger, but you really have no control over the accelerating pace or the final destination, coming so much faster and sooner than you ever expected. You’re getting closer every day, whether you like it or not.

 

Let’s say you accept that. Let’s say you don’t. Let’s say there’s a point where imagination fails you. But you haven’t reached it yet. Let’s just say.

Share

Tiniest Champagne 

Nick Mandernach

 

For no reason I was cruelest to Mom. I groaned when her hearing got bad, forgot birthdays, stole thirty-four thousand dollars. I knew I’d make it right, but didn’t know how. When she got her mouth cancer, I jumped on it. Makeup work dried up, so I left my apartment and boyfriend to be caregiver for the last months of her illness. Mom bought my ticket, set up a room in the back house, died the morning before I got there.

 

I loved my mom and want to tell you something about her. I want you to know how she fought with Spirit Airlines in the fall of ‘98.

 

The two of us were set to do Easter with my grandparents in Tulsa. Mom never got along with them because she wouldn’t walk in the light of God and faith saved my grandpa from cigarettes. The computer said our flight was delayed, which wasn’t a problem until they undid the delay and we were late by being on time. Mom downed two Fruit Roll-Ups and slammed her minivan into an airport lot compact space.

 

We ran in with bags smacking our thighs. Lateness put me on the edge of crying. Sorry to say, I called Mom dumb bitch. When we got to check-in, the guy said my rolling suitcase was too big and I’d have to tag it. Mom said fine. With both arms she tossed the bag at the high counter. It didn’t land the edge, so she tossed it twice.

 

“That’ll just be twenty-one dollars,” the guy said.

 

Mom asked how that was.

 

Spirit had a surcharge for baggage, the guy told us. His hair spiked so sharp it would spear blood if palmed. I’d do anything for him. I was lost from a young age.

 

Just twenty-one,” Mom said.

 

I squeezed her hand.

 

“Fuel costs,” he said.

 

Just twenty-one. Why’d you say just?”

 

He raised his hands. “Just the price.”

 

She lost it and pounded the desk. Just Just Just. Mom informed the man of her marital and financial status and called him a traitor. A traitor to what? An announcement came over the intercom: they were boarding for Tulsa. The bag check guy lifted his neck like he was listening to a dark omen and we should too. I slapped her elbow. “That’s us,” I said. The first time I betrayed her. She bit her lip and handed a card over. Mickey Mouse waving at the stars.

 

Mom didn’t look at me when we loaded on the plane and didn’t help me when I struggled with the seat belt buckle. Once we reached altitude the steward rolled the aisles with drinks. Me, I ordered Sprite, mostly for the ice. I loved the tube kind the planes used. I’d stick my tongue in the cold hole and blow in them and roll them around my teeth. I’ve seen that ice nowhere else. The steward asked Mom’s order. She groaned. “I’ll do the champagne.”

 

“Great,” the steward said. “That’ll just be nineteen dollars.”

 

I checked seats around us for an air marshal.

 

Mom reached for her buckle and unlatched it, then dug her wallet out from her back pocket.

 

“That’s fine, thanks,” she said and handed over her card. He gave her a tiny bottle with a short Styrofoam cup. Whatever you’re thinking, half it.

 

She unwound the wire from its neck, tore the foil top, and dumped the shot of champagne. She drank it for ten minutes. Every sip crackled against her upper lip. She looked at the desert under us, wondering who knows what.

 

Finished, she put the little bottle upside down in the cup. Instead of putting the cup in the pouch in front of her, she stuffed it in her crowded purse. A stewardess came by with a trash bag, and Mom flagged her down. “Hi,” Mom said. “I’m sorry, but I didn’t get a champagne I ordered.”

 

The lady apologized and brought another little bottle. Mom gave her a thumbs up and undid the wire ring and tore the foil. She took out the SkyMall magazine and looked through the magic items. Digital clocks with holograms, inflatable movie screens, an encyclopedia with the whole world on one CD. When she finished her drink, she put the bottle upside down in the cup and clacked it all in her purse.

 

Mom hit the attendant button a few times, and the first steward came back. “Hi,” he said. “Never got that champagne.”

 

“Didn’t I?” The steward looked us over. I had visions of prison yards. Maybe Mom and I would share a cell. He went through his little receipts when the plane jostled, and mom’s purse tipped, knocking a bottle out. The steward looked, but I covered the cup with my tiny feet, like I was stretching out. Growing girl. He shuffled to the back and got her that little champagne. Yes, he did.

 

When mom poured this one, she offered me a sip. The foam sharpened to liquid in my mouth and burned my cheeks so bad, I thought the meat was coming off.

 

“Ma’am, minors can’t have alcohol,” the steward said.

 

“Grand Canyon!” Mom slapped my arm. The majestic gap filled the whole window. Red and brown rock cut away, and we saw miles into the Earth. I tried to imagine what could make something like that. Time, maybe. If you haven’t seen the Grand Canyon, I recommend it. One of nature’s wonders in my opinion.

 

There was just a big article on Spirit. The court ruled against bag charges in a class action lawsuit. “Junk fees,” the Attorney General said, also “exploitative.” Mom never got to read that. I was up for a piece of the settlement because of a shoot I did in Atlanta. The lawyers made me fill out an online form. Eight million they owed us, but the check came in six dollars and twelve cents.

Share