<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Florida Philosophical Review</provider_name><provider_url>https://cah.ucf.edu/fpr</provider_url><author_name>Jesslyn Parrish</author_name><author_url>https://cah.ucf.edu/fpr/author/je000450/</author_url><title>Contextualism and Confusability - Florida Philosophical Review</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="EqY5dPA2es"&gt;&lt;a href="https://cah.ucf.edu/fpr/article/contextualism-and-confusability/"&gt;Contextualism and Confusability&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://cah.ucf.edu/fpr/article/contextualism-and-confusability/embed/#?secret=EqY5dPA2es" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;Contextualism and Confusability&#x201D; &#x2014; Florida Philosophical Review" data-secret="EqY5dPA2es" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script&gt;
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
//# sourceURL=https://cah.ucf.edu/fpr/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><description>Graduate Essay Prize Winning Paper of the 46th Annual Meeting of the Florida Philosophical Association Jeremy Kirby, Florida State University, Tallahassee The most promising approach toward explaining skeptical puzzles seems to be that employed by the contextualist. Contextualists enjoy both a resolution and an etiology of skeptical puzzles. However, Stephen Schiffer, in his &#x201C;Contextualist Solutions [&hellip;]</description></oembed>
