Lost Uncle

Naomi Gordon-Loebl

 

1: Loma Prieta

In 1989, the Loma Prieta earthquake split apart northern California. Sixty-three people died. Thousands more were injured. In Oakland, a stretch of the multi-level Cypress Freeway collapsed, killing some forty-two drivers and passengers who were unfortunate enough to be traveling at the wrong time, their bodies crushed between layers of concrete.

 

Soon after the earthquake, my uncle David called my mom. He told her that he felt a strange satisfaction in those days, walking around the city, among the wreckage, among the terror and the daze that had settled like an uncomfortable blanket over the Bay Area. Everyone else, he said, was finally experiencing what he felt every day.

 

2: Postcard

In June 1987, my mother was visiting her brother David in San Francisco, seven months pregnant with my sister and me. A postcard still survives from that trip, sent to my grandparents at their summer cottage in Maine. “We had a nice day—brunching & then walking in the Berkeley Botanical Gardens,” my mom writes. “Now we’re relaxing & making quiche for tomorrow’s pool party. What a social calendar!”

 

I imagine my mother, never exactly a partier, accompanying her brother to his many engagements. I love David’s handwriting, which I’ve come to recognize from years of examining his diaries and letters. It’s a gorgeous, confident script with a dashed-off feel. His addition to the postcard is briefer. “Am having a good time with J-J,” he writes. “Love + kisses.”

 

What the postcard doesn’t say is that during my mother’s visit, David’s doctor called with the results of his recent bloodwork. He was HIV-positive. My mother tells the story with the narrative distance afforded by thirty years. She cried on the plane in both directions, she always tells me: on the way there because she almost missed her flight and had to sprint, seven months pregnant with twins, through the airport to the gate. On the way back, well—she’s never had to explain that part.

 

3: Paper airplanes

My uncle David was my mother’s only brother. He was blond and handsome, and like me, the kind of gay person who could never pass for straight. When I was a child and he was in his thirties, he lived in San Francisco, in a series of apartments that I visited but can’t remember, except for the last one: a one-bedroom on 17th Street in the Mission, with a bay window into which he had tucked his kitchen table. We sat at that table, my twin sister and me, as five-year-olds, making hundreds of neon green and pink paper airplanes. David had died that spring. The paper airplanes were to pass out at his memorial; he had taught us how to make them on an earlier visit to New York. It is the only memory I have of him, except that I’m not sure whether I actually remember it at all, or whether the image—him in our little bedroom on the top floor of a brownstone in Brooklyn, standing next to my sister’s bed and tossing a paper airplane in front of the window with delight—is an after-market addition to my brain, an imagined scene that syncs conveniently with the story I’ve been told about that day. There is no way I will ever know. I sometimes think I can hear his laugh: a rich, high-pitched sound that dances just beyond the edges of my memory. Ironically, I feel more sure of that one; I am positive, somehow, that it’s accurate. My grandmother says she thinks she has his answering machine tape buried somewhere in storage. I’m desperate to hear it.

 

4: Mary

David and my mother grew up in Washington Heights. Their parents were refugees who had survived Nazi Germany and Austria against all odds. They were immigrants, grateful for their adopted country and eager to build stable lives after years of trauma and upheaval. They gave their children good American names: David and Judy.

 

Like me, David was gender non-conforming from the time he was a toddler. I tried to stand to pee, wanted to be called Jason. David wrapped scarves around his head as a stand-in for long hair and took the name Mary. My grandparents worried he might turn out to be gay. They feared they had done something wrong as parents; they believed, as my grandmother tells me now, that they owed it to their son to care for him in the best way they knew how. They sent David to a psychiatrist, who he saw until he was eighteen years old. When David was accepted to college at Brandeis, the psychiatrist warned against the move. David was at a critical point in his treatment, the psychiatrist said. If he went away from home for college, his progress toward life as a straight man could be lost.

My grandmother fired the psychiatrist. Enough was enough. She sent David to Boston.

 

5: Butch, femme

One of David’s best friends was a lesbian named Andrea. She lived in San Francisco, and she was a frequent visitor during his stay in the hospital in the spring of 1993. On one such visit, David showed Andrea a recent photo of my twin sister Ana and me. We were dressed, as we were in every photo from those days, like a pair of life-sized Ken and Barbie dolls: me in baggy jeans and a baseball cap, Ana in all-pink everything.

 

“Look,” David said to Andrea, pointing to the picture. “Butch and femme.”

 

I did not hear this story until many years after I came out. When I did, my world shifted. It occurred to me that David was almost certainly the first person to name my queerness. But more than that, the story ruptured a narrative that I had carried for a long time: that David and I had never overlapped as queer people in the world; that perhaps the only person in my family with whom I shared this tiny, precious detail of my existence had died unaware. This narrative caused me no small amount of regret, and to some extent, it is still true: David and I were ships in the night. But his ship had seen my floodlight scanning the waters. And his light had flashed welcomingly back.

 

6: PCP

David was on vacation in Argentina in February of 1993 when he came down with a bad cough. He flew back early from his trip, and soon entered the hospital with a diagnosis: pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, or PCP.

 

PCP is a rare lung infection that affects only those with weakened immune systems. Before the development of antiretrovirals, it was the most common opportunistic infection contracted by people with AIDS. David’s case was dire. His doctors had prescribed him a prophylactic regimen of antibiotics—an attempt to prevent what eventually came to pass—and he had maintained it despite a severe allergic reaction to the medication. Thus, the strain of PCP that he eventually contracted was drug-resistant. There were few options.

 

I was raised with the understanding that David was, in a way, lucky. He lived for years after he became HIV-positive. He danced, traveled, worked, and acted in plays—though he did not have another serious partner after his diagnosis. He never suffered from the myriad plagues that famously befell so many people with AIDS in the worst years of the epidemic: the blindness, the dementia, the public markings of Kaposi’s Sarcoma. He was healthy when he left for his vacation in Argentina that winter. Then, six weeks later, he was gone.

 

My mother has told me the story only once. She was visiting him in his hospital room when he began to cough uncontrollably. He coded. Nurses and doctors rushed in and threw my mom out. He survived the episode—an event technically known as acute respiratory failure—but he would never breathe on his own again. He spent the remaining weeks of his life in a medically induced coma, hooked up to a ventilator. On May 24, 1993, weeks after he entered the hospital, my family made the decision to remove life support. He was thirty-seven years old.

 

7: What is an uncle for?

An earlier version of me believed that David would have known everything. The kids who called me “lezzie” in middle school, the girl who broke my heart when I was fourteen, the woman who did it again when I was in my early twenties—I used to fantasize that my fairy-godmother-uncle, having suffered so many of the same wounds, survived so many of the same storms, would have solved it all.

 

It’s a nice fantasy—and David would be far from the first person who, having died, is made to carry in absentia all of the projections of the people he left behind—but a fantasy it is. I no longer entertain the idea that he would have had the perfect words to shepherd me through every difficult passage. He was a human, fallible as me, and I am reminded of that as every year I draw closer to the age that he was when he died. I am thirty-six now and still messy, still figuring out how to return emails in a timely manner, how to tell a friend I am mad at them before my anger bubbles out in the wrong way. What kind of magical thinking would I have to employ to believe that someone like me could save anyone?

 

What is an uncle for? A younger me might have said that an uncle’s purpose is to impart sage advice—to light the way, to offer what he’s learned from his experience traveling the same uncertain terrain you find yourself stumbling along. I’m less illusioned now. An uncle might be there to offer wisdom, the very rare kind that transforms the way you look at the world. Or he might be there to wax on with what he thinks is brilliant guidance, but which is barely relevant to your life. He might be there to draw comparisons that feel inaccurate, to tell you exactly the wrong thing, or even just to shrug and say, in a way that leaves you feeling dissatisfied and alone, that he doesn’t know. David might have been any of these uncles—or, most likely, some combination of them.

 

These days, rather than speculating about the lessons he might have shared with me, I find myself thinking about my uncle’s pain. Perhaps this shift toward empathy is natural. Soon I will be older than David ever was. I broke up with a girlfriend last year. It’s been a slow-moving rupture, the kind that aches for longer than you think it should. I don’t know how David coped when his last relationship ended; how much he cried, how many letters he wrote and didn’t send, how long before he felt better. Most of it I’ll probably never find out.

 

8: Lost uncles

For a long time, I worried that if David had survived, we might not have gotten along. What if he had driven me crazy? What if we had argued about gay assimilation every time I visited him in San Francisco? He might have left comments on my Instagram posts that made me cringe. Maybe I would’ve come home from every visit full of frustration.

 

“My uncle David,” I might have sighed to a friend over beers, back in Brooklyn. “We are just so different.”

 

Even so: I can’t shake the feeling that we would have learned something from each other too. Narratives of the early years of the AIDS epidemic often mourn the tremendous loss of talent: the dancers, composers, painters, actors, curators, and writers whose contributions were far from finished, their oeuvres forever incomplete. I wonder about all of the lost uncles, every queer friend of mine who, when they have heard about David, has leaned across the table and told me their story. What if every queer person my age had grown up with their Uncle David? What would we have learned from them? What would they have learned from us?

 

And with that continuity, so seismically disrupted—what would we have built?

 

9: Memorial

Last year, as a Christmas present, my younger brother Sean digitized our family’s home videos. Among the contents of the old cardboard box he sent off, reinforced with extra layers of packing tape, was a VHS tape which was familiar to me from the nearly three decades it spent sitting on a shelf in my parents’ living room, but which I had never watched. The label on its spine, written with Sharpie in my father’s capital letters, read: DAVID’S MEMORIAL.

 

Sean sent me a link in January. Even in its new digital form, the video has all the hallmarks of old home movies: fuzzy, unfocused images; distorted sound; dated outfits. It also has, as is often the case with pre-smartphone home movies, some attempt at narrative structure. The unknown person behind the camera takes pains to document the scenery of the memorial: a large room filled with arched windows, metal folding chairs, and bunches of rainbow balloons. Side tables are piled with food: mountains of bagels, platters of lox and sliced red onions, a carrot cake decorated with dozens of little carrots repeating across its rectangular surface, each of them finished with a tiny, iced green top. The videographer pans slowly across these tables, and the photo albums laid across them too, zooming in on some pictures that are so familiar to me that I could describe from memory the flowers that appear in the background, and others that I do not think I have ever seen before.

 

The program is not overly long, and in a way, it is unremarkable. A memorial service for a thirty-seven-year-old man is by definition unnatural: in the late twentieth century, thirty-something-year-olds with full heads of hair and lungs that could power them up Italian mountains on long-distance bike tours were not supposed to die. But as I watched the camera scan the room at David’s memorial, revealing dozens of good-looking young men in ties and jackets, I couldn’t help but think about how absolutely normalized this event was in San Francisco in 1993—how many parties with carrot cake and rainbow balloons these men would have attended by this point, how many guest books they would have signed, how many times they would have shrugged on those well-fitting suit jackets. Perhaps that’s why they smile as they greet each other; why they know how to dance when the music begins, an activity that strikes me as totally surreal for a memorial, even though I understand its rationale: this is a celebration of David’s life, and David loved to dance. As Robert, David’s best friend, says in his opening remarks: “This, I’d say, is certainly David’s largest party ever, and you know how he loved a party…although I think he’d probably be at the beach on a day like this.”

 

I appear in the video almost from the very beginning: a short-haired five-year-old wearing colorful shorts and a Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles T-shirt. My immediate family is seated in the front row, and for some reason, I have chosen a seat by myself, across the aisle. I sit on the metal folding chair; my legs, too short to reach the ground, dangle in the air. The videographer, as though anticipating my specific interest in this video almost thirty years later, zooms in until only my face is framed in the shot. I do not look sad—which makes sense. What does a child who sees her uncle twice annually understand about death, about his forever-disappearance from a world she has only known for five years? I do, however, look alert. And in my hand, I hold the handle of a large white paper shopping bag. It spans the entire length of my bare shins. In a half hour, after the eulogies end, my mother will take the microphone to explain that my sister and I will be giving out paper airplanes in memory of our Uncle David. We walk past and through the hordes of tall adults, who at this point stand and stretch, preparing themselves for food, for dancing, or to say hello to the person they have not seen in a year. Our high voices punctuate the sounds of the crowd. “Did you get one?” we say. People seem to be humoring us, calling our names in request, and the camera follows me as I turn in every direction, reaching into the bag, handing out the airplanes two at a time, a sense of purpose and pleasure on my face. A red AIDS ribbon—one of the first symbols I can ever remember recognizing as a child—is pinned to my chest. In the next shot, David’s friend Frank stands and buttons his jacket, smiling. In the background, our airplanes fly through the air, their flights brief and sharp. People are throwing them.

 

In her eulogy, read aloud by a friend—another mother who lost her son to AIDS—my grandmother says David believed that people had “an essence from birth to death.” Of course my uncle knew who I was, I think, watching this younger but not-so-different version of myself stride around the room, the white paper bag hanging from my little fist. In the video’s last frames, the mourners dance to an upbeat, unidentifiable nineties tune while in the background, a home movie of David as a toddler, dressed in white and dancing with my mother, plays on a television screen.

 

10: Bedtime stories

My uncle David kept diaries. Slim, flexible notebooks with faded clothbound covers: one striped blue and white and dotted with tiny red roses, another covered in an abstract floral pattern in tan and green. My grandmother kept these notebooks after he died, and they lived on the towering mid-century bookcases in the foyer of my grandparents’ apartment, next to the photo albums filled with black-and-white pictures of David as a boy. It didn’t occur to me until I asked my mother about it that this might have been an invasion of David’s privacy, that maybe David would have been horrified to know that his mother had held onto his diaries like they were souvenirs from his bar mitzvah. My mom had made her peace with this fact—David was gone, she said, not here to feel violated or embarrassed, and how could she begrudge my grandmother any physical trace of her son that remained in the world—but she had never read them, and she would not.

 

Though I believed my mother’s ethical assessment to be the correct one, my desperation to know David outweighed my ability to self-regulate. From the time I was a teenager, I spent hours poring over the diaries in my grandparents’ apartment. I was enthralled by the person whose unfiltered voice spun across the pages in faded ink. Who was this man? The one who loved to eat and to travel, who detailed every dish he ate on vacation with impressive diligence, noting those that were “just okay” and those that were “delish,” whose ability to find dance floors and meet strangers wherever he went I found myself admiring, decades later. David spread out before me, opinionated, annoyed, delighted, alive. At the same time, as I suspect anyone who has tried to meet a person through their private writings can attest, in some ways he remained as opaque as ever. The notebooks were in my hands, but they might as well have been behind museum glass, flat objects that would never reveal more than the text on their surfaces, no matter how much I squinted. They were like pre-recorded bedtime stories, played long after the narrator has left the building. What if I had a question? And I had so many questions.

 

The temptation here becomes great, irresistible, even—how can I write about these notebooks, full of travel spats with friends and the occasional hand job, without showing their contents? My mission all these years has been to know this person whom I cannot ever know, and here, finally, an opening: David, in his own words. It seems almost unfair to talk about the notebooks without sharing them, and for this reason, I have tried out every possible justification for quoting from them here. There is the nihilistic: he’s dead, he has no consciousness, he no longer exists to experience the humiliation and indignation of having his most private thoughts published and read by strangers. Then, on the exact opposite end of the spectrum, there is the mental gymnastics: he loved attention, craved the spotlight, and would’ve enjoyed having his words made celebrity, the mundane details of his life a source of interest for so many strangers.

 

I want to find these arguments convincing, and for brief moments, in conversation with friends or late at night at my desk, I can talk myself into accepting them. But before I get to the point where I transfer my uncle’s intimate thoughts from his pages to my own, an inconvenient feeling crowbars its way in. Sometimes it is thinking about facing my mother and telling her that I published her brother’s diaries—the ones she refused to read. Sometimes it is a physical feeling, the one you get when you receive a clear directive from your internal compass, then resolutely face the opposite direction and march ahead. And sometimes it is a simple realization: to publish my uncle’s diaries would be to sacrifice the privacy of a person who died young, who was robbed of longevity, and who is not here to defend himself. Perhaps David would have happily signed off on it; perhaps he would have made the same choice, if he were here to make it. But he is not here, and I cannot stomach taking advantage of his inability to object.

 

What I can do, though, is tell this story.

 

One day, visiting my grandparents’ apartment, I pulled David’s diaries from their home on the shelf, flipping absentmindedly through the notebooks as my grandmother finished a phone call in her study. A small, folded piece of paper fluttered from the pages, landing on the rug at my feet. I picked it up. It was a music request sheet from a party—a three-by-five-inch form that a partygoer might fill out and return to the DJ, requesting that they play a particular song. Instructions at the top identified the “mixtress” as Page Hodel, a legendary lesbian Bay Area DJ the Chronicle once called “San Francisco’s unofficial Pied Piper of Party.” The form was blank, unused—but on the back, someone had written something: a man’s name, address, and phone number, followed by a note: “When you don’t have to get up at 7 AM or whenever.”

 

In all my years of studying these notebooks, how had I never encountered this object? I punched the address into my phone and was disappointed but unsurprised to see that the map and an accompanying image of the street revealed only a nondescript apartment building about four stories high. Still, I squinted, looking back and forth between the fuzzy picture and the note in my hand. Someone had given David this exact slip of paper, the one I now held, and he had tucked it between the pages of this diary all those years ago. What had transpired with this person? Did they go home together to this tan brick building on Market Street? Did the man pass him the note on the dance floor—or at seven in the morning as David left for his job as a salesman at AT&T? I briefly considered calling the phone number, but of course I wouldn’t—that would be insane—and it almost certainly didn’t belong to the man anymore, the man who might very well be someone else’s long-gone uncle.

 

11: Fear of motion

I never knew this person. Why am I chasing him?

 

My mother reminds me that there is a natural human desire to know where we come from; to see our forebears; to search for our own thick eyebrows in theirs, the distinctive shapes of our noses, an unmistakable gait or familiar settling of the jowls. The recognition of ourselves in an ancestor offers both proof of our own existence and a logic for understanding it. You came from somewhere—you are not a lab experiment dropped out of space onto planet Earth, unmoored and without a history, but rather a link in a sequence, with a past that confirms your present. Someone came before you. And perhaps this someone with their crooked teeth, their widow’s peak—perhaps their existence explains yours in some way, provides a key with which to read your own map. “Then I think about my fear of motion,” the Indigo Girls sing, “which I never could explain / some other fool across the ocean years ago must have crashed his little airplane.”

 

Queer people my age were born into a unique kind of fortune. Our predecessors belonged to the first generation in which LGBTQ young adults came out en masse. Our aunts, uncles, and godparents grew up in the era of that famous and succinct Gay Liberation slogan, “Come out!” Many of them did; many of us grew up in families where someone was already out, already queer, had already named the thing before we were old enough to know it had a name. We were born, in other words, with the chance to see ourselves in our own families. Or tantalizingly close, anyway.

 

Is it any wonder I’m still seeking the airplane-crasher?

 

12: Debt

There is something else, too. My mother told me that David never had another boyfriend after his diagnosis—no one serious, anyway. She was quick to clarify that it wasn’t because of HIV, or at least, not because of the stigma. “I just don’t think he was in the right place emotionally to be in a relationship,” she explained.

I am younger than David when he died—barely. He did things I’ve never done: he moved across the country, traveled through Europe, went to business school. Some of them were not so happy: looking statistics in the face, he took out an expensive life insurance policy, a practical bounty on his head with my siblings and me listed as benefactors. The resulting inheritance paid for my college tuition.

 

I’m well aware, though, of the things I’ve done or might do that David won’t. I have the privilege of a relatively healthy body, for today. If I’m lucky, I’ll have children; if I’m lucky, I’ll turn 50; if I’m lucky, someday I’ll be the old person at the club, dancing even though I don’t know the song. Of course, none of us knows what will happen; all of this could change tomorrow. But for now, I live with the monumental fortune of being able to see my future. I don’t walk around like yesterday was an earthquake, and tomorrow could come another, and with it, the end of my existence. I do not live in fear.

 

I don’t know how to explain that I feel I have inherited an enormous debt, and maybe, also, a gift. When I dance for hours next to strangers and their pungent sweat; when I kiss a woman underneath a hundred gaudy rainbow ceiling ornaments in a West Village gay bar; when I lie on the beach for a deliciously long time and know I should put on sunscreen but can’t bring myself to reach for my bag. I know, logically, that these moments are not a gift from David, that he did not die so I could have them. But I feel, nonetheless, the achy weight of experiencing them in his stead. He no longer can, so I must. I owe it to him.

 

13: Cherries

My mother always tells me about how when he was little, David saved the cherries in his ice cream. He would collect them in his bowl, she says, waiting to eat them as the last part of his dessert. Sometimes, right as he got to the end, right as he was about to savor the cherries he had stockpiled, my grandfather would steal his bowl, teasing him. David never failed to get upset. It was cruel of my grandfather to play with him that way, my mom says. But sometimes she’ll also tell me that he was teaching David a lesson, and maybe not a bad one. Don’t be miserly with joy, I imagine that lesson to be. Don’t wait for a more perfect time to take pleasure in what you have.

 

I think about David and his cherries sometimes when I open my drawer, see that my favorite T-shirt is clean, and am tempted to save it for a different day. When I feel, for some reason, that I should wait and wear some other, lesser T-shirt. For what? I wear the shirt. It’ll fall to pieces whether or not I do.

 

14: Provincetown, one

One summer in my late twenties, my then-girlfriend and I decided to go on vacation to Provincetown.

 

Like many queer neighborhoods and towns, Provincetown was an artists’ community before it became known as a haven for gay people—my straight grandparents on my father’s side actually honeymooned there in 1949—but for decades now, it has been the closest thing in the United States to an official gay vacation town, replete with all the trappings of both gayborhoods and American beach destinations. In the summer, every coffee shop, art gallery, restaurant, and beach towel is filled with gay people (alongside a growing minority of straight tourists including, disturbingly, bachelorette parties).

 

My vacation with my girlfriend was far from my first time in Provincetown. As a child, I spent summers visiting Wellfleet, ten miles down the Cape. We took frequent day trips to Provincetown, eating pizza at Spiritus and free fudge samples at the penny candy store, reveling in the playfulness that, even as kids, we could feel in the air from the moment we biked onto the main drag. It was a beloved, magical place for me, and as an adult, I’ve wondered why. Are all children predisposed to love towns with weekly drag parades? (Maybe; after all, restrictive gender roles harm everyone, and children are perhaps more attuned to the pleasure of rejecting them than adults with many more years of repression under their belts.) I suspect, though, that I felt an instinctive safety there. I was always a gender-nonconforming child, always the source of visible confusion and the subject of barely whispered questions, always acutely aware that others saw me as strange from the time I was very, very small. My parents had many lesbian friends, women with strong muscles and handsome buzzcuts and impressive baseball skills, and I always felt drawn to them, even if I could not say why. Provincetown had the same inexplicable hearth-like quality. Something in me vibrated when I was there.

 

But visiting as an out queer adult was different—and as we drove into town on Route 6, the familiar bay-facing cottages coming into view, I thought for neither the first nor the last time about the fact that this was something David had done too. There is only one road onto the Cape. This row of little houses, the sun just beginning to threaten its descent behind them, would have greeted him on arrival, just as it greeted me.

 

David went to college in Boston and stayed in the city for several years after graduation. It was from there that he began to make the three-hour trek to Provincetown, on weekends and eventually for entire summers, which he funded by working in exchange for lodging. My mother still has his satin varsity jacket from the Boatslip, the raucous hotel and bar where he worked as a pool boy. The jacket is burgundy with white trim, an almost confusingly fancy staff uniform. My mom wears it occasionally on spring nights out on the town.

 

The Boatslip is still in operation, and every afternoon during the summer, it hosts Provincetown’s biggest party—the tea dance. If you happen to be outside at 4 PM, you witness its pull: on seemingly every block of town, a steady tide of people wanders toward 161 Commercial Street, settling in for three hours of boozy rum punches and dancing on the Boatslip’s deck overlooking the bay. The festivities end promptly at 7 PM, and the same ritual repeats in reverse, if more slowly: tipsy partiers in slim chino shorts and glittery drag costumes lollygag down the middle of Commercial Street, making the already-barely-car-friendly road just about impassable. They eat pizza at Spiritus, they go home to nap, they sit down for pasta at Ciro and Sal’s. Some of them will surface hours later at the A-House—a 200-year-old bar that’s sometimes described as the oldest gay bar in the United States.

 

This is a different Provincetown from the one I visited as a child. The proliferation of straight tourists and bachelorette parties aside, I never went to bars, drank cocktails, danced sweaty against any bare-torsoed men I didn’t know. On the first afternoon of our vacation, we went to the tea dance. It was an overcast day, and we were too early; we were new to this and didn’t realize that our 4:15 PM arrival was akin to a 9 PM appearance at a club. We ordered rum punches, and the bartender finished them off with extra glugs of Bacardi 151 down the straw. The line not yet clogged behind me, I told him my uncle once worked at this bar many years ago.

 

“Oh, have you looked for him in the staff pictures?” he asked me. “There’s one for every year inside.”

 

We ducked into the empty indoor bar to look. Some part of me had convinced myself that David’s employment at this exact establishment was a dream, that any proof that he had stood here would be purely in the form of stories I’d heard, not physical artifacts to be touched, held, or clung to. But there, hung along the stairwell leading to the bar’s hotel rooms, were framed group photos of the Boatslip staff, each neatly labeled with a year. I climbed the steps slowly, studying the pictures. In each, a crowd of some dozen men smile at the camera. They are handsome, young, fit. They wear staff T-shirts, some years burgundy, others pink. They ham it up for the camera, make goofy faces, lean on each other’s shoulders and sit at each other’s feet. As the photos get older—1993, 1992, 1991—the haircuts look more and more vintage, the clothing styles—tall white gym socks, tucked-in T-shirts with rolled sleeves—more and more resembling the photos I’ve seen of David. Many of these men are probably dead.

 

1983, 1982, 1981, 1980, then…nothing. I found myself at the top of the stairs, facing the hotel’s little reception window and a door labeled OFFICE. I looked at the hallway’s bare walls, a little frantic—did the photos continue in some unseen location? Was the rest of the display hung elsewhere? No, said the man in the reception window, wearing a blue Boatslip T-shirt. There might be older photos somewhere, he said, but he really couldn’t say. If they existed, they were probably in storage.

 

He didn’t offer to investigate further, and I didn’t ask. How could I justify such a request? I knew David worked here. My mother had the jacket to prove it, even if it was nowhere to be seen in these pictures. What more could I be seeking from a single group photo, one in which the total real estate taken up by my uncle’s face would have been smaller than the pad of my index finger? And perhaps it didn’t even exist; perhaps they hadn’t taken a photo that year, a negligent manager or grumpy staff. Perhaps it existed, and David wasn’t in it—he had been sick, maybe, or away on an overnight to Boston. I could not ask for an archival hunt for such a photo.

 

Why, though, did the absence feel so devastating?

 

I realized, back on the bar’s deck and feeling the rum punch’s depressive undertow, that I had allowed myself to anticipate something new—an addition to the static archive that I had assembled of David’s life. There had been no new stories about him for a long time; no new photos; no new facts to sit with, to run through my head during long train rides or jogs in the park. There were only the stories I asked my mother to tell me again and again, hoping that some heretofore untold detail might surface; the photos that I reexamined, searching the background for clues I hadn’t noticed before. When a person exits our physical world, so does the possibility of a new encounter with them. What we have is what we have; there is a bottom, and you can see it.

 

The staff picture was a trapdoor—a tiny, new piece of David to be discovered in a world he is long gone from. I longed to come face-to-face with him here; if a photo was my best chance, I would have taken it.

 

15: Yom Kippur eve

I call my grandmother and ask her if I can stop by to borrow David’s old journals; I need to check some facts, I say, make sure I’ve gotten the chronology right. She’s thrilled that I’ve asked. Of course, she says, she’ll have them ready for me when I come. A few days later, she tells me she’s putting together a collection of materials for me, stuff I’ve never seen. She thinks it’ll be useful for my work.

 

If I’m honest, I’m skeptical. Haven’t I spent decades of my life picking through every artifact of David that lives in their apartment? The photos, the old T-shirts, the childhood drawings, the elementary school report cards. The programs from the plays he acted in; the programs from his memorial; the photocopies of his obituary, Xeroxes of Xeroxes on which his face has been reduced to a collection of shadows, my grandmother’s familiar handwriting crawling in blue ink—“Bay Area Reporter”—across the top of the page.

 

But my grandmother has the best memory in our family, and she is always surprising us. I go with an open mind, and at the end of our visit, as I am leaving their apartment, she proudly instructs my grandfather to hand me the tote bag that she has hung by the door. The bag is stuffed with loose papers of different sizes and thicknesses, envelopes, folders, cards. I check to make sure the journals are there, then drop the bag into my backpack and buckle it closed.

 

Back home, I sit on my couch and pull papers from the bag, spreading them across the coffee table. My grandmother is right; I haven’t seen any of this before. The bulk of the contents turn out to be condolence cards that my grandparents received after David’s death. Some are long, and the words, despite the authors’ insistence that none could be adequate, strike me in their empathy. “I grope to say something, anything that could relieve some of your pain and suffering,” one person writes. “We press very close to you with all our sympathy and with love.” Others are far briefer; some writers, in a move that scandalizes me, have only signed their names beneath the greeting card’s preprinted message of sympathy. All of the condolences have been marked with a short notation in my grandfather’s neat European script, a detail that escapes my notice until I realize that it appears uniformly on each of them. “Answered,” he has written at the top of every card, followed by a date.

 

I finish the stack of cards and am about to turn my attention to the journals when I notice a five-by-eight spiral-bound notebook with a plain cardboard cover, a notebook I’m sure I haven’t seen before. I open it. The first page bears a centered inscription, written in the elegant letters that have become familiar to me: “Purchased Greenwich Village, NY. 10/12/86. Yom Kippur eve.”

 

Ah, I think. Maybe this was a notebook, like so many of my own, bought with lofty intentions of diligent daily journaling and never used. Maybe that’s why I’ve never seen it.

 

But I flip the page, and the first lines shock:

 

     6/12 started Septra

 

     6/13 headache in AM took aspirin

 

     6/14 headache took aspirin 2 doses

 

     6/  started AZT

 

Among the many records of David’s life in his journals—his birthday lists, his travel stories, his New Year’s resolutions, his records of every dollar spent, every cocktail enjoyed—there is no mention of AIDS. The conspicuity of this omission becomes more and more apparent as I repeat the revelation to myself, which is somehow only occurring to me now, scanning this meticulous documentation of headaches and pills. No mention among the accounts of arguments with friends and lists of concerts. No mention among the recounting of flights and ferries, among the favorite movies and musicals enumerated. How could I have been so naive as not to notice—not to see the glaring absence, the obvious missing shadow of that phone call from his doctor’s office in June 1987, and all that followed it? Here, finally, they had surfaced: the missing pages.

 

16: Was he brave?

“Nana,” I ask my grandmother. “Will you tell me the story about David getting bullied on the train platform?”

 

She laughs.

 

“Well,” she says, never one to turn down the chance to tell a story. “You mean when those little boys held him up?”

 

She tells me again, every detail. How she and David had been riding the subway home together in the evening, and how he said he wanted to get off early to buy a book. How she didn’t think twice about it—he was just twelve, but he already rode the subway to school by himself every day. How she gave him ten dollars, and how an hour later, a police officer called to tell her that he had her son. The officer said that he was going uptown and could drop David off, but my grandmother said she would collect him herself. She did, and on the way home, he told her how two little boys had tried to take his money.

 

(Little boys, my grandmother calls them, and here I remember that this is always part of the telling: how young all three boys were, how ridiculous the idea of little boys mugging each other.)

 

He’d refused to give them the ten dollars, and they’d argued with him all the way into the train station, where they passed the better part of an hour threatening him with a tiny penknife until he cried, and then pretending to comfort him whenever strangers walked by. All the while, he remained steadfast in his unwillingness to give up his money. Finally, a police officer happened upon them and intervened. He brought all three boys back to the station and summoned their mothers to retrieve them.

 

“I admire him for it,” my grandmother says at one point, using the present tense to describe his refusal to give in. I press her.

 

“Do you think he was brave?” I ask. “I mean, wasn’t that brave of him?” I am testing a thesis now. It is about David, but it is also about me—about the boys who stole my school pictures in middle school and scrawled epithets on them before taping them up in the hallways; about the girls who surrounded me in the schoolyard and told me I looked like a monkey to a chorus of laughter. I would have been exactly the age David was as he stood on the subway platform, fingers closed around the bills in his pocket as the trains came and left, came and left. Haven’t they made us tougher, all the little boys who held us up with tiny penknives? Aren’t we braver for our trials on the subway platforms, even if we cried, even if we grew desperate as the hour wore on and it seemed no one was coming to help?

 

“I don’t know if he was brave,” my grandmother says. She never gives me easy answers, for which I am grateful. “I think what’s shocking is that no one stopped—in that whole hour, all those adults, walking back and forth, and nobody noticed what was happening with those little boys.” She shakes her head, and we are quiet.

“I miss him so much,” she says, shaking her head. “Still. Such a schnookiepuss.”

 

Schnookiepuss. A word I grew up with; a word we loved to hear from our grandparents. If we were flowers, we would’ve bent toward the sound every time it fell from their lips. If I had to define it, it’d be this: a schnookiepuss is someone who is lovable. Except it’s not an abstract kind of lovability. A schnookiepuss is a particular someone who you just love so much.

 

I think then about what I know of David’s last trip to Argentina, right before he died. How at a McDonald’s, he followed a man who had cruised him into a bathroom and dropped his pants for a blowjob. The man flashed a knife and took all of the cash he had. His friends, telling me the story twenty-five years later at a dinner party in San Francisco, laugh. It’s a story of a hookup gone wrong, and from the way they describe him when he came out of the bathroom, it doesn’t sound like he was brave. I think they use the word hysterical. I would’ve been hysterical too.

 

So, maybe not brave. Stubborn? And determined; if he was hysterical, he didn’t let it get in his way. The bathroom holdup was not the event that sent him on an early plane back to New York, and I feel reasonably certain that if he had lived, he would have kept on cruising. I think about the child on the train platform, surrounded, and the thirty-seven-year-old flying home to die. My grandmother: nobody noticed what was happening with those little boys. A bathroom, a penknife, an earthquake, a virus. So many passersby. Sometimes I feel so angry.

 

17: Provincetown, two

Toward the end of my week in Provincetown, the Boatslip hosted Solid Gold—their twice-weekly party paying homage to the eighties television show of the same name. Madonna, Whitney Houston, Cyndi Lauper, and Prince floated across the open-air dance floor. An overcast day, the sky striated and gray behind the bare masts of sailboats sitting low in the bay, but who would complain? Even though it was Thursday, the bar was full, and all around us, men in tank tops and one middle-aged lesbian bachelorette party—having, I noted, perhaps the best time of anyone in a sea of good times—jumped euphorically with, or more or less near, the beat. When the familiar opening notes of “It’s Raining Men” rolled from the speakers, a collective cheer spread through the crowd, and at the chorus, every person sang along, their feet stomping on the bar’s old wooden floorboards with synchronized thuds that almost drowned out the song’s percussion track. “It’s raining men,” we all shouted, “amen,” and the air itself seemed to vibrate with pleasure.

 

Then the next song began: a quintessential eighties beat, a synth melody, and an unmistakable voice. “Ooh yeah,” Whitney Houston riffed, as “I Wanna Dance with Somebody” played.

 

“I Wanna Dance with Somebody” came out in 1987, the year I was born and the year David was diagnosed with HIV. It’s a song that has always buzzed somewhere underneath my ribcage; a resonance I attribute to the fact that, like so many ostensibly straight songs adopted by queer people as anthems, the song manages to express something profound about queer longing.

 

The pain of the gap between what we have and what we want is at the heart of “I Wanna Dance With Somebody.” Yet, it’s not a sad song. Whitney makes the choice to believe in desire, even when the deck feels stacked against her—even when desire might bring her pain. It’s a choice she has to make if she’s going to survive. The song is melancholy, but it’s not cynical. It’s not a mourner’s lament. It’s a manifesto, a celebration.

 

Most of the time, for me, the gulf between the living and the dead feels vast and uncrossable. Very rarely, though, things line up. The physical landscape, the one that keeps the records as we humans change shifts, offers up the memories it’s been holding safe in its files. A bar plays the same song they played thirty years ago. They serve the same potent rum punches they’ve been serving for thirty years. Dancers’ feet stamp out rhythms on old floorboards that have seen the same rhythms before. The sun sets pink and orange over the boats in the bay, just as it’s always done. The only thing that’s changed is the year on the calendar, and for an instant, I feel like all that separates me from someone who died decades ago is a sliver of time and space, a gap no larger than the one between the sun’s last flash on the horizon and the moment it dips out of sight.

 

18: David

How has it taken me until now to realize? In Hebrew, the name means beloved.

 

19: To make sense

Contrary to my speculation that perhaps David’s Yom Kippur notebook would turn out to be an empty one, every page is filled. It reads, today, a bit like the notes of a person who has spent a weekend falling down an Internet rabbit hole of everything that was known in 1987 about AIDS. It includes documentation of symptoms, questions for doctor’s visits, notes from doctor’s visits, book recommendations. Lists of drugs, mini-lessons in virology, references to studies and legislation. Names, phone numbers, addresses, organizations. Dates. It is detailed, comprehensive, at turns both erratic and thorough. It has an unmistakably frantic tone. It is almost unbearably painful to read.

 

These pages, I realize, date from the same time as all of those vacation diaries. He would have sat on that plane to Brussels, the one whose ticket is still tucked into his journal, with two notebooks on his tray table: the one in which he carefully documented the flight, how much he slept, the museums he was looking forward to visiting, and this one: the one in which he kept track of questions he wanted to ask his doctor, raised spots on his skin, phone numbers for support groups. I am tempted to tell a story about this divide. Was he compartmentalizing? Was this how he maintained his sanity—walling off the fear from the joy? The separation is so complete that it is hard to imagine it is an accident. But, what do I know about how David lived? What do I know about the air aboard that plane? I’m an amateur detective, like a child with a polyester Sherlock Holmes hat and a giant magnifying glass, its plastic lens cloudy and scratched. I’m fishing, and if I stumble upon the truth in the process, I won’t even know it. There’s no one to tell me I’ve gotten this right.

 

I turn the pages and pause at each one, turning each phrase in David’s handwriting over in my head—pentamidine, acyclovir—as though, if I concentrate, any one of these words could be a portal to the past. Simonton Getting Well Again (visualization). As though, if I find out what books he was reading, maybe I’ll be transported back to that apartment on 17th Street. AIDS + ARC, amantadine, rimantadine, HPA23. As though, if I squint hard enough at his words, maybe I’ll finally see him at his kitchen table, on the bus, in the doctor’s waiting room. Trying to make sense of something no one has made sense of yet; trying to figure out how to live.

 

I make my way through the entire notebook, writing down terms and bullet points as I go. Retrovirus RNA->DNA->RNA sends me back to the unit on HIV in middle school biology, a class I took six years after David’s death and, to this day, the only time I have ever gotten a good grade in science. Ribavirin, azidothymidine AZT, and I think about my grandmother telling me how David, weakened by antivirals, struggled to lift their suitcases into the overhead compartments when they took a plane together to Hawaii. Dideoxycytidine TOXIC. Naltrexone immunostimulating NY study. Peptide T? Candace Pert, Salk vaccine encouraging. FDA testing Van de Kamp, Agnos not passed, Doolittle killed, Theresa Crenshaw, Randy Shilts’ book this month The Band Played On. 20% infected in ’82-83 are stable. Pentamidine inhalation prophylaxis/Septra, why not try it. On, and on, and on.

 

A photo is tucked about three-quarters of the way through the notebook, on a page that begins with a list in green marker: medical, chg pent appt, Conant appt, East Bay recom. It is me as a toddler, stepping confidently forward on the cracked sidewalk in front of my Brooklyn home while my mother, laughing as she looks into the camera, stoops to reach for my hand. The trees are bare, but it is a sunny day. The photo gleams with happiness.

 

I try to remind myself that the chances are good that my grandmother absentmindedly stowed this photo in these pages years after David died. But the type on the back of the picture announces that it was printed by a photo lab in February 1989. It is possible, I decide, that he placed it here.

 


 

“Lost Uncle” originally appeared in The Florida Review vol. 48.1, Fall 2024, available for purchase here.

Share

101 Steps to Becoming an American

I.

1. Wake up at four in the morning. Your bags are waiting for you, and your grandma and uncle are getting the car ready. The ride to the Caracas International Airport will take several hours, and the flight from Caracas to Atlanta will take eight.

 

2. Six months prior, your mother left for the U.S. You knew she moved there permanently, but this didn’t bother you. Your house was big; your family was big; you had lots of friends, lots of toys, lots of everything. You’d visit her in America, but only visit. Then you’d return home, where you belonged.

 

3. Every year prior, as the midnight clock crossed from December 31st to January 1st, your mother scurried across the street with you in one hand and a small suitcase in the other.

 

4. Things were not so bad yet. There were rumors of a rigged election. Rumors of plans for a rewriting of the Constitution for extended presidential terms. Rumors. Protest. Peaceful protests. Marches with everyone wearing flag shirts, flag hats, flag face paint. For the Republic. For democracy. But things were not so bad.

 

5. Citizenship offers many benefits and equally important responsibilities. When you naturalize, you agree to accept all of the responsibilities of becoming a U.S. citizen. You agree to support the United States, its Constitution, and its laws. In return, you gain all the rights and privileges of citizenship such as the right to vote and travel with a U.S. passport.

 

6. During your naturalization interview, a U.S. Citizenship and Immigration officer will ask you questions about your application and background. You will also take an English and civics test.

 

7. American Government: What is the supreme law of the land? The Constitution. What does the Constitution do? The Constitution sets up the government, defines the government, and protects the basic rights of Americans.

 

8. Board your first airplane.

 

9. Get excited. Look out the window and see the airport shrinking, the city coming into full view, clouds passing, and your home fading into a map—like the ones in geography class.

 

10. You will have a layover in Atlanta, but you will arrive in Salt Lake City at approximately 3 p.m. the next afternoon.

 

11. Use the only English you know to tell your name to the flight attendants. Try first-class food. Watch the newest movie. Try third-class food. Puke. Learn how to say “Where ees de bathroom?” Try Rice Krispies Treats for the first time.

 

12. Be excited. This is your first flight, your first time traveling outside the country, and your first time visiting Mom.

 

13. American History: What is one reason colonists came to America? Freedom. Political liberty. Religious freedom. Economic opportunity. To practice their religion. To escape persecution.

 

14. Geography: What ocean is on the East Coast of the United States? The Atlantic Ocean.

 

II.

15. Circle back to English class. All you can remember is “Cat,” “Dog,” “My nem ees…” You’re going to need all of it.

 

16. Things are not so different here. There are buildings and houses. Gas stations. People. But it is different, though you can’t put your finger on it. The air is unfamiliar. You feel like a little fish in a big ocean, far from the lake in which you grew up.

 

17. Unpack your bags, go explore, eat your first BLT. Your first burrito. Your first American cheeseburger. It won’t have ham, or fries, or three different cheeses, or garlic sauce, but it’s still good.

 

18. Experience snow.

 

19. Discover ChapStick: have your life changed forever.

 

20. Change is what everyone craves when they say they want to travel. Change. The only unchangeable force in the universe. Too little change and life gets stale like bread; too much change too often, and change can get unnerving like a roller coaster. Just the right amount can make one distracted.

 

21. Sign up for school. It’s okay, you’ll only be here for a year or two with Mom. Then you’ll go home. Then you’ll have plenty of stories to tell everyone.

 

22. Repeat 5th grade. It’s because of your birthday. You will now be a year behind all of your friends when you go home. Two years, in fact, since school goes until 11th grade there. But you’ll do great. In fact, you’ll learn English faster than the other English Language Learners at your school because you’re so addicted to trading card games, and all of the cards here are printed in English.

 

23. The food will be weird. But what it lacks in seasoning it will make up for in cheese. You will be fine.

 

24. “Poh-taah-toe-eh.”

 

25. No, no, it’s, ‘Poe-tay-toe.’

 

26. “That’s what I said.”

 

27. “Thegypshingocars.” “Thegypshangotcars.” “Thegyptiangodcards.” “The Egyptian God Cards.”

 

28. “Yes, teacher. I will come to your house Sunday.” Wait, what? “I will come to your house Sunday, right?” Oh! You will come to my house someday. I get it. But, no, don’t do that.

 

29. Naturalize: To establish a plant or animal so that it lives wild in a region where it is not indigenous. To alter an adopted foreign word so that it conforms more closely to the phonology or orthography of the adopting language. To regard as or to cause to appear natural. To admit a foreigner to the citizenship of a country.

 

30. Scratch your head over and over and over again. Here, almost no one knows anything about where you’re from. Most cannot place it on a map. Most will mistake you for being from Mexico. The Middle East. Samoa.

 

31. “You’re not in Kansas anymore.”

 

32. Some naturalized species can become invasive by either direct competition with native species or genetic pollution through hybridization that can add to negative environmental effects to the native species.

 

33. In any situation you come to, there will be the fear of the unknown. They do not know you and where you are from. Therefore, they will fear you. Fear may at times disguise itself as hatred. Hatred is nonlinear: It attaches itself to things in the future and/or the past, despite the irrelevance of either in the current context. You will likely not realize this is happening at first. Thus, you will continue to smile and socialize and eventually feel the volume of a massive, unseen roadblock in your attempts to do these.

 

34. Some naturalized species, such as palms, can become ecosystem engineers, changing their habitat and creating new niches that affect their ecosystem positively. The potential and/or perceived positive impact of naturalized species are, however, less studied than the potential and/or perceived negative impacts.

 

35. Who lived in America before the Europeans arrived? Native Americans. What group of people was taken to America and sold as slaves? The African people. What territory did the United States buy from France in 1803? The Louisiana Territory. Name one war fought by the United States in the 1800s: The Mexican-American War.

 

36. Learn quickly. Pay attention. This is a test. This is all a test. Everything you do from now on. Everything.

 

37. Everything is new, and therefore exciting.

 

38. After three or four years, tell your mother that you’ve decided to stay. Be happy. This will be a great new experience for you.

 

III.

39. Ask yourself, “What am I doing here?” Your mother worked for the Governor’s Office. Your aunt traveled the world. Your uncle was a police officer. Your grandma is a retired professor. Your house was one of the biggest on the block. Ask yourself, “What am I doing here? In this one bedroom apartment, with no one around who knows us, without a penny in our pockets, in this borrowed room with all of our belongings crammed on top of each other, unable to pay rent, living off the charity of others, more and more in debt. With no one around. From one place to another, nowhere to settle.”

 

40. Sell your soul to Satan. Just kidding. But join a gang, or something that’ll make you feel good. Everyone’s doing it. At least all your friends: the ones from Mexico, Bosnia, Thailand. You’re fourteen, what else are you going to do? Prep for college? Yeah, right.

 

41. Geography: Name one U.S. territory: Puerto Rico. U.S. Virgin Islands. American Samoa. Northern Mariana Islands. Guam.

 

42. Rights and Responsibilities: What are two ways that Americans can participate in their democracy? Join a civic group. Give an elected official your opinion on an issue.

 

43. Tell your mother not to worry. It’s just one D-. You’ve always been a good kid; it’s just a slump. It’s not like the time you got caught shoplifting clothes from the mall. That was out of necessity; you didn’t have any money to buy clothes. This is because it’s cool; everyone is doing it. After all, you left all your toys and clothes back home.

 

44. Get in a fight. Or two. Everyone is doing it. You have to protect your territory. Your girl. Your status. But go to the hospital afterward because they’ll have caught you off guard and jumped you and left you so bruised your mom will almost faint when you get home. She’ll want to yell at you, but she won’t because she’ll be too scared. She’ll break the piggy bank to take you to the nearest hospital and watch over you all night to make sure you take your painkillers. Maybe you’ll have lost the fight. Maybe it will never have been in your favor. But you’ll feel, from that long night of bandages and tears, that the person who got hurt the most was not you.

 

45. The next day, realize that your friends are not who they say they are. That your life is not going the way you want. That you have a right, no, a responsibility to your mother, to yourself, to everyone else, to get it together. Then, as 9th grade ends, ask your mom to move you far away where you can start over.

 

46. Holidays: Name two national U.S. holidays. New Year’s Day. Thanksgiving.

 

47. Eat your first Thanksgiving meal. Your mom’s friend from work invited you two. Take whatever friendships come your way. As long- or short-lived as they may be.

 

48. Try cranberry sauce. Smile. Be pleasantly surprised with the mushy pile of vegetables and bread they call stuffing. Fall in love with yams. Have seconds, thirds, and fourths. Sit. Smile. Say what you’re thankful for. It’s not like home, but it’s nice. This you can get behind.

 

IV.

49. Work. Work hard through high school. Maybe you’ll go to college. Maybe you’ll find a scholarship for undocumented immigrants, though you wouldn’t know where to find such a thing, and neither will your mom. Maybe you’ll get lucky. Somehow.

 

50. Celebrate. Your mother’s boss is willing to pay for your college tuition. It’s just one year of culinary school, but it’s a lot. He’s willing, though. And it means much, much more to you. So you’ll work hard, harder than anyone else in your class. Then you’ll work hard after. After you’ve finished and thrown food up and down hot pans all around the city. People will take advantage. They will invite you to work a test weekend, training, a trial, to see if you’re qualified for the job, then determine you are not eligible because you are undocumented. Then they’ll hand you a twenty-dollar bill for your three days of labor, and they’ll smile because you are not eligible. They will pay you minimum wage for the same labor your coworkers are doing because you are not eligible. You will have to leave many, many jobs prematurely. And you’ll keep working. You’ll work until you find somewhere that will take you, risk and all, and give them your all in return. Weekends. Holidays. Late notices. Duties that don’t belong to you.

 

51. Learn quickly, pay attention, this is a test. You’ve decided to stay.

 

52. American Government: What are two rights in the Declaration of Independence? Life. Liberty. And the pursuit of happiness.

 

53. Experiment.

 

54. Get lost in yourself. This is the land of opportunity, and you feel like you have none. You’re in your prime. Realize there’s nothing here for you and you need to spread your wings and move somewhere else. Start fresh. Try Texas. It won’t work. You’ll miss home, your mom, your sister, your friends. Return. Try new hobbies. Buy new clothes. Lots of new clothes. Look like an American. Eat like an American. Spend like an American. Get stuck. Your wings will be too heavy. Find yourself somewhere else.

 

55. Dream. The winter nights here are long. Winters are long.

 

56. Find a spouse. Get married. Be careful who it is. Everyone will doubt that it’s love. Everyone will wonder if you’re doing it for the papers. The papers. The papers. You will wonder if you’re doing it for the papers. Don’t. Just live. Love. Dream.

 

57. Have children. They will make you more American. You didn’t expect this to happen. Could this really be you? The immigrant with children who don’t speak their home language? Don’t eat their home food? But they do. This is their home. This is all they know. And you will love them anyway. And you will share your home with them, through memories and food and maps and dreams. Because you’re a dreamer. And some dreams never die.

 

V.

58. Cultural bereavement is the experience of an uprooted person or group that results from the loss of social structures, cultural values, and self-identity. The person, or group, continues to live in the past and is visited by supernatural forces from the past while asleep or awake. They suffer feelings of guilt over the abandonment of a culture and homeland. They feel pain if memories of the past begin to fade but find constant images of the past (including traumatic images) intruding into daily life. They yearn to complete obligations to the dead and feel stricken by anxieties, morbid thoughts, and anger that mar the ability to get on with daily living.

 

59. It has been decades since you decided to stay. Decades since you’ve seen the rest of your family, and things have gotten worse. Much worse. But what can you do? You are seas and seasons away. And here, you are nothing. A speck. You have no power to do anything. And it’s getting much, much worse.

 

60. Rights and Responsibilities: What are two rights of everyone living in the United States? Freedom of expression. Freedom of speech. Freedom of assembly. Freedom of petition. Freedom of religion. Name one right only for United States citizens: The right to vote in a federal election.

 

61. Back home things have changed. A forest after a wildfire. But flames still burn.

 

62. Your family sends you pictures. Videos. You see the news. You can’t recognize any of it. There is hope, always hope. Hope that things will return to the way they were, but everyone knows, deep down, that things will never be the way they were. What is left is a dream. A dream of a forest, years after a fire, flourishing again.

 

63. Somewhere along the line, you got distracted. You’ve changed.

 

64. Toss and turn in your bed, night after night.

 

65. Somehow, your mother has stayed the same all this time. This is surprising and comforting. She is, like you, nothing here but still manages to do something. Of this you will take note. You will take note of the years of extra work she and many other freshwater fish put in: the thrift store shopping for new clothes, the food bank visits, the loans, the title loans, the payday loans, the altitude of the chin, the friendships lost and gained, the reset button after an accident, the autopilot, the way a fast food restaurant can suddenly become a palace for a celebration, the piggy banks, the miracles, the indestructible smile, all to give a portion to everyone struggling who stayed home.

 

66. To have freedom to do anything is to have power.

 

67. See yourself succeed. Find a new career. Find a home. Find a purpose. See your mother succeed. After years of work. And work. And work. See her find money and time and purpose in helping family, and peace of mind as you join her. When did you find it all, you don’t know. It all just “happened” as you forged ahead, like a slow-moving river, eventually ending up in the ocean.

 

VI.

68. The civics test covers important U.S. history and government topics. There are one hundred civics questions on the naturalization test.

 

69. It’s July 6th, and you tell your mother that your test is tomorrow. “Maybe I should give you the pamphlet so you can study for when you apply for citizenship, Mom.” No, no. It’s too early for that. “You should begin to study now.” Your mother shakes her head, and grandma jumps in: Okay, who was the first president of the United States? Your mother’s eyes widen, and she looks for a lifeline: The one who’s sitting on the chair? “Nope, that’s not it. Boy, Mom, that’s the easiest question. If you can’t get that one, how are you going to pass the test?” All I know is that Independence Day is July 4th, she says with a smile.

 

70. Take your two-year-old daughter to the July 4th celebration at the park. Flag shirts, flag hats, flag face paint. You’ve had dozens of these, and it’s time for you to give her some of what you’ve had. Take her to the playground, get her an inflatable ball, feed her cheeseburgers with no ham or garlic sauce, take her to watch the parade, and dance with her to country music.

 

71. You have never liked country music. Your spouse told you that it’s the appeal of the simple life that is attractive about it. Family, friends, simple comforts. You’re skeptical. Most country music stars wear as much bling as 50 Cent in his prime. No. It’s something else, and you can’t put your finger on it.

 

72. Somewhere down the line, country music became a symbol of fear. Was it the kids with cowboy hats on the playground who made fun of your accent or the guy at work with a country accent that never lent a hand? Was it college or the news or one isolated incident hidden from your sight for years? You don’t know. But somewhere down the line, you decided country music was not for you.

 

73. Face your fears. Dance to country music with your daughter and your mother and her friends. You will dance surrounded by white folks trying to enjoy their 4th of July. Look at them and listen to the rhythm of the music and remind yourself why the Pilgrims came to America.

 

74. After a few line dances, the speaker will say that in the audience “we have a lot of folks that speak Spanish,” and he wants to apologize now because he doesn’t know a single word of what he is about to say. Then the band plays “La Bamba” by Ritchie Valens.

 

75. Enjoy the music.

 

76. Go home. Get a good night’s sleep.

 

77. There are one hundred civics questions on the naturalization test, and you know most of them. You study harder and harder as the day of your test approaches. You’ve never had test anxiety before, but this is different. Your spouse tests you to prepare.

 

78. How many U.S. Senators are there? We elect a Senator for how many years? Who is one of your state’s Senators now? The House of Representatives has how many voting members? We elect a Representative for how many years? Name your Representative. How many justices are on the Supreme Court? Who is the Chief Justice of the United States now? What is the name of the Speaker of the House? There are four amendments to the Constitution about who can vote; describe one of them. Name three of the original states. What did Susan B. Anthony do? Who was the president during WWI? Who was the president during WWII?

 

79. What is one promise you make when you become a United States Citizen? To be loyal to the United States. To defend the Constitution. To obey the laws. To do important work for the nation if needed. To serve in the military if needed. To give up loyalty to other countries.

 

80. Tell your spouse, “Let’s see how well you do: What is one important thing Abraham Lincoln did?” He was inducted in the Wrestling Hall of Fame.

 

81. Let’s ask your mom. “Mom, name one U.S. territory.” Texas.

 

82. Arrive on time to the interview. Be polite. Look clean. Smile. The interviewer is young and serious. It’s a small, beige office with a large desk and a pile of your previous applications for deferred action, work permits, a green card, green card limitations removal, and citizenship lying on the edge—a history of your formal communications with the United States. A lexical map of the geographic locations where you’ve lived since you arrived. A picture of a long journey. A dream. And the interview begins.

 

83. You don’t have time to settle in. It’s fast. The interviewer asks about your life, not just here and now, but everywhere and at all times, even outside the United States. They ask about your criminal record, your spouse, your children, your parents. You doubt every answer you give. They review your citizenship application. They ask ten questions from the civics test so quickly your hands drip with sweat by the end. And just like that, it’s over. Sign here, review this. This is for your records.

 

84. Just then, you notice something on the naturalization sheet. Somewhere in the middle of a series of formal identifying information lies a phrase, “Former country of nationality: Venezuela.” You pause… This moment is what you’ve been waiting for for the past twenty years. You sign here: you agree to become a United States Citizen. Naturalized. Accepted. No more twenty-dollar bills for hours and hours of labor. No more jumping from job to job because of your “status.” No more selling yourself to anything or anyone you don’t have to. No more anxiety when you see a police officer. No more long winters. No more empty dreams. It’s here and now. But you hang on to that word as it echoes in your mind: former.

 

85. You look at the interviewer and say, “Everything looks good, but I have one question… does the U.S. allow dual citizenship?”

 

86. The interviewer is surprised: You mean… Venezuela?

 

87. “I mean, do they require that you give up citizenship to your previous country?”

 

88. They pause.

 

89. Well, you’ll have to look at the U.S. policy; essentially, no, some countries require that you denounce all ties to former countries; the U.S. is kinda in the middle of the line for all of this; you’ll have to look at the policy on this, it can be kinda tricky; did that answer your question?

 

VII.

90. Once a person feels accepted—at home, somewhere—they begin to protect that somewhere. A large wall surrounding the city. A large army. A law or two. Once sufficient physical/external protection has been implemented—and at times as it is being implemented—a socio-personal/internal defense mechanism is simultaneously employed. An immunity system consisting of social norms, traditions, pack mentalities, and identity narratives. This antibody-type response even works at an individual level, after most external and internal social threats have been subdued or eliminated, past the time of immediate danger, even when distanced from the place of belonging.

 

91. “Perhaps home is not a place but simply an irrevocable condition” (James Baldwin, Giovanni’s Room).

 

92. Crave your native tongue. Yearn for it. Long for it. For decades, you swam in foreign waters, and it was exciting. Now, as you move closer and closer to the shores of this dream, your soul thirsts for the fresh waters of that little lake where it all began. Music, literature, art, movies, television, friendships, food, history. More than ever, you want to resurrect the past, research it, dance with it, and walk hand in hand into the night.

 

93. “Maybe your country is only a place you make up in your own mind. Something you dream about and sing about. Maybe it’s not a place on the map at all, but just a story full of people you meet and places you visit, full of books and films you’ve been to” (Hugo Hamilton, The Speckled People: A Memoir of a Half-Irish Childhood).

 

94. Although the Oath of Allegiance to the United States speaks of renouncing “allegiance and fidelity” to other nations, U.S. immigration law does not explicitly address the topic of dual citizenship. The best summarization of the U.S. government’s position on dual citizenship lies in a U.S. Supreme Court opinion explaining that “a person may have and exercise rights of nationality in two countries and be subject to the responsibilities of both.”

 

95. Just because the United States allows dual citizenship, however, doesn’t necessarily mean that your country of origin does too.

 

96. Claims of other countries upon U.S. dual-nationals may result in conflicting obligations under the laws of each country.

 

97. Receive your approval notice and Oath Ceremony notice. The naturalization ceremony is a solemn and meaningful event. The United States Citizenship and Immigration office asks that you dress in proper attire to respect the dignity of this event.

 

98. Appear at the ceremony with your spouse. The rest of your family will wait for you outside to celebrate. You’ve said so much up to this moment; the only appropriate thing is silence.

 

99. “Language is the only homeland” (Czesław Miłosz).

 

100. You are reminded of a quote a friend introduced you to: “The love of one’s country is a splendid thing. But why should love stop at the border?” (Pablo Casals). You translated to see how this sounds in Spanish. You like the quote, but you hate when online quotes appear without citations because you are never certain if they are true. In this case, it’s not the quote that resonates with you but the idea behind it that lingers. It doesn’t matter if Casals actually said it; someone said it, and that makes the words real. Like sand on a warm beach.

 

101. Decide that change is not bad, that fish can swim in fresh and saltwater, and that a person can—and often does—have more than one home.

Share

Two Poems

Carolene Kurien

 

A Confession

I am a bad horse.

I neigh and hoof my way into the houses

of neighborhood husbands

and commission myself for rides

to know straddle and buck.

Some say my mane is the color

of the death beyond death. Some say

it’s best to avoid direct eye contact.

I ask the hydrangea why it is so hard to forgive

people who have changed. Did you know

the more acidic their soil, the bluer

they get? I am not trying to make a metaphor,

but I am saying that most of my daydreams

involve being loved by large groups

of people. I walk into a surprise party

with a banner that reads Happy Birthday,

You Are A Good Person! Someone has baked

my favorite carrot cake. Someone has bought

more mini razors for my mustache. The people I fuck

in my fantasies have no faces. I can barely make out

their bodies. The ghost of myself whimpers

under the ghost of theirselves,

and none of us can smile. The book I am reading

says it’s not my fault. How I am.

That I was just a kid, apparently. But now I am old;

my teeth will fall out soon. And my empty

mouth will no longer have someone else to blame.

 

 

Saudade

I am eating a jam sandwich the taste of rain.

I am finding it difficult to harness myself

into the concept of forgiveness. Rosmarie Waldrop

wrote Your skin was delicate, like a retracted confession.

The dent in your back I placed wishing coins upon

thin and deepening. Your empty, welling face.

Under a microscope, various teardrops have various

physiognomies. Onion tears reach outward like rhizomes,

ever-wet and blooming. Tears of ending and beginning

are Rorschach tests filled with your features: a boat-shaped

birthmark, a whisper of nose. Under the streetlight I pick

a painting and live it. I walk the cliff at Pourville.

I disassemble into yellow kiss. Above my head floats

an assembly of arms. I am uneasy with what I’ll become.

Share

(the sound of children screaming has been removed)

Kira Compton 

 

Twenty minutes before gunfire erupts in the La Villa High School cafeteria, Cass is getting high in the parking lot. This is normal, at least junior year. Since summer, she’s been sort of dating this stoner, Lacey, a senior with a beautiful tan and shaggy bleached hair and a single dangly earring that twists in the wind. She’s so cool it makes Cass sweat, her bra sticking to her skin and a faint musky smell coming from her armpits. Lacey’s perfection bleeds into something unreal, like the teenagers in movies played by twenty-something, hundred-pound actresses. When Lacey smiles, her California teeth shining in the sun, Cass thinks this must be love. And if this is love, it is new and startling, and she is terrified she will ruin it. The worry runs a tired track in her brain. The weed is nice because it is free, yes, but mostly because it stops the background noise in her skull.  

 

They lie side by side in the bed of Lacey’s truck. Lacey finishes the joint while Cass pretends to watch something on her phone. Onscreen, a large, beautiful girl with a septum piercing mouths a song Cass half remembers. Lacey hums along, drawing circles on Cass’s shoulders. Her fingers are normal fingers, chewed nails and calluses, but they sear her skin. If this isn’t love, she doesn’t know what is.  

 

Lacey says something then, her voice raspy with the edges of sleep—she won’t be fully awake until third period. Cass sets the phone between their heads. The song plays on a loop, soft and catchy. Lacey’s tongue pokes out between her teeth, and Cass chases it with her lips.  

 

Probably, that final moment wasn’t so perfect. Morning breath, sunless skies, the pressing need to piss. But this is how Cass remembers it. 

 

 

The exit wound is clean, but the doctors keep Cass in the hospital for six days. The bullet pierced her left shoulder, skating past arteries and bones. The scar on her back will be horrific but superficial. The ER nurse who rebandages her wound tells her how lucky she is. A centimeter to the right, her shoulder would have shattered. A centimeter to the left, she’d have bled out on cafeteria tile. Dead any other way, according to her nurses, her parents, the investigators that stream through her hospital room and pepper her with questions she doesn’t know how to answer. They are unsatisfied with the truth, no matter how many times she repeats it: I don’t remember, I don’t remember, I don’t remember. At least, she doesn’t remember anything worth talking about.   

 

The first day nurse is vigilant with the squat television in the corner of the hospital room, keeping it tuned to sitcoms with chattering laugh tracks. The nurse on day two doesn’t care, so Cass watches the news stations. The shooting segments are nearly identical, down to how they begin: eight smiling faces lined up in a row, school pictures from a happier day. Their names are never there, but Cass doesn’t need names. Ms. Rainier, the lunch lady who wore her hair in intricate twists, who must have spent an hour getting ready the morning she died; Mr. Gonzalez, her freshman English teacher who told her she would love Franny and Zooey; Tim Robinson, who made fun of her belly in middle school; Al Jones, who was always sleeping, always wearing the same wooly black sweatshirt; Tina Holden, who had been drawing terrible anime for years but was just now starting to get good, even had a few thousand followers on Instagram; Tori Holden, beautiful, untouchable, who wouldn’t be caught dead around her weird sister; Mark Patterson, that first, false male crush; Lacey Gold. It’s Lacey’s junior year picture, back when Lacey and Cass knew each other only in passing, before everything important came to pass. Her hair unbleached and long, a respectable shirt creased at the neck. A small, knowing smirk: this is just a photo for the fireplace mantle, something to keep the parents happy.  

 

Sometimes the station throws Cass’s picture up. It’s from freshman year. An XXL Metallica shirt pools around her, a band she’d been so sure she’d love forever but stopped listening to not long after picture day. They play sound bites of her mother’s weepy voice over the photo. It’s what every parent dreads. I’m so fortunate my baby girl is still here.  

 

No stations talk about the shooter. They’ve stopped naming shooters in the last few years, an attempt to withhold the badge of infamy given to people like Harris and Klebold. Now there is just one Shooter, a shadowy figure lurking in movie theaters and kindergartens. Always a lone male, usually killed on site by his own hand or someone else’s.  

 

The news loop repeats itself until Lacey’s face is imprinted in Cass’s vision. When her mother visits at the end of the day, she snaps the television off. Cass still hears that weepy, interviewed version of her mother, more vivid and sincere than the woman in the hospital chair.  

 

 

The first day nurse is back, and Cass is no longer allowed to wallow in the news. High on morphine, she spends the third day on her phone. With the notifications muted, social media offers a spot of low tide. She floats through an endless stream of videos. Cooking recipes with bright yellow rice and perfectly smashed avocado; craft tips for knitting and crochet, watercolor and oil; beautiful women gliding over red carpets, voluptuous gowns clouding behind them; parsed-down, slowed-down movie moments with the wrong music playing; strangers mouthing last month’s most popular tweet; cats leaping on tables and knocking over vases, glasses, laptops; a thousand lessons on wine, lifting, baby seals, traveling solo, tattooing, social justice, DIY home remodeling, how to 5 to 9 before the 9 to 5, healthy eating, meditating, holding on and letting go. She scrolls and scrolls and finds herself.  

 

It’s an eight-second loop of the moment she burst out of the cafeteria. There’s a filter, making her bright and smooth, as though someone has pulled plastic wrap over her skin and tugged. Her cheekbones are jagged. Her eyes sparkle. The blood on her neck seems strategically placed. Over the loop, the chorus of Sia’s “Unstoppable” plays on repeat.  

 

It seems impossible that someone caught this on camera, but here it is, cycling on her screen. Another student captured what they could from the other side of the street. Cass feels nauseous. She feels something else too, wanton and unnamed. She watches herself escape to safety again and again and again. 12.7K likes. 2.3K comments.  

 

She flips to her notifications, which she has been soundly ignoring. Her Instagram is private, and she’d assumed the little pink dot was simply well wishes from friends and family. Instead, there are thousands of follow requests, hundreds of messages. She’s brave, a hero, lucky. She’s been tagged countless times, has her own hashtag now, #cassandrablake. Turns out, someone was livestreaming everything that happened outside the cafeteria, and everything that happened inside.  

 

She flicks her phone off, pulls the pillow over her face, and screams. 

 

 

The fourth day, Cass refuses visitors. She ignores the nurse’s gentle, probing questions. The TV in the corner stays off, the blank screen a wide and empty mouth.  

 

La Villa may not have the highest kill count or the youngest victims, but thanks to the livestream, her school has captured the eye of the nation. Tina Holden’s follower count has gorged itself, three hundred to thirty thousand (Tori Holden’s private page is not among the followers). The last photo Tina ever posted—a progress update on a drawing of a rose-haired anime girl—has gotten two thousand comments. Cass reads them all. This is so fucked and xoxo rest easy angel and i don’t know you but i am so so so scared and lord jesus, we humbly ask of you, jesus, that you will give them life again, for you are our lord jesus who is always with us even in the darkest of times, amen.  

 

When it gets overwhelming, she flips back to Instagram reels. Her usual recommendations are there, but she spent half an hour watching herself escape. The algorithm noticed. For every thirty reels, there’s one of her. Sometimes she is running out of the cafeteria or being carted into the hospital. Friends have leaked old videos, so there are reels of her jumping into oceans or laughing at lunch tables. Slowed versions of Cass and Lacey lean into each other as the song “Mary on a Cross” twinkles over them.  

 

There’s a version of Cass that’s outraged, but the rage feels young and muffled beneath a broader feeling, a heady sense of anticipation. Hundreds of messages sit luridly in her inbox, unopened. Strange numbers call, and she lets them slip to voicemail.  

 

That night, she goes to sleep early and dreams of The Shooter. Not the boy who shot her, but The Shooter, a vague and menacing figure in camo pants. He’s chasing her, but in the strange logic of dreams, she has her hands around the barrel of his gun and is pulling. Every time she wrestles the gun away from him, another one respawns in his hands, an AK-47 or an MR-16 or another string of letters and numbers she doesn’t understand. The dream doesn’t change. Just this endless chase and tug-of-war, a video loop that never ends.  

 

 

On the fifth day, Cass unprivates her accounts.  

 

Her last post is from the summer, a beach day group photo. Her head is on Lacey’s shoulder. She remembers that Lacey’s earring kept getting in Cass’s face, and when she blew it away, Lacey giggled. This fascinated her—Lacey was too cool for gigglingso she blew on Lacey’s cheek again and again, repeating the experiment until their friends griped at them for ruining the photo. 

 

That evening, Cass has over fifty thousand followers. Huddled under hospital covers, she listens to the voicemails of strangers. Sponsorships, all from figureheads of companies she’s never heard of. She’s an influencer now, the face of something larger than herself. The voices offer condolences, tell her she’s a hero, and doesn’t she want to keep making a difference?  

 

She stands to make a life-changing amount of money. No more rent stress for mom, no need to work a second job. Cass will be able to move wherever she wants after high school—she won’t even have to finish high school, won’t ever have to go back if she doesn’t want to. She’ll bulldoze the cafeteria to the ground and build the Lacey Gold Memorial Garden in its place.   

 

It’s close to midnight when she chooses a number at random and calls. A woman picks up on the second ring. Her voice is metallic over the phone. When Cass signs her life away, she pictures flowers curling through the cracks of cafeteria tile: begonias and lilies, columbines and dead nettle.   

 

 

Cass watches the livestream of the shooting just once, there on her final day in the hospital. 

 

Strike while the iron’s hot, she’d been told. They’ll only have the nation’s attention for so long, and if they want it to matter, they’ll need to be shocking: a livestream of a livestream with Cass watching, still threaded with IVs and a heart monitor. 

 

A woman with severe blonde hair has driven up from LA. She helps Cass get ready—brown dusting under her eyes, her hospital gown askew so that the edgings of her bullet wound are visible. In the mirror, Cass looks strangely beautiful. She’s become one of those twenty-year-old, hundred-pound actresses playing the movie version of herself. 

 

Before they go live, a company-hired therapist checks in with her over the phone. The therapist wants to make sure she is okay reliving the event. She’s sure, yes, okay, but the truth is that she won’t be reliving it—she hardly remembers living it.  

 

What Cass does remember: Her own sweat-stench. Ripe, pungent. She’d pissed herself, the urine soaking into her crotch, her thighs, making her dark jeans darker. She smelled like a wild animal, pure adrenaline. An ape sleeping inside her all this time, awakening in a frenzy and pounding against the inside of her chest: Survive this! Survive this! 

 

She remembers Tori curled over Tina. Hindsight tells her they are dead, but memory tells a different story. Tori shields Tina in a sister’s embrace, simple and protective. Maybe it was only at school that the sisters hated each other. Maybe, back home, they shared a bathroom, a bedroom, a common love for mint chocolate chip ice cream. Maybe they didn’t speak at school because they spent so much time speaking everywhere else. Maybe, back home, the love between them was endless. In her memory, Tori is still breathing.  

 

She remembers being shot, though in a mosaic sort of way, a kaleidoscope of red and orange, yellow and black. Iron in her mouth. Salt in her eyes. Something lancing her shoulder, vaulting her awake. Heat against her neck, gunmetal searing her hands.  

 

She doesn’t remember the shooter. She doesn’t remember taking the gun. She doesn’t remember the last thing Lacey said, the last important thing. Cass can picture the curl of Lacey’s lips moving up and down, but though she has run through the memory every night since, the words are gone. For the livestream to be worth anything, it would need to show her that. She can see it—the camera sliding out of the cafeteria, down the hall, through the parking lot. Sun striking the lens as it presses into the truck bed. Two girls curled into one another, center screen. Chapped lips. Meaningless noise. Lacey’s words, articulated clearly in the shell of her ear. Cass would hear it and know all there was to know. Everything they had been promised would come to pass. Yellow tassels and cheap wine and swollen feet and a boring middle age. They would get it all. The camera would watch them through the years, having no reason to pan to dark cafeteria doors.  

 

Bright lights shiver. The livestream begins. Cass watches what she can’t remember.  

Share

GIOVANNI

Edmund White 

 

What’s left of an ex in my memory? 

He was kind and courtly (as he should have been 

Since he was a Sicilian aristocrat), 

When he wasn’t being horrid if I stepped 

Out of line, then frozen with fury and  

Unforgiving. He taught me one good pasta 

Recipe, Pasta alla Norma, with fried eggplant. He 

Bought me a CD player when mine broke, several  

Cashmere blankets, and he restored a leather 

Club chair that was in tatters. He was a doctor, could play 

The harpsichord, cook a few dishes, entertain 

In his battleship-sized loft, lie and cheat convincingly,  

Make the sort of love a heterosexual Mediterranean  

Male might make, selfish and athletic—and which I liked  

Because it never dwindled away even after we broke up. 

We both cried a lot. He had a black ceramic vase with an 

African face and a crown, until I explained that 

Was unacceptable in politically correct New York. 

Then it was banished, as was I when I told his new  

Lover that Giovanni and I were still having sex. I saw a good shrink 

And got over him. I’ll never have another lover— 

Too much of a bother. Once in a while I wish we could 

Speak on the phone, to find out whether his father’s  

Parkinson’s is progressing, whether his little brother  

Got married, and did he ever discover a cure for that  

Kind of breast cancer. And does he still hate me?  

Share

All We Have: A Conversation with Amy Stuber

Sad Grownups
Amy Stuber
Stillhouse Press
$16 (232 pages)
Publication Date: October 8, 2024

 

The seventeen stories in Amy Stuber’s debut collection, Sad Grownups, are filled with moments of beauty, dread, playfulness, and existential probing. With deft prose, Stuber captures these moods within the span of a single paragraph. The stories aim squarely at questioning the ways we live today. As she notes in the interview that follows, the collection’s title is a nod to one of the book’s major themes: how our society has an unfortunate tendency to create sad grownups.

Sad Grownups is out now.

 

TEGETHOFF: There are a lot of what might be called metafictional elements in these stories. Sometimes they arrive via second person, a “you” interjected that could be the reader, or possibly the writer herself. In other moments, the narrators seem to step back from the stories completely to comment on their progress. The first story in the collection, “Day Hike,” is a prime example of this, with the narrator letting the reader know that she is writing the story. Could you talk about the craft decisions that go into such moments?

 

STUBER: There’s a Bruce Springsteen song phrase from “Dancing in the Dark”: “I’m just tired and bored of myself.” That’s pretty much where I was when I started writing these stories. I had taken a break from fiction and done a ton of flash and had to lure myself back into stories by making them really different from what I had been doing. I may look back on them in a few years and think, Oh, god, these are gimmicky, why did I add that? But during the time I was writing them, I would finish a standard narrative and think, this needs something else, or I’d write a flash and think, this should be expanded and set beside or within another narrative.

 

“Day Hike” started as a flash, I think, about a writer feeling jealous of her friend’s life and accomplishments. But I was simultaneously writing another little thing about a couple going on vacation in Colorado, a place I went as a kid and where I still go once a year or so. The seed of that story was seeing a lot of strangers I passed on a hike I took looking miserable, like they’d rather be doing anything other than hiking, and then just thinking about the things we put ourselves through to feel productive and accomplished to ourselves or in the eyes of others. (I love hiking and walking, don’t get me wrong. But I’m increasingly annoyed by productivity culture, and that’s one of the things I think both threads of this story engage with.)

 

I did not strategically write a collection with metafictional elements, and I didn’t even realize I had until someone pointed it out to me. I was just trying to push myself with regard to what a story could be or do.

 

TEGETHOFF: Related to the first question, these metafictional moments seem to expose the artifice of narrative structure. It’s like you’re asking why these stories should be told in the first place. For instance, there’s this narrative passage from “Dead Animals”:

 

Was everything okay? Was everything going to be okay? Tell me this was pivotal. Tell me it mattered. Tell me Frida would be different and better, with a brain less full of noise and better suited to post-modernity.

 

What do you think these moments add? How do they modify or change a story?

 

STUBER: With “Dead Animals,” I wrote a fragment of a babysitter story about ten years ago. It was just a woman who was kind of a mess taking care of a kid who didn’t really need care and putting her increasingly in harm’s way. It was about three pages and never worked. I picked it up again in maybe 2019 and saw it from a totally different perspective, saw the woman’s backstory, saw how she was always questioning herself, her life choices, and I wanted to make that questioning piece into something outside the narrative, something that could almost be pulled away from the storyline. I wanted the story, all parts of it, to engage more directly with storytelling as a construct, and I hope doing so makes readers think more about building character and, ultimately, building self.

 

Generally, adding these other moments and elements is, I guess, somewhat for texture too: a break, a kind of chorus, something to distract or defuse for a second.

 

TEGETHOFF: Most of the women in these stories feel guarded but also seek some sort of validation for their existence. There’s Sage in “The Game,” for instance, who puts a piece of masking tape on her forehead to see if her husband or sons will notice, but they don’t. Elsewhere, men are more sinister, and the women seem creeped out or exhausted by their presence. Multiple women in Sad Grownups say they prefer the company of women over men. Could you talk about the world the women in this collection inhabit?

 

STUBER: Oh god. This is probably, embarrassingly, the story of my life, feeling guarded but seeking validation: The Introverted Attention Seeker, a memoir.

 

But with regard to the book, I think there’s a continuum here, from women who have decided to simply surround themselves with other women as a preference but also as protection (the mother in “People’s Parties”), to women who want men in their lives, and enjoy their company, but also feel frustrated by the behaviors of the men they interact with and with some of the manifestations of maleness in America (like Sage in “The Game”).

 

I think women have to be on guard. This country is often inhospitable to people who identify as women. Women are constantly being assessed in ways men rarely are for their performance and attitude and appearance, their moods monitored and commented on. We’re denied medical care and access. There are so many physical safety things women think about as a default that a lot of men rarely have to think about. But then we’re also often trained to seek validation—it’s a bad conundrum. So it’s just a reality that filtered into many of these stories.

 

I’m fifty-five and feel increasingly loosened from needing to care about men’s approval or disapproval, which is liberating, but that doesn’t change the fact that as a woman, I have less power and fewer rights.

 

TEGETHOFF: Many of the men in this collection are unpleasant. This characterization might go double for Adam Zanger, the protagonist of the final story, “The Last Summer.” Adam is a poetry professor—and not very good at poetry or teaching, from what I can tell—who has found out he’s dying. He’s lonely, perhaps angry he hasn’t accomplished more in his life. But we see some redemptive qualities in him, mainly as he learns about himself via two sorority girls. How does this story play off the others in the collection, especially in its depiction of men?

 

STUBER: Two-part answer. First, I think there are maybe two tiers of men in these stories. Some of the main characters who are men are a pretty equal mix of good and bad, which I think all people are, like the Adam Zanger character, who is a little isolated and maybe a little misanthropic, but who also sees beauty in poetry and the world and worries about things and wants things. Also like the main characters in the title story and the main character in “Dick Cheney Was Not My Father.” All kinds of fucked up people, but hopefully nuanced and with some, as you said, redemptive qualities.

 

But second part: Yes, a lot of the antagonists in the stories are men. I’ll be honest and say that while I’ve grown up with pretty solidly remarkable men in my family of origin and my current family, I have had a lot of negative experiences with men, ranging from assault to abuse, plus the more insidious sexism that infiltrates daily activities. I think that a number of our current ills can be connected to a kind of hyper-masculinity that’s infused our society and that is concerned more with greed and power than with taking care.

 

I realize that’s a generalization. There are a lot of women who’ve done or do terrible things. I’m extremely imperfect and have done my own bad things, so I’m not setting myself apart from this in any way. But I do think our country needs a shift away from an obsession with strength and toward a concern with caring for people and places and communities. Deemphasizing masculinity is one important way to do this—raising all children to have empathy and express emotion instead of encouraging some kind of inhuman toughness. I think the story “The Game” tries to engage with this, and same for the “Dick Cheney” story. This ties back, for me, to what I see as one of the book’s big themes: that American society, as it is now, is kind of set up to create sad grownups. It’s depressing, I realize, and hopefully I’m wrong.

 

TEGETHOFF: The climate crisis shows up throughout this collection. Characters are blunt about their anxieties and often fairly pessimistic about humanity’s chances. How did you approach this very real emergency we’re living in? Did you feel it was important to be direct about the crisis?

 

I have two teenagers. I see how kids carry the weight of this. Some people might say, “Well, every generation has its issues,” but I don’t think every generation’s issue is so unflinchingly dire. Yes, growing up with the threat of nuclear war was scary, but I think it was somehow less pervasive or maybe easier to compartmentalize. I definitely thought at times about war potentially happening when I was a kid, and I know that brought its own umbrella of fear. Climate crisis feels different. It’s coming at you all the time, from all sides. Fires here. Floods there. And with the recent Supreme Court decision that basically threw regulations out the window [Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, more commonly known as the Chevron case], it’s even more bleak, with corporations holding the bulk of responsibility but being unwilling to make choices that would (if money is all they care about) preserve their future earning power.

 

So I end up mentioning this in a lot of my writing because it’s always there. I would like to be more hopeful about it all, and every now and then I read about something, some technology, some company that cares, some government doing more, something that gives me hope that we may evade whatever worse version of disaster, but it’s hard to think that. I think the only way to move forward under these circumstances is to focus on small, joyful things each day, accumulating those things over a week and a month and a year.

 

TEGETHOFF: There’s this roving search for meaning among the characters in the collection. It almost feels paralytic at times. I’m thinking, for example, of this passage from “Dick Cheney Was Not My Father”:

 

I was one of those people, like so many people I knew, who didn’t have any absolutist sense of trajectory and what should be next. The things people my age knew seemed unessential and thin: how to play board games at big tables with friends while drinking whiskey and how to hibernate for days while binge watching almost anything; most of the rest of the life stuff, the grown-up stuff, we still somehow didn’t know.

 

Could you talk about how moments like this capture the dread of modern life?

 

STUBER: In “Dick Cheney,” the character is wrestling with how to make meaning in his life, when he’s not getting meaning from his job, and with how to be a different kind of man and father from the kind his father is and was. He finds many things in his life trivial, but he ultimately finds that he gets meaning from being a parent and from parenting in a way that allows his child, a boy, to be however he wants, something his own father very much did not do for him. So, yes, a lot of these stories reflect the dread of modern life. But I also think that each story intentionally gives the characters moments of escape or happiness or abandon. I think that’s all we have, really.

 


Amy Stuber has published fiction in New England Review, Missouri Review, Copper Nickel, and elsewhere. She’s a flash editor at Split Lip Magazine. Her debut collection, SAD GROWNUPS, comes out October 8 from Stillhouse Press.

Share

The Lives I Know: A Conversation with Pat Spears

Hotel Impala
Pat Spears
Twisted Road Publications
$19.95 (392 pages)
Publication Date: September 16, 2024

 

David James Poissant: Hotel Impala is a novel that tackles, unflinchingly, questions of homelessness and substandard housing in America. By following six years in the lives of the members of an unhoused family, you ask certain questions of the reader. When readers close this book, what do you hope their takeaways will be?

 

Pat Spears: Those of us who live in cities, large and small, see people with no fixed residence every day. All too often, we look away, so that we can maintain a physical and emotional distance between ourselves and them. But I wonder how often we pause to consider who they are—what their lives are like, how they got where they are, how they live, what hopes they have for themselves. It’s a question I’ve been considering from time to time since I was in graduate school and saw a family with a small child on the street one cold February night. I remember that it was February because my birthday was approaching, and I was thinking about getting out of the cold and finishing off the food from the care package my mom had sent. As I was leaving the campus, I saw them—a man and woman, my age or slightly older, and a child, maybe three or four, huddled together beneath a streetlight. The boy sat slumped on what appeared to be a cardboard suitcase, and I imagined him tired, cold, and hungry. He leaned against the woman I took to be his mother, and I tried to imagine what she might have said to comfort him. The light changed, and I drove away. I felt I should have stopped, although I had no idea what I might have said or done. Until that moment, I had understood homelessness only as a construct. Now it was real.

 

The image of the boy and his family has stayed with me all these years since. I want to believe that a random encounter, decades earlier, had planted a story seed, an emotional memory that has remained. Perhaps it is true that our hearts hold memories, waiting for our conscious minds to catch up.

 

What I want Hotel Impala to do is to help close the emotional distance between “us” and “them”—the housed and the unhoused. I want readers to feel their humanity: the pain and fear of life on the streets, but also the yearning for something better. Yes, Grace and Zoey were, at times, cold, hungry, and afraid. They also loved and were loved. They were curious and inventive and loyal. And they each dreamed of some bright future.

 

David James Poissant: This is a novel that couldn’t be told from one point of view, and the book thrills by accommodating so many characters’ viewpoints. As a writer, how do you move from viewpoint to viewpoint so gracefully?

 

Pat Spears: The character Leah is clearly not well, but she is frequently in denial. The core of the story is the chaos created by her erratic behavior and insistence that she is fine and that everyone else must see her as she sees herself—“live inside Mom’s twisted reality,” as twelve-year-old Grace puts it. Each character is part of the same dynamic, but everyone experiences the conflict between their loyalty to Leah and their own yearnings differently.

 

To make the point of view shift work, I chose to follow the chaos, examine the character whose yearning was most impacted in each scene, and show their individual responses.

 

The Leah character is different from anything I’ve written before. Getting inside Leah’s head was both challenging and terrifying. And of course, it was the fact that she is such an unreliable narrator that made the multiple points of view necessary.

 

Grace was interesting because she was both truth-teller and advocate for Leah’s and Daniel’s lies. The thing that defines Grace is her yearning for a “normal” mom—or at least one with a noble illness, like cancer, so she won’t have to feel ashamed.

 

The yearning of Daniel’s character is more toward self-preservation than any other character except Zoey, who just wants what she wants. The thing that drives Daniel is the fact that his love for Leah and his desire to protect his children could be—and is—derailed by his desire simply to survive Leah’s rages.

 

Josey, Ellie, Jordan, and Moses are at some distance from the chaos but are nevertheless drawn into it. Josey reacts with concern and handwringing, Ellie and Jordan each with their own version of helpful action, and Moses becomes the ultimate truth teller.

 

David James Poissant: In spite of the horrors throughout this novel, or maybe because of them, there is also a thread of occasional humor. I’m thinking in particular of the tampon conversation during which Daniel feels as though he’s “swallowed an entire hippo in one gulp” while trying to parse the meaning of Grace calling him “basic.” What’s your method for juggling tone in a book of this size?

 

Pat Spears: Leah’s “flare-ups,” the cycles of her illness, create the rhythm of the story. That rhythm made changes in mood and tone largely intuitive. There are places, particularly after the darker scenes, where it felt like the story needed to take a deep breath.

 

Much of the humor was in service of the story, of course, but it was also for me. This was not an easy book to write. I write for emotional connection between the reader and the characters. When what I’ve written makes me laugh or cry, I trust the writing.

 

The humor just comes naturally to me, having come from a tradition of front porch storytellers. My dad could tell a joke at the most improbable, and sometimes inappropriate, times, because that’s what Southern storytellers do. Dorothy Allison said it best, in an interview she did a few years ago. She said of Southern writers: “We can make you laugh and cry at the same time, which is my favorite thing. I work hard to do a kind of seduction in which you read sections that are very funny and charming, and then, two paragraphs later, it ain’t charming. It ain’t funny. It’s horrible. And to have both of those things happen at the same time, that’s life” (Garden & Gun, Nov. 22, 2019).

 

One of my favorite scenes in Hotel Impala that demonstrates that kind of desperate humor is the one where Leah has lied to a judge to get a restraining order against Daniel, so that he can no longer attend Grace’s basketball games. Grace makes up an elaborate lie to explain his absence and ponders the irony of the fact that her mother’s behavior seems to require no explanation.

 

“When Grace grew so tired of her family’s lies, she fantasized about a moment when she would grab the mic and give her own introduction: Welcome your Tiger’s leading scorer: at 5’11”, playing center forward, our very own Grace Killian! Daughter of an accused wife-beater and a loony mother! Wild cheering would explode from the fans.”

 

David James Poissant: From one South-haunted writer to another, place seems important to you. Another novel of yours, It’s Not Like I Knew Her, set in Florida and Alabama, is setting-specific, historically, but I wonder if you see Hotel Impala working in the same way? Seems like there are any number of cities down on their luck that could provide a setting for this novel. Is that choice intentional? Do you see this novel as more universal than your others, or is universality even a helpful construct in fiction?

 

Pat Spears: Yes, place has always been a critically important part of my writing—almost another character. When I started writing Hotel Impala, I struggled with place. I had set early versions of the novel in several different, specific places. But I gradually realized that my struggle with place was because I was not approaching it correctly.

 

In the beginning of the novel, Leah and her family appear to others to be somewhat settled, but that is an illusion. Through most of the story, they are transient. The decision to have them occupying an unspecified city was not so much to suggest that the story could have happened anywhere, although I think that is also true, but to suggest their being untethered—that they have no place.

 

I also wanted to suggest that Leah’s yearning did not involve a “place” in a real sense, a spot on the map, if you will. She’s following her yearning to be healed by the magical power of the whooping crane. Interestingly, Leah’s search for the whooping crane leads her back to my home, to the place I’ve always written into my stories, and connects her to an individual who has been in that place for generations. And a one-hundred-year-old alligator, also a native to that place. Then, while writing, the Moses character arrived unexpectedly and fully formed, and I knew him immediately at an emotional level.

 

I’m not sure what that means, but that’s where the story pulled me. Maybe it means that, in order to write that final scene, I needed grounding in something familiar.

 

David James Poissant: Ranking books is a risky business, but Dorothy Allison’s Bastard Out of Carolina is definitely on my list of the ten most important American novels of the last fifty years. Hotel Impala opens with an epigraph from Allison’s novel, and your story “Pink Moon” appears in an anthology introduced by Allison. Can you speak to the influence that Allison has had on your work, over the years, or your ideas of what the novel form, at its best, can do?

 

Pat Spears: When I need more truth in my stories, I turn to Dorothy Allison. I have always loved it when she talks about the risk you take when you willingly make readers uncomfortable. Her novels, which in my view represent the very best of the novel form, pull readers in and hold them there. She leaves no space for the reader to get comfortable enough to wander off into their own fantasies, thereby becoming the storytellers themselves.

 

That’s the part of Allison’s work that I’ve tried to emulate: to create a narrative that draws the reader in and compels them to stay. One in which they see and hear and feel what my characters are seeing and hearing and feeling to the exclusion of everything else. Because that’s what novels have always done for me. They have allowed me to walk alongside someone I had never before imagined, much less known, and know them.

 

David James Poissant: Beyond Allison, which writers do you admire most, and what are your favorite novels or stories? Which books, if any, do you return to again and again?

 

Pat Spears: When I first began writing fiction, I wrote short stories. It was a decade or more before I even contemplated writing a novel. One of the best short stories I’ve ever read was “A Small Good Thing” by Raymond Carver. I’ve read it again and again, along with every other story he’s written. Carver was, of course, the grand master of the minimalist style and has had a significant influence on my own writing style.

 

As I began considering writing a novel, Annie Proulx became a favorite, with her mastery of both short stories and novels. In her novel Postcard, there are scenes that are as chilling and as brilliantly written as anything I’ve ever read.

 

As a writer, when I am struggling with dialogue, I turn to Cormac McCarthy. McCarthy allows one to appreciate the importance of what is not said as opposed to what is said. He was marvelous at infusing dialogue with subtext.

 

Rick Bragg is one of those writers for whom place is essential, and my favorite of his books, Ava’s Man, is probably the best example. As you read it, which I have done several times, it becomes clear that the story could not have happened anywhere else. Ron Rash’s stories have a similar connection to place.

 

Other favorites include Colson Whitehead and Louise Erdrich. Colson Whitehead’s The Nickel Boys is set in a location that was practically in my backyard as I was growing up, and I know the setting and some of the history upon which it was based.

 

Finally, there were two books I referred to over and over as I prepared to write Hotel Impala: Madness by Marya Hornbacher and The Invisible Child by Andrea Elliott.

 

David James Poissant: Finally, if you could offer one craft tip or nugget of wisdom to the aspiring novelist, what would you say? What do you wish you’d learned earlier as a beginning writer?

 

Pat Spears: This is a difficult question to answer. Developing as a writer is, by its nature, an extremely personal process.

 

I will say that I wish I had been braver. I wish I had made the decision to walk away from my work and try my hand at writing much earlier.

 

The other thing I will say is how important it is for writers to find their own voice and to write their own truth. Reading other writers whom you admire, and with whom you connect, can help, but only as long as you use them as guides and don’t try to imitate them.

 

When someone asks me to elaborate on my propensity for writing deeply flawed characters, the question is often delivered with a certain hesitancy while the speaker searches for a kind way of asking why I choose fictional losers over rousing heroes. While I find no fault with straightforward heroes, I hold tight to my passion for writing characters that readers may resist but are nevertheless drawn to—not losers but characters and stories that reveal the astonishing lives of those teetering on the edge of human disaster and social acceptability.

 

I know these characters and their stories because they are my kin—with all their hard-earned wisdom, social warts, and sometimes-devastating consequences driven by ignorant pride. These are the lives I know to write.

 


Pat Spears is the author of three novels and numerous short stories. Her second novel, It’s Not Like I Knew Her, won the bronze medal for Foreword Review’s Book of the Year in LGBTQ Fiction. Her short stories have appeared in numerous journals, including North American Review, Sinister Wisdom, Appalachian Heritage, Common Lives, Lesbian Lives, and Seven Hills Review, and anthologies including Law and Disorder (Main Street Rag), Bridges and Borders (Jane’s Stories Press), Saints and Sinners: New Fiction from the Festival 2012, and Walking the Edge: A Southern Gothic Anthology (Twisted Road Publications). She is a sixth generation Floridian and lives in Tallahassee, Florida with her partner, two dogs, and one rabbit.

Share

Instar

Anton DiSclafani 

 

In early August, my husband finds a Luna moth with an injured wing while walking our dogs. The wing is luminescent and green, torn nearly in half. We put the moth, which will never fly again, into a netted terrarium, a former home for caterpillars that arrived in pupae form. Our children—two boys, six and three—had ignored the caterpillars. I didn’t blame them. The whole experience felt perfunctory, riskless. Go to insect.com and order caterpillars that are almost butterflies, caterpillars surely raised in some sort of caterpillar factory, ready to enter the next stage of life as soon as they are unpackaged. 

 

My husband jokes that the Luna moth is in hospice care. Otherwise, of course, it would be cruel to keep. Its delicate legs cling to the netting, hour after hour. I wonder what the moth makes of the chaotic sounds that surround it, the little boys who peer into its face. If it hears, or sees. 

 

My older son speaks to it, seems unfazed when it doesn’t respond to his voice. This boy is most at home in the natural world. My husband says he was born into the wrong family. I have never camped. My husband used to, when he was young, but it has been years. Luna moths, we learn, do not eat or drink in their short time—a week, ten days—on earth. They exist only to reproduce.  

 

It becomes a she one morning when we wake to dozens of nearly microscopic eggs, scattered thickly upon the netted walls of her final home. I’ve never seen her move, but she must have moved, injured though she is, in the night. I am glad for her, that she served her purpose, that she will not die in vain, though I know that to feel anything on behalf of a moth is ridiculous.  

 

Like the caterpillars, our Luna moth offers a guarantee: she will die, and we will watch her do it. 

 

 

When the moth enters our house, my older son is about to begin kindergarten for the second time. It is common in our football-obsessed town to redshirt your children, especially boys, so that they are bigger for sports, but that is not why we do it. We do it because he is struggling to read. Whether or not this is because he wasn’t explicitly taught at his free-range Montessori school, or because he is dyslexic, remains to be seen.  

 

When the moth enters our house, I am happy. We’ve entered a contented phase. It took me a long time to feel like myself after our younger son was born, three years ago.  

 

But now I do.  

 

 

 

The moth lives alongside her eggs for a few days, then she begins to die. When I think of moths, I imagine the small brown kind that eat holes in sweaters and flock to light. But this moth is beautiful, lovelier than any butterfly I’ve ever seen. She is as large as my hand, iridescent green with yellow spots that resemble eyes, to fool predators. She disintegrates, bit by bit. I find a piece of her wing at the green bottom of her cage; by the next morning, she lies crumpled, surrounded by the rocks and assorted talismans my older son installed there. He loves objects: marbles and coins and bits of things he finds in the world. He comes home with rocks and moss and desiccated insects. I throw away his treasures in secret, when he is sleeping or at school. He doesn’t miss them unless I am careless and he sees something he once loved at the top of our trash. 

 

A friend is over when my son sees the dead moth at the bottom of its terrarium, and at first, he is stricken, but he catches himself, acts as if it’s no big deal. Because he has a friend over. The bravado of a watched boy. 

 

The eggs hatch in stages. There are dozens of tiny caterpillars, and some of them make their way through the netting and disappear. My son and I look up their food sources, find a sweet gum tree and cut a branch.  

 

Almost all of the first wave of caterpillars die, because I didn’t think to change the branch and they cannot survive without fresh food. I consider taking the cage outside, unzipping it, letting the caterpillars into the world, where they will almost certainly die.  

 

I decide to try one more time.  

 

 

My younger son starts preschool at the same Montessori program my older son just left. Ships, passing in the night, we joke. He leaves his home daycare, run by an Iranian-American woman I have come to love. I joke that she saved my sanity, but it is not really a joke. My husband and I traded off childcare for the first two years of his life, but I was more tethered to the baby, especially early on, when he nursed.  

 

This woman loves my child. And I love her, because she loves my child, part of a trend I’ve noticed: I love the people who care for my children. And when we have to leave them, as we always do, children flying through one stage after another, I am unbearably sad.  

 

For a year, she greeted me at the door in the morning, asked me about my son’s night, his morning. I will never stand in her foyer again.  

 

I text her on my younger son’s final day and tell her I can’t do pick up, or I will cry.  

 

 

 

I keep the second wave of caterpillars alive. The first time I count there are twenty. They are so tiny it is difficult to think of something to compare them to—the white part of my fingernail. Twenty eyelashes, bundled together. My friend directs the Museum of Natural History in our town, and I text her questions. She tells me Luna moths are her favorite Saturniid, and I feel a strange sort of pride, as if I have anything to do with it.  

 

My favorite parts of my days are when I am alone, when my children are gone, and when my children come home and I play with them. Cook for them, bathe them, change their clothes, wipe their bottoms. The list is endless; sometimes I feel more servant than parent. There’s not a lot of difference, my husband says.

 

I worry over the caterpillars. Every night I remove the branches to which they cling, and I count them. We sit at our kitchen table, which is the kitchen table from my childhood home. The table is old, pine, and my mother took better care of it than I do—she rubbed oil into its surface when it was dry, swept the crumbs from it every night with a damp sponge. I never complete the former chore, only sometimes the latter.  

 

My sons like when the caterpillars crawl on their arms. I like this, too, because it delights my children. I worry that the caterpillars will not know there is a new, fresh branch, so I take a needle and gently separate them from the old leaf, transport them to the new.  

 

My friend the scientist tells me I might rip their insides out this way, and I am horrified that my carefulness was so wrong. I take the small scissors I used to trim my children’s fingernails when they were babies and cut around the tiny, neon green caterpillars and transfer bits of caterpillar-occupied leaf to the new leaves. It is time-consuming but satisfying, a task that is finite and clear, unlike writing.  

 

You will do anything to make your life complicated, a different friend says. He is a man. I can’t imagine a woman saying this. All the women I know complicate their lives like I do. With children and pets and gardens. 

 

Things to care for.  

 

 

My husband asks how my babies are. But I don’t feel maternal toward the caterpillars. I feel enchanted by them. Something otherworldly is unfolding, so close to me. When one caterpillar touches another, the touched caterpillar rears up and swings its body around, aggressively, and though I assume this is nothing more than instinct, I can’t tell what purpose it serves. To scare? To try to identify the touch as friend or foe? Perhaps it is simply a reflex, meaningless without context. 

 

I watch them eat around the edges of leaves. They are active unless they are molting, in which case they look like they are praying, their front legs lifted from the leaf, clasped together. They stay like this for a few days, then they shed their skin, which we find later, dotting leaves like mummies. 

 

One time we see a caterpillar in the process of tugging its new body from its old. I’ve never seen anything like it. I tell my son it is rare to witness such a thing. A creature in its most vulnerable state, its skin soft and new. Untouched. 

 

None of them have individual personalities. Maybe I would ascribe traits to them if I spent more time with them, but I doubt it. They are too tiny, too driven by the most basic of needs: Food. They move slowly. They never seem afraid, or even aware of my presence.  

 

My older son and I see one poop, the flaps on its rear unfolding with elegant simplicity. My son is delighted, almost hysterical. His humor veers toward the scatological. My husband tears the tiniest piece of toilet paper for the caterpillar, and my son roars with laughter.  

 

Every night my husband goes to our sweetgum tree and cuts a branch. With my phone’s flashlight we check it for the parasites I have read could kill them. After a while he has to use a ladder, because we have stripped the tree of its lower branches.  

 

 

After spending a summer learning the basics of phonics with a tutor, then a month of kindergarten for the second time, my son reads a word. Haltingly, slowly, he reads. I yell in excitement, startling him. But he is happy. To have pleased me.  

 

When my younger son was six months old, I fed him scrambled eggs, and his face turned bright red. He was diagnosed first with an egg allergy, then with a peanut and almond allergy. I learned everything I could about oral immunotherapy, the process by which the allergic is fed increasing doses of their allergen. I found it on the Internet. No doctor ever mentioned it to me. OIT makes perfect sense: You teach the body to tolerate the poison.  

 

Nobody near us performs OIT on children as young as my son, even though the research is astoundingly clear: The younger the child, the more flexible the immune system. The younger the child, the better OIT works.  

 

I considered taking my baby, seven months old at that point, to Houston once every other week for treatment, which would have required an hour and a half drive to the airport, then a flight, then an overnight stay. Then I found an allergist in Birmingham, two hours away, and my husband and I, with the flexible schedules of academics, took him every Monday.  

 

His allergy disappeared before he had all of his teeth.  

 

My older son goes to a tutor every week, but I decide this is not enough. I’ve read articles and studies about the dyslexic brain that suggest that the dyslexia is a chicken and egg problem. Since the dyslexic child does not enjoy reading, he does not read, never changing the neural pathways of his brain that would make reading easy.  

 

I lean hard on a study that scanned the brains of young children before and after intensive phonics tutoring. There was almost no difference between the post-tutored brains and the brains of children who were not dyslexic.  

 

We hired another tutor to come to our house on the weekends. We read book after book after book.  

 

It is the only way I know how to approach a problem. To, as I explain to my mother, nip it in the bud. The allergies, the dyslexia. I am well aware there are situations that I will not be able to nip in the bud, that we have been lucky, so far. My older son might struggle in school. At first, this idea undoes me. Then I adjust. I think of the people I know who don’t read as much as I do. My sister’s wife, who is one of my favorite people in the world, has never read my books. It is a family joke.  

 

I want my son not to be unhappy. But that is impossible. I want to choose his unhappinesses. I don’t know what I would choose, if given the choice.  

 

 

 

My children like letting the lime green caterpillars crawl on their arms. But the caterpillars grow quickly, and their bigness alarms them. My younger son cries one evening, at dusk, the time of day we usually tend to them. After dinner and baths, before stories and bedtime.  

 

Off, he says. I want it off. 

 

I understand. Their heads have turned large and brown, their legs more articulated. I don’t feel the same affection for them, and I wonder if this is what having teenagers is like. 

 

Each new version of the caterpillar displaces the older ones. I marvel at how tiny they were when I look at pictures on my phone. It is the same way with my children. Watching videos of them from six months ago, a year—it is like watching strangers whom I love.  

 

I feel no tenderness toward the caterpillars, but I do want them to survive. It pleases me, to watch them grow. To see them eat.  

 

If I listen closely, I can hear them chewing.  

 

 

My older son has some of the warning signs for dyslexia, which is not a learning disability but a learning difference. He was a late talker. He confuses his bs and ds, but most children his age do. The biggest warning sign is that he is having trouble learning to read. I learn that the brains of children undergo a transformation when they learn to read; dyslexic brains do not undergo the same transformation. I learn that there are different kinds of dyslexia, that as many as twenty-percent of the population is at least somewhat dyslexic. I learn that dyslexics tend to have great spatial abilities, that they are, for example, good at Minecraft. I learn so many interesting things about dyslexia, about the brain, about reading and language. I hope none of it applies to my son.  

 

My older son is sensitive. Often he cannot tell us why he is upset, but as he’s grown older my husband and I have started to understand him better: He is most disturbed when a plan of his does not go as he thought it would. He thought he was going to come home and eat popcorn while watching cartoons, and we tell him he is in fact going to soccer practice, and he disintegrates.  

 

The problem is that often we don’t know what his plans are until they’re disrupted.  

 

 

The twenty caterpillars survive for a few weeks. Then they start to die. For no apparent reason. One by one. I find them at the bottom of the terrarium. I scour the Internet and read that disease and fungus are common among caterpillars, can kill off dozens in one fell swoop.  

 

I have no way of knowing what kills them, but I know what doesn’t kill them: A living predator. A bird, a human.  

 

I hate to see them dead, and in this one area of my life, I am uniquely powerless. Before the illogic of the idea reveals itself, I consider taking them to the vet.  

 

I hide the dead caterpillars before my children can see them. My older son becomes suspicious. Weren’t there more? he asks.  

 

No, I tell him. I don’t think so. If I admitted there were, I would have to admit I’d disposed of them in secret. That I have, from a certain perspective, lied.  

 

I think nothing of lying to him. It occurs to me that I should. 

 

 

My older son begins to read in earnest. Simple words—consonant vowel consonant—but still he is reading. I feel both a profound relief and a sense of dread: That we have solved this problem, that there will surely be another problem in his childhood that I cannot solve. It’s not a question of if, but when. Because he is a person. Because a life without problems is impossible.  

 

 

 

Look, I say to my husband, to my children—look. The caterpillars have gone from microscopic to the size of my pinkie finger in a month, and now they are preparing to enter pupae form. There are six of them left. When I finally tell my son that some of the caterpillars have died, he is unbothered. The remaining six find the dead leaves at the bottom of the terrarium, leaves I have left there for precisely this purpose, and begin to wrap themselves inside them. It is an ingenious disguise, if you don’t account for lawnmowers: A bird sees a dead leaf, not a meal.  

 

Look, I say, to my husband and children. Look. We all look. We are all amazed. None of us has seen anything like it, up close.  

 

I am so proud that I saved them.  

 

 

 

On Easter morning, half a year later, we are in the garage, putting on shoes in preparation for meeting meet my parents for brunch. I have forgotten about the pupae, who sit in their terrarium in our garage, still clothed in leaves. I assume they have all died, but I don’t have the heart to throw them away, and I know from my friend that there is a small chance they have overwintered, remained in pupae form until the spring.  

 

But my older son has not forgotten. He checks the moths every day.  

 

Look, he says. At first I think he is pointing to an old can of paint. But no, it’s a Luna moth that has emerged during the night.  

 

My life will change in unimaginable ways over the next year. Illness, birth—I am pregnant with my third child. The normal vagaries of time that bring pleasure and pain.  

 

Too on the nose, my husband says, referencing the moth’s surfacing on a day celebrating resurrection, a joke our children are years away from comprehending. But there is awe in his voice.  

 

We let our older son unzip the terrarium, watch in our driveway as the moth flies away. It grows smaller and smaller, a glimmer in the bright sky.  

 

A flash of green, a spark of something from another world. 

Share

Review: Pretty: A Memoir by KB Brookins

Review of Pretty: A Memoir, by KB Brookins; Knopf; $28.00; 240 pages; May 28, 2024

Review by Dani Sarta

 

KB Brookins’s third published book and first memoir, Pretty, is an artfully queer ode to growing up in a society that doesn’t “get” you and to the ongoing journey of crafting your own space amid recent, globally traumatic years. By way of Black cultural references, queer theory and literature, and a homegrown love of the Texan South, Brookins leads readers through their life growing up as a masculine Black girl learning to show the world who they really are.

 

Composed of essays and poems, and divided into four sections, this memoir begins with Brookins’s early days. After laying the foundation of their birth and adoption at two years old, they offer a brief disclaimer, reminding the reader that “the mind has a way of shielding the body from what it can’t contain… so know that this story isn’t the full one… but is composed of the moments too interestingly gendered to pass up.” The moments they choose to share are incredibly raw and relatable to anyone who grew up under similar constraints of gender, sexuality, and/or religion. From being told at five years of age to “close [their] legs” because of the men around them to starting the deconstruction of their relationship with Christianity at twelve, Brookins recounts hallmark memories shared by many queer people, as well as most girls raised in “the church.” Still, each experience is seasoned by the Texan conservatism they suffered, as well as their family’s deep connection to the Christian church, making these experiences uniquely their own.

 

 Later, the memoir focuses on Brookins’s struggles with sexuality as a teenager in a budding Internet space. They explore websites like MySpace and engage in relationships beyond what they are told is “normal.” And in the third section, Brookins turns the mirror to the darker, painful parts of self-exploration; frustration expressed in unhealthy ways; the concept of toxic masculinity in Black, queer spaces; and a misunderstanding of Black “man/boyhood” due to being socialized as a Black woman/girl.

 

This section begins with a poem titled “Toxic Masculinity,” which discusses the cycle of abuse, generational trauma, and racism against Black men, and how all of these pains manifest in other areas of Black men’s lives. The poem is followed by the titular essay in which Brookins admits to embracing toxic masculinity while in a queer relationship, feeling compelled to fall back on the examples of masculinity they knew when faced with a situation that forced them to see their gender in an unexpected way. The last two essays of this section, “I Get Least of You” and “23andMe,” address Brookins’s relationship with their adoptive father and his relationship to masculinity. Brookins also details their brief but unsuccessful dive into 23andMe to find their biological father.

 

In Brookins’s letter to their adoptive father, they write, “What does it mean to parent yourself in a world that sees you as a man while you are a boy? What does it mean to be told that you’re a boy—like I was told that I was a girl—and have Blackness cloak that boy in some predetermined fate? I was never a Black boy, but now I’m expected to be a Black man. I’d love to get the MO on all I missed from boyhood with you and dad #2.” Having no experience being raised as a Black boy, Brookins struggles to embody the image of a Black man. By the end of the section, Brookins has not been able to connect with their biological father, but there is a beautiful moment of reconnection with their adoptive father after Brookins begins social and medical transition. The two share “a conversation that wasn’t possible when [they] came out in high school” with “more understanding, more patience, less grief and loss in the air.”

 

A majority of the essays, like “23andMe,” conclude with a few paragraphs or pages of hope for the future. Some readers may find this tedious or unjustly optimistic, but such moments are best read as acts of resistance or self-love (which is resistance in its own right), in which Brookins reaffirms their author’s note. This is a memoir they wish had existed when they were transitioning, the memoir they needed as a teenager, as a child, and even now. To further this resistance, halfway through the memoir, Brookins writes, “We must believe people when they tell us who they are. We must create a culture where people’s reality always overpowers other people’s bigotry.” This centers the memoir around the act of forming an ideal reality, regardless of others’ discomfort.

 

This resistance comes into full view in the final section of the memoir. As Brookins writes, “Each adverse experience and day of literary discourse on Twitter should be radicalizing us to create a new literary America…Writing is an extension of living, so we have to study and practice love in the same ways that we study and practice craft.” Throughout this section, Brookins criticizes the ways that liberalism and “diversity” within companies and institutions (especially the publishing industry) often suffer from a normalized, hyper-white focus, and how, despite Brookins’s complex and layered background, they are often forced into the box of the “token” Black person in a room. They show from their experiences that very rarely does an organization that prides itself on its diversity or “wokeness” understand the nuance of multiple identities, such as those that Brookins encompasses. Such institutions, Brookins argues, generally alienate those they claim to care about.

 

Still, the memoir celebrates intersectional identities and Brookins’s journey to identify as a member of multiple communities, emphasizing the importance of existing for yourself while doing the systemic work to help others exist alongside you. As Brookins writes in the title essay, “We can shed ourselves, be limitless, and embody everything pretty. I am mine, you are yours, this world is ours, everyone’s, to be safe in.” While this call to action arrives long before the memoir’s end, the call is clear: live a life of love and care, and insist that the world change for the better.

Share

Review: My Infinity by Didi Jackson

The Frenzy to Live: A Review of My Infinity, by Didi Jackson; Red Hen Press; $16.95; 96 pages; September 3, 2024
Review by Emily Rose Miller

 

Didi Jackson’s second collection of poems, My Infinity, is a quiet, pensive reckoning with life and death by a speaker uniquely suited to discuss such enigmatic subjects. My Infinity follows the speaker of Jackson’s first collection, MOON JAR (Red Hen Press, 2020). Readers of MOON JAR will recognize that the poems in My Infinity continue to grapple with the aftermath of the poet-speaker’s late husband’s suicide. While these books complement and expand one another in delightful ways, My Infinity can be read as a stand-alone collection.

 

The book presents poignant, direct moments that meditate on the speaker’s grief, moments as in the poem “AFTER MY HUSBAND’S SUICIDE I VISITED A PSYCHIC IN CASSADAGA, FLORIDA,” which reads, “and I hoped for a way / into the dark // an escape hatch from this world / toward his spirit.” Likewise, in the poem “VIGIL,” Jackson writes, “I’ve learned how to keep / ashes in the firebox that heap / as high as decades. / They remind me of / his ashes, the ones / I keep on my nightstand.” Such lines owe their power to their gut-wrenching specificity. In their specificity, the words become universal, speaking to the grief, the loss, and perhaps most importantly, the living we all experience the world over.

 

My Infinity is broken into five sections. The second section consists entirely of poems about and from the point of view of Hilma af Klint, a Swedish artist who lived from 1862 to 1944 and is considered to have made some of the first abstract art in the Western world. Af Klint was heavily involved in spiritualism, namely Theosophy, which informed her art, writing, and life. Jackson’s portrayal of af Klint is a fascinating addition to the collection and begs the obvious question: Why?

 

It is clear that af Klint’s work fascinates the poet-speaker, and that af Klint’s feelings of grief and inquisitiveness echo the speaker’s own. But the biggest moment of connection arrives with the poem “THE TREE OF KNOWLEDGE,” which ends: “Like Hilma, I want to decode it all, / but I’ll never know why / I was left a widow. / Only that the two swallows are me, / dividing into two selves, my desire reawakening, / my sorrow forever rooted.” We see, too, elements in which the speaker finds uncanny connections between af Klint’s life and work and her own, as again in “THE TREE OF KNOWLEDGE,” when Jackson notes, “[my husband] was only 44. The same age as Hilma / as she started the paintings of the temple.” Jackson’s poems surrounding af Klint underscore grief’s universality, as if to say: this may not be a unique struggle, which I take comfort in, but it is as uniquely mine as yours is yours.

 

For all the ruminations on grief in this collection, there is also joy, persistent and worth clinging to. In “THE LEISURE OF SNOW,” for example, we join the speaker on a quiet day as she witnesses “the leisure of the snow / falling like a Rothko // over the morning.” Almost prayerfully, the speaker allows the reader to sit with her in this moment of reprieve from the harshness of the world, saying, “I prefer to beat // the dawn; but this I shouldn’t have to explain: / for the morning is naked and beautiful // and yawns many times before turning / on the light. I am there // to see.” Yet, even here is the hint of hurt with the enjambment of “I prefer to beat.” Such subtle pain is masterfully rendered here and in the rest of the collection. Witnessing the soft beauty of the natural world is enough for the speaker on this morning. In the midst of life, so often filled with loss and turmoil, the quietness of this moment must be enough.

 

Still, the speaker finds joy even in pain. On multiple occasions, the speaker tells us that she suffers from migraines, especially after the exertion of sex. In “‘WHAT YOU SEE IS WHAT YOU SEE,’” she says, “Frank Stella would be proud of my migraines / especially those that come after sex— // exquisite pleasure, then blindness” … “Under this geometric spell // and pills like wasps beneath my tongue, / I am the closest to my true self, // and I secretly love my agony.” Such lines remind us that life is an amalgamation of every emotion and experience, some good, some bad; without one, we could not experience the other. For the speaker, her “exquisite pleasure” and her “agony” are forever intertwined, a fact she not only seems comfortable with but embraces. And this is the driving truth of My Infinity: “so much of living is about death,” yet “[we] too catch the frenzy to live.”

Share