{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Florida Philosophical Review","provider_url":"https:\/\/cah.ucf.edu\/fpr","author_name":"Florida Philosophical Review","author_url":"https:\/\/cah.ucf.edu\/fpr","title":"The 2000 Presidential Election: A Matter of Opinions - Florida Philosophical Review","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"G8GcHyc1FD\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cah.ucf.edu\/fpr\/article\/the-2000-presidential-election-a-matter-of-opinions\/\">The 2000 Presidential Election: A Matter of Opinions<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cah.ucf.edu\/fpr\/article\/the-2000-presidential-election-a-matter-of-opinions\/embed\/#?secret=G8GcHyc1FD\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;The 2000 Presidential Election: A Matter of Opinions&#8221; &#8212; Florida Philosophical Review\" data-secret=\"G8GcHyc1FD\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/cah.ucf.edu\/fpr\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","description":"Introduction The 2000 Presidential election with its undeniable complications has forced most legal and constitutional scholars, legal journalists and Supreme Court journalists to examine critically the status of the Supreme Court\u2019s power. For example, articles related to the Court\u2019s accountability or lack thereof, Supreme Court appointments, and possible reform and constitutional interpretation, have filled newspapers, [&hellip;]"}